Twinkie Town: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
New Blog: Sounder At Heart for Seattle Sounders Fans!

Potential Trading Partner: Chicago Cubs

Just what every blog needs in late July: another fan who thinks they could be a GM...

In trying to find potential trade partner for the Minnesota Twins, I started looking at the Cubs organization the other day.  What I discovered is that they have several young, cheap players that could potentially fill some of the holes in the Twins lineup.  Even better, these young, cheap players are actually sorta dispensable in the Cubs organization.

The first name is Matt Murton.  I'm certainly not the first to suggest that Murton would be an excellent target for TR, but I have spent all summer (since the Cubs sent him down to AAA) telling anyone who'd listen that he'd be a perfect fit for the Twins.  He's an athletic corner outfielder (one could even envision a player like him filling in at center, if need be), who has demonstrated good patience with solid power both in the minors and majors.  Even better, the Cubs have publicly declared him trade bait, as he has been unable to squeeze into the Soriano/Pie/Floyd/Jones/Pagan outfield.  Here's the lowdown on Murton: http://www.firstinning.com/players/Matt-Murton-a

The second target would be Mike Fontenot, who has played well in limited duty at second base this season.  At 27, Fontenot is a little old to call a prospect, and he has lost a lot of playing time that past couple years to Ryan Theriot, who is a weaker hitter, but faster and can play shortstop.   On the Cubs current roster, he is squeezed around Theriot and Mark DeRosa in the middle infield. For the Twins, he would represent a better bat than Castillo, as well as being far cheaper and younger.  His addition would also allow us to delay handing the starting job to Alexi Casilla in 2008. Fontenot's stats are here: http://firstinning.com/players/Mike-Fontenot-a/

The final target is someone who was just called up the Cubs last week:  Scott Moore.  Moore actually is a legitimate prospect, a third baseman who is hammering AAA pitching at just 23.  For the Cubs, he is trapped behind Aramis Ramirez, and can only hope to be used as a back up to Aramis and Derrek Lee in the near future.  He's certainly a valuable commodity, but one would think given the Cubs roster, he's mostly valuable as trade bait.  The upside for the Twins is obvious.  He could be eased in as our starting third baseman, representing a huge step up from Punto and Brian Buscher.  And, like Murton and Fontenot, he's cheap, and could wear a Twins uniform for a number of seasons.  Here's his stats: http://firstinning.com/players/Scott-Moore-b/.

So, now that I've babbled on for far too long about three fairly random Cubs, here is the question I wanted to put out to fans in Twinkie Town.  Could you envision a trade involving Joe Nathan for two or all three of these players?  Trading Nathan would obviously be a dramatic blow to the bullpen, but we do have another relief ace in the pen.  It would also give us a good corner outfield bat, an offensive upgrade at second once Castillo is gone, and a major boost at third base.  It would also give us three major league ready position players - none of whom are terribly important to the Cubs long-term plan - who could all be starters for the Twins in 2008, 2009, and maybe even beyond.  I think a move like this would be a major step forward for rebuilding our positional strength and providing depth to our lineup.  It would also be a big step towards creating salary space for the upcoming contract talks with Torii, Johan, etc. I would love to hear what you think.

0 recs  |  Comment 40 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Not Bad
When we were talking about this earlier today, I said you should throw Castillo into this mix.  I'm not sure how he would fit however, with DeRosa and Theriot having decent seasons.  I don't see Castillo as a backup.

As far as Nathan goes, the Cubs are trying to compete this year and they could always use a solid closer.  Bob Howry and Ryan Dempster aren't what you would call "good options".  I think Chicago would be interested, from their perspective.  What doesn't make as much sense is what the Twins bullpen turns into this year.  Neshek probably closes, then you're left with Guerrier and Reyes behind him, along with a struggling Juan Rincon.  Not the strongest 'pen, especially if the Twins are still trying to contend this summer...which is another question altogether.

