No Regrets?
The Rays are about to eliminate the Bitch Sox from the playoffs (thank you Tampa) and two big contributors to this season are Jason Bartlett and Matt Garza. These two former Twins have played a big role for Tampa this year and it makes me wonder, Does anyone regret the trade now?
I know the Twins would never admit to any regrets but do any Twins fans feel that maybe the Twins got the short end of the stick, not just for this year but for the life of the trade? It’s hard for me not to feel that way b/c even after the trade most of us still feel the Twins need a shortstop (Bartlett) and even though the rotation was good this year, wouldn’t it be nice if we had a hard throwing pitcher like (Garza) on the Twins, allowing maybe Perkins to be moved to the pen or traded for another need.
There have been a few posts about how the Twins should move Delmon Young. For me, after the error in Toronto, I’d prefer not to see Pridie. As I posted in one of the last games, I have yet to see Pridie NOT fail for the Twins. That leaves Harris as the only player the Twins got that many feel happy with, and that is just as a platoon player at 3B.
I wonder if this is how the Giants fans felt after they got AJ from the Twins? I know there is nothing that can be done now and hindsight never helped anyone but for discussions sake I’m throwing this out there. I think the Twins got robbed, I just hope the front office can turn their lemons into lemonade.
0 recs |
16 comments
Comments
Well,
the Twins did not get “robbed”. Young, Harris, and Pridie were outplayed by Garza and Bartlett this year, but not by that much overall.
It was a win-win trade for both clubs when it happened. They needed starting pitching and a solid defensive presence up the middle of their infield. They also needed to get rid of their young egotistical right fielder who was becoming a clubhouse cancer.
We needed a power right handed hitter.
Now, I wasn’t a big fan of Young this year, and I still think he needs to go back to right field, but he is young and he does look like eventually hit for the power that we all expect – even if he did hit like a big pussy this season. If so, and if our young rotation solidifies with another year of experience it will still be a win-win situation.
by montanatwinsfan on Oct 6, 2008 11:19 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Lester, Lowrie, Masterson
Funny, I was going to write a similar post about how sad it is to see Lester, Lowrie, and Masterson playing key roles for the Red Sox in the postseason. Can’t help but wonder if the rumored Santana trade had gone down if they’d be doing the same thing in the playoffs but for us.
Also seeing Balfour doing well, and Bradford, who we could have had for free, is frustrating considering the holes in our bullpen probably killed us. Oh well.
But yes — Young could still become a superstar, sure, but I don’t think very many people wouldn’t take that trade back in a minute. It’s not over though. Maybe in three years Young and Gomez will be stars. If only they didn’t seem unwilling to learn, they’d be a lot easier to like.
by by jiminy on Oct 7, 2008 7:48 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
No regrets here.
Garza had a great year, but Bartlett wasn’t that special at the plate. Better than who we had, maybe, but we’re still years away from knowing who actually did get the better of this deal. For 2008, the Rays won—solely because of Garza. But five years from now, when Bartlett may or may not be playing, Delmon Young is in his prime and Deolis Guerra is just starting to make a name for himself, things might be very different.
Let’s say Garza goes on and is an integral part of the Rays’ post-season success en route to a World Series. I think that’s fantastic, but we won’t know whether he could have played that role for us or not. Different team, different circumstances, different past. If this were Star Trek we could see what happened in an alternate timeline, but sadly, there is no Lt. Cmdr. Data.
by Jesse on Oct 7, 2008 1:11 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I still
Don’t see how Garza can be a legit starting pitcher in this league throwing predominately fastballs. He has a very good fastball, but he doesn’t have great command. He still projects in my mind as a hard throwing 8th inning strikeout man like Grant Balfour, Matt Thornton, or LaTroy Hawkins when he was here.
Also, Delmon Young didn’t get into a fight with a teammate and force the Twins to send him to a sports psychologist. So the Twins have that…
by TMW on Oct 7, 2008 1:20 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Don't be too hasty
Garza stunk in April and was not very damn good in September. He was the No. 5 winner on the Rays’ staff.
I remain unconvinced that a near 25-year-old with a 19-22 career record a 2-1 SO/BB ratio is anything special.
He got past the fifth inning in one of his last 5 regular-season starts and was the only Rays’ starter to lose – he got blasted – to the Sox in the post-season. But he pitched poorly on the road this season, so he didn’t break out of his habit there.
You don’t judge a trade on one year, and to compare this to the AJ trade is a joke.
Bartlett. The guy has been hurt frequently during his pro career. We have likely seen the best of him. And the best was mediocre.
Considering Harris is “just a platoon player at third base,” he played more games than Bartlett, had basically the same PAs, more doubles, more triples, more home runs, more RBI, more RS, more walks and a higher OPS+.
So, in essence, the man the Tampa sports writers laughingly voted as the Rays’ MVP has a worse season than “just a platoon player.”
by Johnny Safron on Oct 7, 2008 7:53 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
so I shouldn't compare it to the AJ trade b/c the AJ trade took place more than a year ago?
There was a spell from June 8th to July 7th where Garza didn’t allow more than 3 runs and I think that was when the Rays were starting to wilt a bit. I think he was important to the Rays and has been an important part of their season.
As for Bartlett here is a guy the Rays are calling their MVP, meanwhile the Twins are still looking for a SS.
Seems to be a fair question with that in mind whether the Twins should have moved him.
Delmon is still young, so he could still pan out. The question seems to be will he stay with the Twins long enough for us to see it. I think Harris makes a good platoon player but I don’t him ever taking over a position. So yes, the final grade on this trade could be years away.
