Jones Rejects Arbitration
Dan Lozano, Jacgue Jones' agent, reports Jones probably won't be playing for Minnesota in 2006.
By rejecting the Twins' offer of arbitration, the chance of Jones being a returning member of the only organization he's ever played for have shrunk from a sliver to virtually zero. All that's left is for Jones to literally sign with another team.
Last week there was a rumored offer from Kansas City that was apparently untrue, but this week there is another rumor including the Royals and Jones to the tune of 3 years, $15 million dollars. Along with Minnesota, Seattle, Arizona and the Dodgers are rumored to be the most interested suitors.
With all the multi-year offers coming in, Lozano said there was no way Jones would accept a 1-year deal. Should Jones sign with another team, and there's no doubt he will, the Twins will be compensated with a draft pick.
Terry Ryan has stated he was awaiting Jones' decision before proceeding with other free agents. It looks like Jones' decision has been made.
One more time: Au Revoir, Jacque.
13 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Making Room in LA
At the risk of sounding like a crazy internet conspiracy theorist, it just so happens that the same day Jones denies arbitration and his agent makes it clear his client will not play for KC (who would besides "Douggie Baseball"), the Dodgers traded away their center fielder for a minor leaguer, freeing up cap room and a spot in the outfield.
I think a fair amount of deductive reasoning is all that is needed to conclude that Jones is Goin' Back to Cali. I have checked ESPN and Twinsbaseball.com every hour on the hour expecting to see the news.
It's only a matter of time.
by becker on Dec 13, 2005 7:14 PM EST reply actions
That's what I was thinking, too...
LOL
He will not play long for whatever team is dumb enough to sign him. Just wait.
by statman on Dec 13, 2005 11:18 PM EST reply actions
Hyperbole
Who's going to play...
And actually, Rivas is the counterargument that makes my case! LOL
(I hate JJ so much as a player)
by statman on Dec 14, 2005 3:10 PM EST up reply actions
Fine...
Nick Swisher
Aubrey Huff
Jeromy Burnitz
Casey Blake
Alexis Rios
Sammy Sosa
That's only considering guys with 400+ PAs, and without considering defense. When you consider that Jones is a superb defender, he passes a list of players about as long as the one above.
Once again...
I suspect this argument will continue as Jones accepts arbitration. He'd be a fool to not accept, and I think Ryan was a fool (though I like the fact he took a chance--because he rarely does so) for offering arb.
His sad cry for support in the paper yesterday was sickening for me to read. Seriously, he had better go to the NL where it will take pitchers a time or two to learn how to get him out easily. Otherwise, I see him being benched and then desperately traded.
Oh, to have a Swisher.
by statman on Dec 14, 2005 6:28 PM EST up reply actions
Jones' Defense
You're going to look back at these comments and feel pretty silly when Jones signs his new contract with someone else for at least 3 years with at least $5M/year.
defense
However, my knock on Jones is twofold, and frankly, the only legitimate knock on his game. They just happen to be my pet peeves, which is why i am okay with his departure from the Twins.
- He almost NEVER hits the cutoff man.
- Horrid pitch selection/too many bad at bats.
by brandonp on Dec 15, 2005 11:48 AM EST up reply actions
The Baggie
Also, his arm rivaled Ichiro.
Also, how many ties did he break with late inning and/or extra inning home runs?
Also, who had more big hits RBIs in the 2002-2004 playoffs besides Jones?
Also, he was genuinely classy and gracious in accepting his forced role into RF when Shannon Stewart insisted on playing LF.
Also, he has been the most consistent power production man on the Twins in the last 4 seasons.
Why would you ever want Swisher over this mench for any other reason than to save money?
by TheMattWilke on Dec 15, 2005 8:25 PM EST up reply actions
Um, no he hasn't
by Gargoyle on Dec 19, 2005 3:33 PM EST reply actions
replying to your previous comment
by cortalekanak on Jan 13, 2007 12:12 AM EST reply actions

by 


