Murton, Fontenot and Moore...Murton and Moore I'm big fans of.  Fontenot would be okay until Casilla is ready, and at the least could keep Casilla from starting 135 games at second base next year.

Good research in finding these guys, I'm just not sure A: that the Cubs would be willing to give up all three of these guys for one closer, even if it's one of the best closers in the game and B: that the Twins would be willing to take a chance on their bullpen at this point in the season.  If we were to drop another three or four games in the standings in the next six days, the chances might be a bit better.

All the same, interesting proposition.

by Jesse on Jul 24, 2007 1:43 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Not bad, But....
i'm not sure the twins would do this. Yes it would help for the future but not for this year or next. 2008 is the year when the twins will have the best shot at winning a world series but i don't see them doing that without Nathan. I just think that you could get so much more than that. What about asking the Dodgers about one or two of their top hitting prospects....they have been rumored to be interested in Dotel and Nathan is better and less of a risk and he's signed through next year

by spenny on Jul 24, 2007 10:17 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Disagree
I think the Twins chances in 2008 revolve around finding more depth for our lineup and bench.  If our starting lineup next season includes Span, Casilla, Buscher/Punto/Cirillo, and no significant upgrade at LF or DH, we're in a heap of trouble.

I tried to weigh the idea of turning Nathan into one impact hitter versus two or three positional upgrades, and I think making a move to establish depth is more important.  If we assume TR isn't going to dive too heavily into the FA market, there could be some pretty dramatic holes next season if Hunter and Castillo go elsewhere.

As far as whether the Twins would do this, I agree that there is just about no chance TR would make this move.  I just like to dream a little...

by Bobomojo on Jul 24, 2007 10:38 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Rincon for Moore?
Not sure the Cubs would go for it, but I've liked Moore for a while and he is stuck behind Ramirez.
"You're thinking too much. Just have fun." -- Bennie "The Jet" Rodriguez in Sandlot

by cmathewson on Jul 24, 2007 10:23 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

This would be a no brainer...
...as would Rincon for Murton.  I just don't see it happening, at least while Rincon's struggles continue.  Anyone else think that Rincon is intentionally under-performing to avoid being traded?

by Bobomojo on Jul 24, 2007 10:42 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Wow, that's backwards...
...I like my job and want to keep it...so I'll perform below expectations...

by Jesse on Jul 24, 2007 11:44 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Rincon
It is a purely mechanical thing with him. If he stays back and trusts his stuff, he locates and is effective. If he rushes and tries to spot the ball, he loses the bite on his pitches and he leaves them in the middle of the plate. The last couple of outings were good. They happened to be in front of a lot of scouts. Hopefully that will be enough.
"You're thinking too much. Just have fun." -- Bennie "The Jet" Rodriguez in Sandlot

by cmathewson on Jul 24, 2007 11:47 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Agreed completely.
Amazing, good analysis without the seemingly requisite "stat-head" backup. Nicely done!

He's absolutely rushing his mechanics. He hasn't looked comfortable all season until after the ASB. Maybe he spent the break looking over film and breaking down his outings, because he is doing what a late reliever should be doing; throw, don't pitch. Challenge the hitter and mix it up.

by nathaneide on Jul 24, 2007 12:58 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

my bad
hay guys stop using stats to back arguments lol

wut do i look like a rocket surgeon?

by ravenfly on Jul 24, 2007 4:59 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Nerds ruin baseball
Right, because the stat-heads would be able to tell if a guys mechanics are off or if he's attempting to spot his pitches instead of just rearing back and firing, or if a batter is dipping a shoulder or turning his hands over or pulling his head or not following through with his hips based solely upon the numbers.

No matter what happens, what the numbers say, it's still a game played by men. As such, the kinesiology of the athlete will always be the most important point in analyzing a player.

by nathaneide on Jul 25, 2007 1:18 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yep
And therefore stats are worthless. I know you're just trolling, but come on.

