Twins Community Prospect #10

by FrozenTed9 on Aug 12, 2006 6:03 PM EDT Comment 7 comments

I was wondering If you guys and gals think we should keep going to 20 or stop here. I planned on going to 20 at first but just wondering. Well, with that out of the way our #9 prospect was Denard Span. Our list So far.
1. Matt Garza
2. Kevin Slowey
3. Alexi Casilla
4. Anthony Swarzak
5. Glen Perkins
6. Matt Moses
7. Alex Romero
8. Chris Parmelee
9. Denard Span

Poll

who is the twins number 10 prospect.

Trent Oeltjen

7 votes

David Winfee

17 votes

Kyle Waldrop

11 votes

Oswaldo Sosa

1 votes

Brian Duensing

1 votes

Other name below

0 votes

Eduardo Morlan

23 votes

Whit Robbins

2 votes

Brandon Roberts

14 votes

Daniel Valencia

4 votes

80 votes | Poll has closed

0 recs | Comment 7 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

I think

I think 20 would be too many. Franbkly, I think the last several havn't been very accurate anyway, nto to say it isn't a cool list.

"Baseball is great because you can't take a knee or kill the clock. You have to put the ball over the plate and give the other guy his damn chance." C Stengel

by AdamOnFirst on Aug 13, 2006 12:11 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs

hmmm.

do most people on this board really think that Waldrop is a better prospect than morlan?

by joeywyen on Aug 13, 2006 9:37 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs

Durability

Morlan projects as a reliever whereas Waldrop projects as a starter for durability reasons. So even though I love Morlan's peripherals, all things considered, I'd say Waldrop is a better prospect. Stll, I have nt been voting for either and would not until 14 or 15.

Joe Mauer for MVP.

by cmathewson on Aug 14, 2006 11:42 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs

It

Might have something to due with all that many people look at the stats in the minors and see who is doing better when Waldrop actually has a much lower ceiling that Morlan but Waldrop is having better results as he sould being older and a college pitcher (if i remember right).

by FrozenTed9 on Aug 13, 2006 11:27 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs