Meet: Luis Castillo
I've been as giddy as a 6-year old on Christmas morning...
...but let's try and find some perspective, shall we?
What We Lost
In brief, we lost Travis Bowyer and Scott Tyler, two young pitchers who more than likely would have been bolstering our bullpen at some point this season. Bowyer saw brief time in Minnesota during a September callup, throwing 9 2/3 innings, striking out 12, walking 3, allowing 3 home runs, and surrending 10 hits en route to a 5.59 ERA. Fantastic strikeout rate, good velocity on the fastball...not too much else to be excited about. In the future, absolutely, he has all the potential in the world to become an imposing presence. That potential was the centerpiece of our trade for our new second baseman.
Tyler saw no time at The Show in 2005, but if he wasn't on the opening day roster in the spring, chances were he's be showing himself before the season wore into the dog days of summer.
What We Gained
First, we gained a few million dollars on the payroll. Before anyone says "Castillo's salary is just replacing Jones'", no, it isn't. Tacking Castillo's salary puts us precipitously close to a $60 million dollar payroll if it doesn't push us over. With Jones, we'd be closer to $70 million. With a payroll of $55-$58 million the past few seasons, there was no salary for Jones on the books coming into this offseason. This tells us that Castillo's acquisition is a conscious decision by management to add to the payroll.
Castillo has also won awards for his defensive eptitude, capturing consecutive Gold Gloves in 2003 and 2004. In 2006, he'll be 30 years old for virtually the entire season, which means that even for a second baseman he's still in his physical prime. With Mauer behind the plate, Castillo at second and Hunter patrolling center field, Minnesota will be one of the strongest teams up the middle in 2006.
In Luis (v 2.0), we also have a switch-hitter who can bat the top of the order. Historically he hits left handers better than right handers (something we're not used to at all), and has good speed. To switch things up, don't be too surprised if Gardenhire experiments with leading off Castillo and batting Stewart second in front of Mauer. Otherwise, if things remain status-quo, the top five hitters will be Stewart, Castillo, Mauer, Morneau, Hunter. This isn't bad. (Food for thought: Castillo, Mauer, Stewart, Morneau, Hunter?)
Things To Be Excited About
You mean, apart from the defense? Apart from the switch-hitting? Apart from a solid presence at the top of the order? Castillo's career OBP is .370. He has 245 stolen bases since 1999. He's had more doubles than errors in the same timeframe, which isn't bad for a middle infielder. To make it sound even better, he's committed only 13 errors in 2004 and 205 combined. Range? Check. Arm? Check. Accuracy? Check. Pivot? Check.
Take a look at these numbers: .384, .418, .344, .364, .381, .373, .391. These are his OBP numbers for the last seven years. Excuse me while I get a napkin to wipe the drool off the keyboard. Let's not get ahead of ourselves and say this trade puts us over the top, but it's a trade that makes us better, makes us more dangerous, and it's going to make it easier for the Twins to score runs.
Reason For Pause
As excited as I am, there are a couple of things that will be interesting to look for.
First, Castillo stole 193 bases from 1999 to 2002, averaging just over 48 per season. From 2003-2005, he's swiped only 52 for an average of 17. In 2005 he stole only 10 bases. This implies that Castillo has lost a step as he moved into his later 20's. In fact, before the trade last week, I read a report stating that many GM's around the league held concerns that Castillo had "...lost his burst." I can't say I've seen enough of him to make that judgement myself, but the numbers certainly are there to support it.
Second, he holds minimal power. As a middle infielder this isn't a typical prerequesite, but it's an issue the Twins need to deal with in the offseason. A number of boxes on our offseason checklist were marked following this trade, but the power box isn't one of them. This is still a very serious concern.
Finally, a couple of small concerns. It will be interesting to watch and see how he responds to an American League style of play, and how he responds to seeing a number of pitchers for the first time. Also, in 2005 he played his fewest number of games and innings since becoming an everyday player in 1999. Hopefully this isn't the start of a trend.