Nobody's trying to argue that observational analysis should be discounted in favor of stats. Because...dun dun dun...that would be retarded. Cmath's post up there is a great example of something that you can't pick up by looking at the numbers; I think we all agree on that front.

Especially in the minors and spring training. Though the numbers can certainly help point out things like "Kubel doesn't fare any worse against lefties despite Gardy's bull-headedness."

But your oft-repeated line about nerds ruining baseball? Okay. As long as we're being insulting, how about "obstinate luddites who refuse to use all the tools at their disposal to analyze the game ruin baseball"? If statistical analysis so abhorrent to you, head over to DTFC or the official Twins board. You can find plenty of unfounded "analysis" there.

by ravenfly on Jul 25, 2007 2:44 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

done
Already gone. I'm sick of the mother's basement crowd.

by nathaneide on Jul 25, 2007 2:51 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Oh, come on
Yeah, everyone who takes statistical analysis into account lives in his mother's basement.  Also, every scout is a chain-smoking former utility infielder.

Billy Beane, one of the first GMs to seriously apply statistical analysis into his decision-making, was a former player.  They're not mutually exclusive.

I am actually posting this from a basement, but it's my wife's basement, not my mother's.

by BeefMaster on Jul 25, 2007 2:55 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'm posting
from my gay boyfriend's basement. Ooops, did I just write that out loud?

by montanatwinsfan on Jul 25, 2007 10:00 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Numbers and scouting
We welcome all kinds of stuff here, and hopefully the symposium helps get both sides of the story. My perspective is you need both. Numbers help us understand what is happening. Scouting helps us understand why it's happening. The numbers can give us trends, but they rarely tell us whether those trends will continue or change with a slight mechanical adjustment.

For example, Jason Bartlett is in the top five in the AL in line drive percentage despite having marginal numbers even at his position. Why? Because he's really good at squaring up on the ball, but he makes a lot of outs on lazy liners to right field. If those liners were lower to the ground, he'd be hitting well over .300 right now. He just needs to get a little more on top of those balls to be the .300 hitter everyone expects him to be. That means a slightly more level swing than he has right now to put some top spin on those liners.

"You're thinking too much. Just have fun." -- Bennie "The Jet" Rodriguez in Sandlot

by cmathewson on Jul 25, 2007 3:00 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

With you completely
I completely agree that Rincon will be fine.  I do think that his inflated ERA may scare off the Cubs from trading a good, cheap bat.  I'd love to be wrong - using him to get Moore or Murton would be a valuable use of both teams strengths.

by Bobomojo on Jul 24, 2007 1:26 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Rincon
Remember this is the team that just traded for Jason Kendall because he's a "leadership" guy. Hendry really needs a stretch run this year and I think he'd be happy to add a "competitor" with "playoff experience" to "the mix". Steroids are obv. a story for the Cubs, but Rincon served his suspension quietly and didn't upset his teammates, which makes him a "character" and "clubhouse" guy. Seriously, sometimes I think the Cubs pay more attention to adjectives than statistics. So a "change of scenery" could work, esp. if it doesn't cost them Pie or anyone from the active roster.

by dwight zinfandel on Jul 24, 2007 12:03 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Fontenot
Mike Fontenot is the Cubs version of a 2004 Lew Ford.  Have fun while it lasts, Chicago.  

by TheMattWilke on Jul 24, 2007 11:12 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Mike.....
At one point, a few years back, Fontenot was bandied about as the second-base prospect the Twins were trying to trade for when he was with the Orioles.

Maybe it was a long time ago.

There was talk about a 2nd-base guy with a little punch.

check out Twinkies autograph collection at www.TwinsCards.com

by twintown on Jul 24, 2007 11:38 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Not a cure
I'm not saying that Fontenot is a cure-all, or do I believe that his season thus far is indicative of his future performance.  A brief glance at his minor league numbers makes him look like a 270/340/400 guy to me(these numbers have no mathematical basis - I'm just speculating based on past performance).  His acquisition, however, would prevent us from handing the starting job to Casilla, without having to sign an aged, overpriced, one-year rental.

by Bobomojo on Jul 24, 2007 1:33 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I like the idea
I'm getting shades of Garza being thrown to the MLB wolves and underperforming because we had no better options. Fontenot would be cheap and competent in the event that Casilla isn't ready.

