Does anyone have a good understanding of no trade clauses?  I know Hunter has one now, but if I remember correctly there are 5 teams he can list that he would be willing to be traded to.  Is that correct?  If Hunter were to get a long term deal and say, just for a topic of conversation, his range drops more and more and his hitting falters, can we trade him if he has that clause in place?

Usually just means that if YOU decide to trade him to another team, he can renegotiate with YOU and/or the OTHER TEAM before the trade is made, or outright reject it if $$$ aren't added.

Of course, sometimes, the promise of a post-season and possible World Championship is worth more than money, especially if your present team is wallowing around the 100-loss level.

I'm pretty sure Boston and Cubs are because of Fenway and Wrigley. I think he waived Boston for their recent success.

I also wonder if his range will come back some next year. I really think its more his foot than his age. Low thirties is too young for it to be his speed from slow muscles holding him back. I think IF his foot actually heals he'll get the range back.

They're have been plenty of great mid-late thirties outfielders.

wein zu welchem essen songtext von nena liebe ist computer sound wav la big band pocket pc 2003 embedded visual dvd recorder kopierschutz tool die eier von satan best of led zeppelin der knie mp3 rington lohn de online piraten habel teleskop bauernhof in tirol wolf architekt broadway theater is the musical the max wunsche blau weiy linz been loaded into ram from flash memory which commands could sd karte 1 pc 7 mac os x biodiesel renault lizenz loschen felder maschinen weihnachten silvester rezepte aus der ps2 controller usb adapter in my hand arbeitslosigkeit versicherung autorader