Random Acquisition Proposal: Julio Franco
The last active position player from RBI Baseball was recently designated for assignment... could he be a worthwhile acquisition for the Twins?

I'm proposing the Twins acquire Julio Franco, who the Braves designated for assignment when they acquired Mark Texiera. In my scenario, Franco would either be claimed off waivers or traded for an conditional prospect (like the Bret Boone deal), and the Twins would send down Luis Rodriguez to make room on the 25-man roster. Yes, I know Franco's almost 49 years old. Yes, I know he's only hitting .221/.324/.291 this year. But I'm serious about this. Here's an (admittedly off-the-cuff) analysis of pluses and minuses.
Pluses:
- Have you seen the Twins' bench? With the standard Twins starting lineup, the only decent bench bat is the backup catcher, and although Gardy's been better about having both Redmond and Mauer in the lineup, it still wouldn't hurt to have another option available.
- That horrific stat line could be an issue of small sample size. Julio's poor results this year have been in extremely limited at bats (just over 100 PA). As recently as two years ago, he put up an OPS near .800, and even the .700 he managed last year is a step up from Tyner at DH.
- Really, will we miss L-Rod? Punto's move to the utility role has made Rodriguez pretty much redundant, as the Twins can back up any infield position with Punto or Cirillo.
- I'd assume the Twins could basically get him for free, since the Braves will be letting him go anyway. I'm not sure of the 40-man roster situation, although I'd assume there's an opening thanks to the Castillo trade.
- Karma - it seems like having the oldest player in the league on your team should be a positive force for your team somehow.
- Did I mention that he's almost 49? That is older than both players who were inducted into the Hall of Fame this week. He's not getting any younger, and it's very possible that his struggles this year aren't a product of small sample size - they're a product of being old.
- He's already been released by two teams this year... obviously they haven't found his performance acceptable.
- The desire has been for a power bat... and Julio ain't it. His career high in homeruns is 20, and he hasn't had half that in over a decade (although he did hit 9 in 2005).
- It's not a guaranteed upgrade by any means. Julio would likely be taking at bats away from Ford and Tyner (DH and PH), and he's not outperforming either of them so far this year.
TwinkieTown, tell me why this is a bad idea.
0 recs |
14
comments
Comments
Eh
by AdamOnFirst on Aug 2, 2007 4:32 PM EDT 0 recs
I say sure
Oh, ok, I have one reason why it's not a good idea: He's played so long and for so many teams he might forget he plays for the Twins...he could think he's playing for the opposition.
by Jesse on Aug 2, 2007 4:44 PM EDT 0 recs
No
by rayken on Aug 2, 2007 5:15 PM EDT 0 recs
I'm ok with it
by Waldo on Aug 2, 2007 5:16 PM EDT 0 recs
I'm guessing that...
I've never been able to read Gardy very well, but I'm kind of suspicious that he'll do something like this:
Casilla/Bartlett/Punto split time at 2B/SS, with Bartlett and Casilla getting most of the playing time.
Buscher/Cirillo/Punto split time at 3B, with Buscher and Cirillo in a straight L/R platoon (at least as long as Cirillo's knees will let him play), and with Punto coming in on defense in close games. Buscher gets the call ahead of Rodriguez because we know that Rodriguez has been bad and we know less well that Buscher will eventually suck.
Kubel/Rondell split time at DH in a L/R platoon. This is a guess, but I think that Gardy has seen too much of injured Rondell over the last year plus to think that Rondell is healthy enough to play everyday. Since he can't play everyday, he'll play against lefties.
Tyner/Ford split time in LF in a L/R platoon. Gardy also likes his OF defense, and thinks that Tyner/Ford are much better out there than Kubel, so with Tyner being "hot" and all, this is his way of keeping Tyner in the lineup.
The reason I don't think it will go down quite like this is that Gardy doesn't seem to like platoons all that much, but this would get everyone some playing time (something that Gardy likes) and it would be a somewhat reasonable way of dealing with the scrubs on hand.
by ubelmann on
Aug 2, 2007 5:55 PM EDT
up
0 recs
I would...
by djskilbr on
Aug 2, 2007 7:21 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Platoons
To support this, you would need to:
- Identify the positions where a logical platoon would occur during Gardy's tenure. Name the position and the two players who would have been preferable to one.
- Show the instances in which he failed to do this.
by Firpo Marberry on
Aug 2, 2007 11:49 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Jones
by Diggity Dino on
Aug 3, 2007 9:03 AM EDT
up
0 recs
Yup
I wouldn't say he doesn't like platooning people. He platoons Jason Kubel plenty. He just doesn't do it based on platoon splits. He more does it on how much he likes you. If you aren't one of his guys yet, you get platooned.
by AdamOnFirst on
Aug 3, 2007 12:45 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Try again
Again:
>>>>The reason I don't think it will go down quite like this is that Gardy doesn't seem to like platoons all that much.
One example. Even two. Even three, do not support this contention.
Gardenhire has been manager long enough that in today's game there must be a half-dozen examples of this, if in fact it's true.
I suspect it is not true, or at least there are not enough examples to support this.
by Firpo Marberry on
Aug 4, 2007 3:14 AM EDT
up
0 recs
Roster move
Franco is not as clear-cut an upgrade from those two as he is from Rodriguez (although I would probably have him pinch hit for either).
by BeefMaster on
Aug 3, 2007 11:45 AM EDT
up
0 recs
It is interesting though...
by djskilbr on Aug 2, 2007 7:22 PM EDT 0 recs
LaVelle
by Waldo on
Aug 3, 2007 5:44 PM EDT
up
0 recs