In the End...
...what we've acquired in Castillo can't be the last thing we do to improve our club. It's a better start than I could have asked for, being I expected us to pick up a Graffanino or Mueller-type player as opposed to a 3-time All Star ('02, '03, '05). One big updrage down...one more to go.
The Winter Meetings are just getting underway, and there's been lots of talking for the first day. I'm looking for the uncompromisable Mr. Ryan to pull another hitter out of his bag of tricks. Number one on my list is Kevin Mench, although I've heard the Rangers are still asking for Liriano as the main piece in any trade. That, my dear Rangers, isn't going to happen.
For a better analysis than this off-the-cuff post, check out a great one over at Aaron Gleeman. It's definately worth your time.
10 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Liriano...
Be Wary...
Castillo was a steal...
Man, what are they doing down in Florida? I mean, Loria is a major tool and all (the 5 tools of baseball: hitting for average, hitting for power, fielding ability, speed, and Jeff Loria), but they're not even getting back equal value for their players. You'd think GM Larry Beinfest would be able to do better for guys like Beckett, Delgado, Castillo, etc.
by hornbakr on Dec 6, 2005 5:19 PM EST reply actions
Stealing
Plus putting an end of the carnival of mediocrity that was 2nd base last year is worth quite a bit to me psychologically.
BTW, Steve Phillips is currently reporting that the Twins are still interested in Mueller....
Careful with the power...
Against left-handers last year, his slugging average was .649. 649!!! Granted, it was in 111 at-bats, but no Twin hit for more power against LHP last year. LeCroy hit .621, and it's silly that he's not back here, and Hunter was next at .557.
And really, it's not that much of a fluke, he hit for a .519 SLG vs. LHP from 2002-2004. For a middle infielder, I'll take power from one side of the plate.
What we gave up!
Tyler is another story. He would not be with the Twins anytime in 2006. He was a starter in 2005, however, would not be a starter next year as the Twins do not have a place for him. Eight pitchers started 9 or more games last year in Ft. Myers (yes, he spent the entire season in Hi-A). Three, Simonitsch, Perkins and Blackburn pitched better and were promoted to New Britain. Adam Harben put up the best numbers and most innings on the staff. Rainville and Swarzak joined the team at mid season, and performed better than Tyler during the last half. Justin Jones also joined the team at mid season out of extended spring training and put up the best numbers during the second half. Tyler pitched well, but was not as good as any of the others and would likely not have a starting job at either Ft. Myers or New Britain, thus, he would be moved to a reliever which may be best for him.
Someone who was the 8th best starter at Ft. Myers would not be playing for the Twins in 2006. It is reported that he is a big, strong kid with some potential, however, it is very questionable if he would ever have pitched for the Twins.
Regarding the payroll, assuming Lohse, Cuddyer, and Punto receive 4.0mm, 500k, 450k, respectively, and most of last years rookies get between 330k and 400k, the payroll is currently at $60,695,000.
by roger @ Twinkie Town on Dec 7, 2005 7:50 AM EST reply actions
Agreed...
And Bowyer throws really hard, but without a quality breaking pitch, and with a fairly high walk rate last season, I'd be the Twins were pretty down on him.
TR slept well the day he made that deal.
Tyler a Twin?
He would never have seen the big leagues this year or most likely next. And then he'd have to stick or be dumped. I'm guessing he would have been dumped.
He struggled a little at A+ ball, and he just can't seem to figure it out. I'd like to see his first two innings per start vs the rest to see if it's enough better that he'd make a decent reliever (I assume most starters are better in the first two innings, but how much better is he compared to avg).
I'm not really sure why you thoughtTyler would have a decent or better shot at a call-up this year...a little help? :-)
by statman on Dec 7, 2005 8:26 PM EST reply actions
Re: Tyler
Oops.
replying to your previous comment
by cortalekanak on Jan 14, 2007 10:12 AM EST reply actions

by 


