Of course, I have no idea what Casilla's development curve looks like these days. You have to assume that he's the long-term answer at 2B at some point, and that the front office has a plan for him.

Yet, even if Casilla is the 2B of 2008 and performs well, Fontenot would make a decent backup MI, no? That's got some value to it, especially since that slot is the laughable L-Rod right now.

by ravenfly on Jul 24, 2007 5:02 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I don't think we need Fontenot either...
To me, if we could get a real 3b, we HAVE a stopgap/platoon partner for Casilla at 2b; his name is Nick Punto.  Granted, Punto's not exactly a great option as a 2b, but he's sure a heck of a lot better as a 2b than a 3b.  

I'd prefer to not trade Nathan at this point, but if we had to, I'd probably do it for a Murton/Moore/prospect package.  I'd just prefer to come up with something like a Rincon/Blackburn/Silva package, and bring Slowey up.  

I'm actually in favor of trading Castillo now whether we're contending or not IF we can get a real 3b.  I think Bartlett can handle leadoff duties, and I'd like to get Casilla some time up here ready for next year, probably almost platooning with Punto at 2b unless he emerges now.  I just would like to get value for Castillo while we can.

No matter though, with this trade no doubt we'd have a LOT of money free next year with pretty much all holes filled.  That'd be a good start.  CF you would have the money to re-sign Hunter (I think you do anyway, but you DEFINITELY would with this) or get a very good replacement, plus a couple bench bats.

2007:
Bartlett-SS
Mauer-C
Cuddyer-RF
Morneau-1b
Hunter-CF
Kubel-LF/DH
Murton/White-DH/LF
Moore-3b
Punto/Casilla-2b
Bench: Punto, Redmond, White, Cirillo, Ford/Tyner

Santana, Garza, Boof, Baker, Slowey
Pen: Nathan, Neshek, Guerrier, Reyes, Ortiz, Cali

2008:
Bartlett-SS
Murton-DH/LF
Mauer-C
Cuddyer-RF
Morneau-1b
Hunter-CF
Kubel-LF/DH
Moore-3b
Casilla-2b
Bench: Redmond, Punto, Buscher, MacDonald, Ford/Tyner

Santana, Garza, Liriano, 2 of Baker/Boof/Perkins/Slowey
Pen: Nathan, Neshek, Guerrier, Reyes, 2 of Baker/Boof/Perkins/Slowey

by djskilbr on Jul 24, 2007 2:24 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Disagree about your disagree
Next year is our best chance to win a world series because a.)rotation-Santana, liriano, garza,bonser,slowey/perkins/baker.(b.)bullpen-its been one of the tops in the majors the last few years and trading away nathan would hurt those chances and put added pressure on guys who haven't had to deal with pressure. And (c.) M&M boys. they will be entering the prime of their career and combine that with the very consistent Cuddy and you have yourself a solid core of RBI and run producing guys. They just need to be surrounded by average or above average players and not Punto/Rodriguez/Tyner/Ford/White/Cirillo

If anyone is to be traded it should be out of the rotation where the most depth is had in not only the major league level but also the minor league level.AAA has a solid staff and New Britian is not far behind since Swarzak has returned from his suspension

by spenny on Jul 24, 2007 2:34 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I think we actually agree
I believe the Twins have a very good opportunity in 2008, and I agree that we will waste that opportunity if our lineup features another terrible set of supporting actors.  However, I don't think we will be able to clog the holes in our line-up sufficiently through free agency, making trading away talent absolutely essential.

