Bradke Hangs 'Em Up
The press conference is scheduled for tomorrow, 4 pm CT. I'm not big on press conferences, but hopefully I'll be able to catch this one. (I'm not sure if it's going to be televised--anyone with this info is encouraged to share.)
Many will tell you that Brad Radke's contributions to the Twins went beyond statistics. That's true, and I won't say that about many players. But his contributions include things that we can quantify.
What I'll remember Radke for, strictly from a performance-analysis standpoint, is his pinpoint control as reflected in his ultra-low walk totals.
Radke faced 10,244 batters over the course of his career, from 1995 to 2006. Of those 10,244 batters, he issued a mere 445 walks. Only 4.3% of all batters facing Radke walked. That sounds good, but how can we put it in context?
From 1995 to 2006, there were 1,385 times that a pitcher threw 120 or more innings in a season. Those performances range from a low of 1.2% (Carlos Silva, 2005) to a high of 16.3% (Victor Zambrano, 2004.) We can represent performances in between with a histogram:

From this graph, we see right away that most pitchers fall in the 7% to 9% range of walk rates. So Radke's walk rate was about half the average walk rate for a pitcher in a given season. But even more than that, there are hardly any pitchers who've had even one season at better than a 4.3% walk rate in any given season. If this was an SAT exam, we'd say that Radke was in the 95h percentile. And this isn't just one good season we're talking about--this is Radke's career rate. To extend the SAT analogy--he didn't just score 95th percentile once. He took the test over and over again--12 times--and his average performance was in the 95th percentile.
In terms of overall run prevention, there's not anything historically unusual about Brad Radke. But in terms of throwing the ball in the strike zone and making the hitter earn his way on base? Radke was something special.
14 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
How
I must be an amazingly low number.
I don't have that off hand...
Here are guys that have a chance at beating Radke over 1000 innings in the last 12 seasons: Maddux (almost certainly better), Jon Lieber, Rick Reed, Roy Halladay (had a couple of good seasons with walks, but I think he had some bad ones, too), Curt Schilling, David Wells. (Those are the guys with multiple seasons below 4.3%. I suspect no one else qualifies either from too few innings or too many walks.) I guess it wouldn't be too hard to check that list, but it's a pretty short list already.
Just the same
by AdamOnFirst on Dec 19, 2006 12:10 AM EST up reply actions
Here's a few
IP: 1279.3
BF: 5269
BB: 261
BB%: 4.9%
Bob Tewksbury (1991-1998)
IP: 1446
BF: 6085
BB: 214
BB%: 3.5%
Jon Lieber (1997-2002, 2004-2006)
IP: 1750
BF: 7367
BB: 327
BB%: 4.4%
Brian Anderson (1994-2004)
IP: 1505
BF: 6354
BB: 331
BB%: 5.2%
Shane Reynolds (1994-2003)
IP: 1753.3
BF: 7425
BB: 405
BB%: 5.4%
David Wells (1990-2005)
IP: 3101.7
BF: 12,956
BB: 606
BB%: 4.7%
Curt Schilling (1992-2006)
IP: 2965
BF: 12,010
BB: 617
BB%: 5.1%
and of course, though he's not technically 'qualified' by innings:
Carlos Silva (2002-2006)
IP: 743
BF: 3160
BB: 135
BB%: 4.3%
It's true that Radke was among the lowest BB% pitchers in the league on a regular basis during his career. It's also true that many of the pitchers near him on that list were also among the lowest BB% pitchers in the league on a regular basis during their careers as well.
by dwintheiser on Dec 19, 2006 12:35 PM EST up reply actions
Hey
Re:
by TheMattWilke on Dec 19, 2006 1:23 PM EST up reply actions
Wow, this was great
Radke for pitching coach after Anderson retires?
(Also, glad my ranty advice got taken ;))
Re:
by TheMattWilke on Dec 19, 2006 9:39 PM EST up reply actions
Cuellar is already...
Completely missed the memo on that
by TheMattWilke on Dec 20, 2006 2:13 PM EST up reply actions

by 


















