Cirillo traded?
LEN3 says so, but is being cryptic.
"At about 4:15 p.m., Twins manager Ron Gardenhire pulled Jeff Cirillo off the field to inform him that he had been traded to Arizona. We'll have the details as soon as they become available."
I...didn't see this coming. I really hope this isn't the move to make room for Cuddyer rather than ridding ourselves of the redundant L-Rod.
Thoughts?
0 recs |
29 comments
Comments
La Velle seemed to say...
I liked Cirillo but his health just wasn't allowing him to help us. Good move if you ask me. TR just saved another $500K. I'm hoping we got something decent for him. Chris Carter?
by djskilbr on Aug 3, 2007 6:34 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Press release...
No trade - just clearing a roster spot for Cuddyer.
by dwintheiser on Aug 3, 2007 6:52 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
La Velle
"I can't get into this right now, but there's more to this one, folks."
It's enough to make you wonder whether there's more to it, but I have no idea what it could be.
by Waldo on Aug 3, 2007 6:55 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Never Mind
by Waldo on Aug 3, 2007 7:03 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Rodriguez v Cirillo
by TT on Aug 3, 2007 7:19 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I think...
by djskilbr on Aug 3, 2007 7:29 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Cirillo was hitting...
As far as I can tell, Luis Rodriguez still has options left. If the Twins really think that Rodriguez fits into their long-term plans, they could have kept him around by optioning him to Rochester and then he'd be back up again when rosters expand in September.
I don't think the Twins had a great chance to make the playoffs, but this hurts their chances of making the playoffs, and for what? $500K? Unless TR has something up his sleeve to replace Cirillo, I'm not a fan of this move.
by ubelmann on Aug 3, 2007 7:49 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I have that thought too ubelmann...
- I do think there is more to this (another bat to replace on the roster that is). Guess we'll see.
- Gardy wasn't giving him the ab's he deserved anyway.
- Maybe he's more hurt than we know. Heck, he hasn't been able to play the field at ALL in how long now?
by djskilbr on Aug 3, 2007 8:16 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Check your facts...
He played 3B on the 31st and on the 29th. 23 of his appearances were in the field.
I do think there is more to this (another bat to replace on the roster that is). Guess we'll see.
Don't hold your breath.
by ubelmann on Aug 4, 2007 2:54 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
ugh
I wasn't mad about the Castillo trade. But I'm mad about this! And to save a measly $500K???
And now I assume we'll learn he wasn't a good clubhouse presence. Right. Well even if it's true, I don't care. They're supposed to be trying to win games, not brownie points for butt kissing.
Hunter, Nathan, and Santana were the ones who mouthed off. So they fire the old, injured guy? That's showin' 'em.
Can we take the stadium back? Oh that's right, we were never allowed to vote for it in the first place.
by by jiminy on Aug 3, 2007 11:53 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah...
Yeah, the Castillo trade makes some sense. The Twins saved a legitimate amount of money with that trade, and Casilla is a reasonable Castillo facsimile right now. I don't think Casilla is an upgrade necessarily, but it makes sense to get the kid some time.
Getting rid of Cirillo only clears up space for inferior players who shouldn't have a significant role in the Twins' future.
And if we're getting rid of players who have injury problems, what about Rondell White??? How on earth is he still on the roster if "answering the bell" is such an important quality in a player?
by ubelmann on Aug 4, 2007 2:58 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Comparisons
Just as with the Hall of Fame -- where you just can't say, "If X is in, Y should be in" you can't invoke White when discussing Cirillo.
Cirillo was of little use to this team, and being jumping to conclusions is common on this board it's my jump that there were many times Gardenhire wanted Cirillo in the lineup this year and Cirillo could not answer the bell, yet he was occupying a spot on the roster.
To be fair, at least White was on the DL. As both a manager and a GM, you prefer an injured guy on the DL to one who is on the bench saying he can't go.
On top of that, it's not like the Twins were playing .580 ball with Cirillo and .400 without him.
by Firpo Marberry on Aug 4, 2007 4:09 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Comparisons
Just as with the Hall of Fame -- where you just can't say, "If X is in, Y should be in" you can't invoke White when discussing Cirillo.
Cirillo was of little use to this team, and being jumping to conclusions is common on this board it's my jump that there were many times Gardenhire wanted Cirillo in the lineup this year and Cirillo could not answer the bell, yet he was occupying a spot on the roster.
To be fair, at least White was on the DL. As both a manager and a GM, you prefer an injured guy on the DL to one who is on the bench saying he can't go.
On top of that, it's not like the Twins were playing .580 ball with Cirillo and .400 without him.
by Firpo Marberry on Aug 4, 2007 4:09 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
When Cirillo left...
Cirillo appeared in 50 of the Twins' first 107 or so games. He was available enough to be worth $500K to this team.
you can't invoke White when discussing Cirillo
Watch me.
White gave the team no value when he was on the DL, and has been below replacement level so far since he's been off the DL. Cirillo has been more valuable than Rondell this year, and would probably have had even more value to this team if he'd only been used against left-handed pitching.
Meanwhile, Rondell is getting paid a lot more than Cirillo. If I had to dump one of those guys, I'd dump Rondell in a heartbeat.
On top of that, it's not like the Twins were playing .580 ball with Cirillo and .400 without him.
Cirillo filled a role on this team--hitting lefties--that is now unfilled. Losing him makes the team worse. The $500K isn't going to help us win any games this year, but Cirillo could have.
by ubelmann on Aug 4, 2007 6:03 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm getting over it
We're always complaining they don't go with young guys and see what they've got. I guess that's what they're doing -- work out the kinks now so they'll be ready next year.
That makes more sense at second than third though. More at bats for Punto isn't developing a young player, it's just watching a veteran hit .209. Maybe they want to see if Buscher has anything, but if he doesn't, it's back to Punto and L-Rod. Ugh.
I'm still against this: it's grotesque to throw in the towel for a half million when you just got handed half a billion in subsidies, especially if you're still in the race. But who knows, maybe Buscher will be better than Cirillo and we'll all be toasting Ryan in October.
by by jiminy on Aug 4, 2007 8:42 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
And actually...
by djskilbr on Aug 4, 2007 11:53 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Saving money
by rayken on Aug 5, 2007 1:26 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
whaddya know...
by by jiminy on Aug 9, 2007 1:26 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Getting Rid of RonDL
Unlike Cirillo, I'm not sure anybody would think it's even worth it. I bet both Ortiz and White are sitting out on waivers now with no takers.
by AdamOnFirst on Aug 5, 2007 1:12 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
bat
I realize that these moves can be absorbed somewhat but my view is that they are getting rid of solid role players and keeping the crap during a pennant drive to save a few bucks. If they don't get something good soon, WTF Over.
by doofus04 on Aug 3, 2007 7:52 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
bat
I realize that these moves can be absorbed somewhat but my view is that they are getting rid of solid role players and keeping the crap during a pennant drive to save a few bucks. If they don't get something good soon, WTF Over.
P.S. I hope enough fans quit going to the games to negate their savings if they don't do anything.
by doofus04 on Aug 3, 2007 7:54 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Was it just something I inferred...
I was glad to have him here, but I won't miss him.
by Neil on Aug 3, 2007 11:22 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
These Moves
So this could be a show of good will to future free agents.
Also, if he WASN'T well liked in the clubhouse, perhaps it was, I dunno, a way of appeasing that whole Castillo situation.
by AdamOnFirst on Aug 4, 2007 2:13 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Sadly......
Of course, I don't know ALL the stories about Cirillo...but I would rather have him coming off the bench as a pinch-hitter than four other guys currently available on the bench.
by twintown on Aug 4, 2007 5:28 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Cirillo and Castillo
If money is that big of an issue why sign Ponson and Ortiz anyway = 4.1 million? Ford 985k? I'm sure there's more if I think about it.
I know that thses 2 loses weren't that much to the team but why not wait until the end of the year if we are not going to aquire anything? Casilla was still comming up in September and Buscher is LH so Cirillo is still useful.
by doofus04 on Aug 5, 2007 11:53 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
In the Castillo trade...
I always trust TR in getting minor league value from guys. I don't believe in Butera, especially with Morales as good as he is, but this is encouraging from Martin.
I will forever reserve judgment on minor leaguers received by TR after the fact that we have what figures to be a well above average starting MI for a few years (Bartlett and Casilla) for the likes of Brian Buchanon and JC Romero.
by djskilbr on Aug 6, 2007 3:05 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs

by 