I love Nathan.  I would hate to see him leave Minnesota, especially when he would be so cheap next season.  However, his skill and price tag make him extremely valuable, and the presence of other quality pitching in our bullpen makes losing him bearable.  I'm not saying losing Nathan is ideal - it will certainly make our bullpen weaker.  However going into next year, the prospect of a Nathan-less bullpen is better (in my opinion) than a lineup featuring Casilla/Punto, Tyner/Ford/White, Cirillo/Punto, Span, etc...

Is there a way to acquire 2-3 cheap, major league ready bats without trading away Nathan? Maybe.  Hunter could get us one or two.  Some of our quality starting pitching prospects could yield a return.  Are these better options? Maybe.  But lets remember that there is perhaps nothing more valuable right now (in light of the crazy free agent market) than cheap, major league ready bats.  They're not going to come cheap.

by Bobomojo on Jul 25, 2007 10:02 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Something
Murton and Moore are the EXACT kind of player we should probably look to add, so I'd look to get it done.  Silva in there?  Rincon?  How close could we get with those two?

I do not really want to trade Nathan this year at all.

Baseball is great because you cant take a knee or kill the clock. You gotta put the ball over the plate and give the other guy his damn shot E Weaver abridged

by AdamOnFirst on Jul 25, 2007 12:17 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Twins Trades
Sorry to breath a little reality into this, but...

Speculating on trades, i.e., playing 'Fantasy GM,' is generally a waste of time, and even more so with regard to the Twins, as Terry Ryan is a wimp who's afraid of his own shadow when it comes to making bold moves (and often, just making the right move), just as Gardy is a wuss coddles his players endlessly and will not say a discouraging word in public. Compare these to, say, the Tigers' GM and Manager, and you see why the Twins will never get beyond the first round of the playoffs under the current regime. Such a shame for a team with 2.5 (Mauer isn't quite in the Morneau/santana category) of the top 25 or so players in the league.

by hoskins powell on Jul 25, 2007 1:19 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Counter-reality
First of all, "playing 'Fantasy GM' is about as entertaining a discussion as you can have about a baseball team, and I'd argue that alone makes it not a waste of time.

Beyond that, though, it's not necessarily the case that Ryan is averse to bold moves - I think the Matt Lawton trade in '01 was pretty darned bold (trading one of the team's best and most well-known players), as were the Eric Milton, AJ Pierzynski, and Shannon Stewart trades, all of which either traded or brought in a reasonably prominent player.

Moreover, the "they'll never win a playoff series!" talk is rather silly, as they already have won a playoff series.  Granted, it was five years ago now, but it was the same GM and manager that you're bemoaning the effectiveness of, so it's obviously not the case that they can't do it.

Since when is Gardy known for coddling his players, by the way?  I'd agree that he plays favorites to some extent (Punto, Tyner, etc., while refusing to commit to Kubel and Cuddyer), but one of the main stories last year was how Morneau took off after a scathing talk with Gardy.  I guess he usually isn't too vicious with players in the press, but I don't see how doing so would be a virtue.  Bobby Cox and Joe Torre don't do that, either... are they wusses?

by BeefMaster on Jul 25, 2007 2:57 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Cubs fan here
  1. Murton can not play center. He can't play right, and struggles in left. He has a great eye at the plate, and a nice level swing. He's more of a doubles hitter than a home run threat at this point, so far now he is an up the middle bat who can only play in the corners. He was sent down earlier this year to AAA and has been playing pretty well. He could make some serious improvements if given a chance to play regularly. He's a good trade candidate in that he can only play left, and we have a billion dollars tied up in left until 2015. But the Cubs have never publically made him available, that is false.
  2. Scott Moore also has no future with the Cubs, given who blocks him. He'd be a good target.
  3. Mike Fontenot is a great sell-high candidate for the Cubs, but Hendry doesn't trade high. He's trying to dump Izturis, Jones and Eyre at rock-bottom value, rather than recognizing that Fontenot is playing way over his head given his age and minor league stats and getting something useful for him. He's a high energy guy but he's definitely not this good.
There since I passed on that info can we have Mauer for Prior?

by jazzypete on Jul 25, 2007 3:00 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Thanks jazzypete...
what would you realistically want/expect from the Twins for either or both of those guys?  Obviously meaning us not trading longterm keys of the team like Mauer/Morneau/Kubel, prospects, etc.

