Twinkie Town: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
Around SBN: Post-UNC Thoughts

Joe Mauer Wins Gold Glove

Courtesy of Joe C. at the Strib online:

Joe Mauer won his first Rawlings Gold Glove Award today, becoming the first Twins catcher to win the award since Earl Battey in 1962.

That's a long time coming, but it's hard to find a reason why Joe Mauer doesn't deserve this award.  There have been some complaints about the number of passed balls he allows, but there's no doubt he's a talented force behind the plate as well as standing next to it.

I think it's getting easier to look at modern defensive metrics to get a better-than-superficial look at an individual's abilities in the field, but for catchers it's still a little more difficult.  While I really don't like using ERA as a stat for catchers, because it's a worse judge of their talents than it is for a pitcher, there are a few useful metrics available.  There will never be a substitute for watching how a catcher deals with his pitchers, the relationship they have and the game he calls, but we can measure his tools to see how effective he is against base runners, how confident teams are in running on him and how he comes out against the average catcher.

I've compiled a list of 14 American League catchers, using an arbitrary cutoff of 700 innings logged behind the plate.  This means no Miguel Olivo, no Mike Napoli and, sadly, no Mike Redmond.  But it should give us a comprehensive look at the league's primary catchers and how Joe Mauer and his first Gold Glove measure up.

The categories I've chosen are:  Innings, for durability at a position whose stresses put a larger toll on the body than any other except pitchers and their arms; Stolen Bases Attempted per Game, to give us an idea of how daring teams are on the basepaths when these 14 men are behind the plate; Caught Stealing Percentage, to see exactly how often runners are gunned down; Wild Pitches and Passed Balls per (nine inning) Game, which is sort of like WHIP; Win Shares (as a catcher only, no offense) to see contributions to the team in terms of victories; and Rate, which is like OPS+ except that it measures worth in terms of runs against average (for example, Joe's 104 rating means he's four runs better than an "average" catcher per 100 games).

Name Innings SBA/G CS% WP+PB/G WS Rate
Kurt Suzuki 1215.0 0.53 22.5 .207 11.0 104
Joe Mauer 1203.0 0.52 26.1 .329 9.2 104
A.J. Pierzynski 1134.1 0.84 9.4 .341 3.7 95
Jason Varitek 1041.1 0.60 18.8 .233 7.9 106
Ramon Hernandez 1039.1 1.04 17.5 .485 4.5 90
Dioner Navarro 1011.1 0.62 35.7 .365 7.3 118
John Buck 950.1 0.63 10.6 .436 4.9 92
Ivan Rodriguez 930.0 1.05 23.1 .322 9.4 100
Kelly Shoppach 872.2 0.48 21.3 .392 4.4 97
Kenji Johjima 833.1 0.77 26.8 .335 5.7 113
Jeff Mathis 793.1 0.83 21.9 .272 4.3 108
Rod Barajas 785.1 0.68 28.8 .264 6.9 113
Gerald Laird 753.0 0.87 27.4 .430 2.6 99
Jose Molina 737.0 0.90 43.2 .440 9.1 119

Across the board, Joe comes in looking pretty good.

*  He was the second most dependable in terms of time spent behind the plate, which is great to see after all the concern over his knees and legs.  I'm not sure the questions about playing time, fatigue and changing positions will every go away, but years like this should put a few qualms to rest.

*  Mauer had fewer attempts on his arm than all but Kelly Shoppach, with roughly just one stolen bases attempted every other game.  Let me just check my good meter here and....yes, that's good.

*  This year he caught just 26.1% of runners, which is far lower than the 47.5% mark he posted last season, but is also lower than the third he cut down from '04 - '06.  Caught Stealing percentages can vary pretty widely from year-to-year, but it's still worth mentioning that his sixth-best performance in the American League is also his career worst mark to date.  It should be noted that a number of things go into a catcher's success rate:  defensive ability of shortstops and second basemen and how they apply their tags or get into position, velocity of pitchers, how closly and when a first baseman holds his runners and, finally, how quick or slow a pitcher is to the plate and how closely they track their base runners.  Something positive I take out of this is the fact that, while his mark in this category is the lowest of his five-year career, there weren't significantly more attempts made to steal bases on his watch.

*  Joe also comes in sixth in the American League in the catcher's WHIP:  wild pitches plus passed balls per (nine inning) game.  At one stretch this year it seemed like every other game a ball was getting by Joe, and as a community that doesn't let much slip by them there were a number of comments on the dubious streak.  Indeed, on more than one occasion he tried to back hand a ball when he should have simply gotten in front of it, but the easy answer for me is that these things just happen, particularly over the course of a six month season where you're playing six days a week.  Good and bad streaks come and go, and knowing Mauer's apparent dedication to mental and physical discipline I have to believe that these sort of lapses won't continue.

*  Joe Mauer clearly kicks ass as a hitter, and most of his value will always come from the offensive facets of his game, but he clearly is a credit to his team behind the plate as well.  His 9.2 win shares are good for third in the American League.

*  Finally, his 104 Rate isn't the best of his career, but he still comes in safely above average.

After researching catcher's defensive metrics for the better part of my evening, and after looking at Mauer's history specifically, it's clear this wasn't his best season defensively.  Whether this was due to his playing time, was a by-product of a younger and more inexperienced pitching staff or whether it was just one of those years, there's only one thing that's clear to me:  if Joe Mauer was good enough to win the Gold Glove this season, then he was good enough to win it in 2005, 2006 and 2007.