But in regards to the Giants, Giants fans I worked with at the time thought they were getting a solid bat and player for a no name (Boof), a minor leaguer w/ a history of injury (Liriano), and a starter who couldn’t hack it and was left in the pen (Nathan). Kinda how some of us thought we were giving up a hot head pitcher and serviceable SS for a power bat (Young). That’s why I saw some possible comparison.
Trust trying to stir conversation so I have a reason to visit the site
by caluofmn on Oct 7, 2008 10:32 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Exactly: you should not
1. No one in baseball judges a trade based on 300-some days.
2. Picking and choosing a 30-day scoreless period for Garza isn’t going to erase his mediocre career performance.
3. Again, Harris had a more productive season than Bartlett, and played as much.
4. From June 8 to July 7 the Rays played better than .650 baseball, in fact, they played far above their overall season percentage. No wilt.
5. Don’t really care what the Giants’ fans you “worked with” (what the hell does that mean?) thought of a trade. There is no qualification for being a fan, who cares what a random group of fans thought of the trade at the time? In fact, it just illustrates my point: don’t judge a trade too early.
6. Other than you deciding there’s some parallel here, how Trade A turned out has no bearing on how Trade B will turn out.
Why not choose the Doyle Alexander-John Smoltz trade as an example? No one knew after Smoltz’ inaugural season if the Braves got screwed or now.
How about John Smiley-Denny Neagle? Smiley won 16 games and pitched 241 innings for the Twins in ’92 (Radke never pitched 240; Santana? Nope.) and Neagle had three-straight losing seasons with abysmal ERAs – particularly bad for a non-DH league, no less. But 6 years down the road you could tell the Pirates came out on top in that deal, and not only did the Pirates then parlay Denny into Jason Schmidt, when their careers were over Neagle and Smiley were essentially the same pitcher – except both of them did the bulk of their work, and their best work, in jerseys that did not read “Twins.”
by Johnny Safron on Oct 7, 2008 11:20 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
some times people on this site are such huge experts
it makes me wish for the return of Batgirl where you could post thoughts and not have your head beaten in by their baseball knowledge.
5. Don’t really care what the Giants’ fans you "worked with" (what the hell does that mean?) thought of a trade. “what the hell does that mean?” well it would mean co-workers of mine who are huge Giants fans. Why would it mean anything else?
these moments are pretty rare but sometimes people here are too smart for their own good. Feel free to respond if you want, but I’m done, sorry I brought it up.
Maybe this site should have a test you have to pass before you are allowed to post.
by caluofmn on Oct 8, 2008 11:42 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I know I'd fail, but at least then I'd know to just cheer for the Twins w/out posting here
by caluofmn on Oct 8, 2008 12:08 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Ouch.
People get bees in their bonnets…it’s happened to me before, too. I think we still get some pretty solid discussion in certain threads. Don’t get too discouraged, we don’t all bite heads off.
by Jesse on Oct 9, 2008 3:40 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I guess that means...
…you agree that one year is enough time to judge a trade. And that the Bartlett trade is comparable to the AJ trade.
by Johnny Safron on Oct 10, 2008 9:26 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
The way I think of it, we have 5 Matt Garza’s in our starting rotation right now. He was expendible. Jason Bartlett is a good SS but he and nick punto had pretty much identical years.
I do think the Twins will benefit the most from the trade down the line.
by ianmader on Oct 8, 2008 2:06 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
the way I think of it
we have 3 better than Garza’s (at least at this point) in our rotation. Garza still is a good pitcher with plenty of potential and if he can get a good breaking ball (curve and change) and locate his fastball better, he will be pretty good. But we have at least 3 pitchers right now who are better than Garza: Liriano (of course), Baker (he is our ace), and Slowey (command pitcher). Garza could eventually become better than Baker and Slowey, but nowhere near as good as Liriano.
Of course, we have yet to see if Liriano will come back next year and dominate like he did in August and September and in 2006, but I have a pretty good idea that he will quickly be the new Santana…(better even!)
by 33MorneauMVP on Oct 8, 2008 2:47 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Did you feel this way a year ago?
MVP, I think I’ve made a couple of these comments in the last few days, so I don’t want to sound like I’m attacking you, but I think that we were all pretty high on Garza last year.I think his ceiling is higher than Baker, Slowey, Blackburn, Perkins, Guerra, Swarzak, etc. If the Twins could have, I think they would have given up anyone else last year (not sure about Liriano, but remember that he was injured). Garza throws harder, and has a good breaking ball, when he throws it well. When you account for injury risk, Garza is up there with all of our pitchers.
This time last year, we were all calling Garza a future #1, and dreaming of a rotation with Santana, Liriano and Garza.
by snolls on Oct 9, 2008 12:21 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Halo Effect
… and not the Anaheim Angles variety.
It’s well documented in psychology that a person’s opinion or rating of someone you like are skewed to the positive. You tend to see their strengths as stronger than they really are and you view their weaknesses as trivial, or less important.
Garza was a feel good story last year… a kid flying through the minors with above average stuff. Without actually seeing the kid pitch, it’s hard for anyone to not gloss over the weaknesses and focus on the upside.
Now that he’s out of the organization, and MN fans have less of a vested interest in his success, we can look at his ability a little more objectively, weighing the positives and negatives.
What would my life be like without the '91 World Series?
by MJesser on Oct 11, 2008 1:14 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 