Would be curious to know from a Cubs fan.

by djskilbr on Jul 25, 2007 3:10 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

longterm key?
I like Kubel as much as the next guy, but calling him an untradable long-term key to the team seems a little overzealous to me.

by ravenfly on Jul 25, 2007 3:29 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I don't think so...
Other than Mauer/Morneau/Cuddyer (I'm leaving out Hunter due to salary/likelihood of signing him, etc.) who would you rather have than Kubel offensively for the next 2-3 years on this team?  I can't think of anyone that's even real close, and I like both Bartlett and Casilla.  Kubel's talent just far outweighs them as a hitter if you ask me, and he's relatively cheap the next 2-3 years in all likelihood, even with arbitration.

by djskilbr on Jul 26, 2007 1:03 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Not hatin'
Oh, I'm in favor of Kubel; he certainly has the talent. I'm just saying that it's far from certain that he'll ever put it together at the major league level, and gracing him with the "long term key to the franchise" along with Morneau/Mauer et al is overdoing things.

If some GM wanted him as part of a trade package that was otherwise favorable, I wouldn't put him in the "out of the question" category is all.

by ravenfly on Jul 26, 2007 4:13 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

If you trade him though...
you're just opening up another hole.  There aren't many players at Kubel's position, given talent and salary, that I'd want over him.

by djskilbr on Jul 26, 2007 5:14 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Exactly
If we could get three right handed hitters somewhere in between Kubel's and Cuddyer's skills to fill third, center and DH, I'd say we have a contending team. If we just got two to fill third and DH and somehow hold onto Hunter, we have a championship team in 2008.

LaRoche and Wigginton would do. If we traded Hunter, Milledge, LaRoche and Wigginton would do.

"You're thinking too much. Just have fun." -- Bennie "The Jet" Rodriguez in Sandlot

by cmathewson on Jul 26, 2007 5:46 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Agreed...
Bottomline, we should be able to come up with a cheap but good DH and 3b (or LF/DH with Kubel) between Castillo, Rincon, and our extra pitching prospects.  I agree that with Hunter that makes us a championship team in 2008 with our staff.

Seems like simple math to me.

by djskilbr on Jul 26, 2007 5:52 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Not so sure...
I keep looking at Castillo and Rincon, and I can't see how we're going to turn those two players into 2 cheap, major league ready hitters.  I just can't see it, unless we're throwing in some of our top pitching help, which makes me very nervous.  Having a few extra spare pitchers with a small price tag is a heck of a luxury, especially since so much of our planned rotation for next year is unproven (I'm throwing a repaired Liriano into the 'unproven' category).

Maybe I'm wrong.  I'd love to be wrong.  Keeping Hunter and adding two bats without giving up much would make us an awfully good team next year.  Let's just not talk about year five or six of Hunter's contract.

by Bobomojo on Jul 26, 2007 6:59 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Not just Rincon and Castillo
If you throw in Silva and a pitching prospect or two, you can get it done.
"You're thinking too much. Just have fun." -- Bennie "The Jet" Rodriguez in Sandlot

by cmathewson on Jul 26, 2007 7:32 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yep...
agreed.  I meant to throw in Silva.

And we can afford to trade 1-2 pitching prospects from Baker/Slowey/Perkins/Duensing/Blackburn/Mullens.  That won't leave us in the lurch one bit.

by djskilbr on Jul 26, 2007 7:35 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Thanks for the info...
...I love the internet.  On the same discussion thread we are simultaneously debating the merits of scout-based versus stat-based scouting as well as joining together Twins fans and Cubs fans in fantasy GM discussions.  It's a good time to be a baseball nerd...

I love hearing your insights - you certainly know far better that I how these players are viewed in the Cubs organization.  I especially like the comments on Murton - I saw him play a couple times on WGN earlier this year, and thought he looked athletic enough to be a fill-in CF.  Guess I was way off base.

As far as the Cubs saying Murton was available, I was referring to this, posted back in May on Baseball Prospectus: "The Chicago Cubs desperately need bullpen help, and reportedly would part with outfielder Matt Murton in the right deal"
(source: http://www.baseballprospectus.com/article.php?articleid=6251)
If this report was way off base, my apologies for quoting it.

I, too, would be fascinated on what you think the Twins would need to offer to get these players.  I'm also wondering if you know anything about Scott Moore's defensive abilities. Again, your insight is greatly appreciated.

by Bobomojo on Jul 25, 2007 3:28 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Replying to my own post...I just can't shut up
OK...I'm just writing this down for my own benefit...please don't tell me how unlikely this scenario is.  I know this.  As I said earlier in this post, I'm just dreaming a little...

Two Trades:

Nathan (+ some other pieces... minor league help, some other piece that's not in the picture for 2008) to the Cubs for Murton, Fontenot, and Moore.  This trade is highly unlikely...TR won't trade Nathan, and I don't think that the Cubs would part with three ML-ready position players.  But, being a nerd, I'm gonna live in fantasy land for a minute.

Hunter to the Yankees for Melky Cabrera and one or two of their great pitching prospects (Joba Chamberlain and Ian Kennedy would be ideal).

Castillo to...someone.  For bullpen depth.

2008 Minnesota Twins (before free agency)

C: Mauer (L)/Redmond (R)
1B: Morneau (L)
2B: Fontenot (L)/Casilla (S)
SS: Bartlett (R)
3B: Moore (L)/Buscher (L)
LF: Murton (R)/Kubel (L)
CF: Cabrera (S)/Span (L)
RF: Cuddyer (R)
Others, depending on contract status: Punto, Tyner, Ford, MacDonald, Jones

Rotation: 5 of the following: Santana, Garza, Liriano, Baker, Boof, Perkins, Slowey, NYY Prospect
Bullpen: A little hard to say...obviously Neshek, Guerrier, and Reyes.  I'm not too sure on the contract status of others.  The Castillo trade could help solidify this.

As I point out, this is the team we have before entering free agency.  The obvious holes are right handed bats and bullpen uncertainty.  The good thing is that we have opened up a ton of payroll (a very good thing considering the amount of money that will soon be owed the best pitcher in baseball) and that our holes are certainly addressable.  By securing a talented player for each position, we've left ourselves some flexibility in finding a right handed bat.  We could really take our pick of hitters (in our price range) and know that we can fit them into the line-up.  In addition, we've further solidified our collection of quality starting pitching prospects.

OK, that's it.  Another dude just wasting his time making up trades that'll never happen.

by Bobomojo on Jul 26, 2007 2:31 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

TT is an SB Nation blog of, by and for the fans. We strive to be the best Minnesota Twins blog by providing quality content and analysis, as well as daily news and notes on the team. We hope you'll make Twinkie Town your home for all things Twins!
Start posting about the Twins »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
Implications of Picking up Cuddyers Option and Trading for Hardy
Small
Organization Review (Center fielders)
Small
Minor League Report...November 7, 2009
Joemauerjesus_small
"I am going to create a lot of RBIs for Morneau, the catcher and the other guy."
Small
Kent Hrbek as a Rookie
Joel87bw5_small
And NOW THE OFFSEASON BEGINS!
Fitch372aurora_073_small
2010 Free Agents
Small
Organization Review (Corner Outfielders)
Small
Minor League Report...October 31, 2009
Small
Gomez vs. Young

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Twinkie Town On Twitter

SPONSORS


Editor-In-Chief

Twinkietown_small Jesse

Senior Writer

Hrbek_small Jon Marthaler

The_jet_small cmathewson

Gladdentwins_small Adam Peterson

Hosken_powell_autograph_small RandBall's Stu