Dioner Navarro could have been a candidate for this award, but isn't as fundamentally sound or consistent as Mauer.  Kurt Suzuki is fundamentally sound, and is a pretty good catcher period, but he doesn't have much of a reputation after finishing his second season with major league playing time at the age of 24.  He also isn't half the offensive unity, which shouldn't make a difference to who wins a Gold Glove but, strangely enough, does.  Finally, Jose Molina is a fantastic catcher in terms of tools, but a lot of balls got away from him this year and, more importantly, he only played 100 games this season.  It wouldn't matter if he threw out every batter (and really, for catchers, 43.2% is almost as good), that's just not enough playing time to win this award.

Congratulations to you, Joe Mauer!  You make Minnesota proud, and somewhere Earl Battey has a smile on his face.  Just 26 with two batting titles under his belt, he now has to make room for a Gold Glove.  That's just awesome.

0 recs  |  Comment 7 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Always good for a laugh

Gold Glove awards are the weakest trophy going, and anyone who thinks Carlos Pena had a better year in the field than Justin Morneau is a fool. Looking at the times that Pena hauled his glove out to first compared to Morneau should all by itself signal to those voting that further investigation is needed.

by Johnny Safron on Nov 6, 2008 10:49 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Uh....

Pena was actually very deserving of his award. He was the best defensive 1b in the AL this year. Tex was better for the full season but he spent less than half of that in the AL. Morneau’s very good, but Pena was better.

The bigger problems were: Pedroia (good, but not as good as Ellis), Michael Young (a travesty, almost as bad as Jeter), and the OF (Ichiro and Hunter mainly) which should have had Gomez and Gutierrez or Crawford at the least.

And the NL was really bad; Pujols should have been at 1b; Utley was the best defensive player in baseball this year and should have been the guy at 2b; Zimmerman should have won at 3b, and McLouth was HORRIBLE (worst OF in baseball) in the OF. Rob Neyer is dead-on in his analysis of the awards the last couple days for the most part.

by DJSkillz on Nov 7, 2008 12:07 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

And...

keeping in line with the point of this post, congrats to Joe Mauer! Well deserved and it’s been a long time coming. I think he can expect another 10 or so of these in his future.

People still don’t seem to fully appreciate what we have here. Joe Mauer is well on his way to being one of the best (if not THE best) catcher in the history of the game. We should all sit back and enjoy it.

by DJSkillz on Nov 7, 2008 12:11 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

It doesn't count in voting...

…but Pena’s defense was so pathetic in the post-season that I can only assume his few errors – in relatively few starts at first – were because his infielders were charged with them. He was awful over there in the post-season. Embarrassingly bad.

One measure for these lamer awards, such as Gold Glove and to some degree ROY, is games played. Pena started 132 games at first. Even if he were better than Morneau (you don’t tell me why you think Pena was better than Morneau, and simply making the statement carries no weight), Pena was only over there for 82 percent of his team’s games. He had 991 putouts and 106 assists. Translated, that’s Total Chances. He had two errors.

Morneau was on first for 96 percent of his team’s games. Right off the bat, this is a dealbreaker on any two players who appear to be close, and frankly, if you can convince me with some details why you think Pena is better, it can’t be by much. You can’t get much better than four errors in 1,405 chances. That’s right, Morneau had about 300 more chances than Pena, and it’s being in the game to make the plays that matters in baseball. The fact that both seem to be good, but Morneau was out there that much more often, closes the deal.

It’s amazing to me that the managers and coaches – I assume they are still the ones voting, and they never seem to do a very good job of it – could give Pena the nod when he wasn’t out there day in and day out.

Fielding is difficult to assess, and in the absence of you explaining why Pena is better than Morneau you really have no choice but to concede Morneau deserved the award. And don’t think I’m some Morneau backer. No one on this board has ripped him more than me, but the fact is ol’ Morny had one helluva year at first and he was out there every damned day. He deserved that award, even if Pena didn’t kick it around all season the way he did in the post-season.

by Johnny Safron on Nov 7, 2008 4:43 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

I 100% agree with you

Johnny! Here is the comparison of Morneau to Pena:

Morneau ousted Pena on double plays turned, games, innings, total chances, putouts, and range factor….Pena beat Morneau on the assists (outfielders got the ball into him faster), errors (2 in 132 GS :: 4 in 155 GS) and FPCT (which goes down with each error….give Pena as many chances in the field with as many innings and I think he would have committed about 6 errors.) Also, one of those errors charged to Morneau was due to his glove falling apart. Remember that play? His glove broke just as he caught it, and thus he dropped the ball (in SD). I was very upset with that error because it wasnt due to Morneau’s inefficiency but due to the glove.

I find this thing very screwed…also, go back through the season and look at the number of balls that Pena had to scoop compared to Morneau! Pena had fielders who 90% of the time could make a throw in the air (except Bartlett)…while Morneau had to consistently dig and scoop his fielders throws (Buscher, Harris, Everett, Punto, Lamb, etc.)

GOLD GLOVE AWARDS ARE SCREWED UP!!!!!!

by 33MorneauMVP on Nov 8, 2008 10:03 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

One...

I don’t value “errors”. I think they’re a BS stat that doesn’t tell you much.

Two, Pena made more plays above average than Morneau this year according to +/- rankings, even with games missed. I’ll take the word of the Fielding Bible over errors, personally. And Lyle Overbay and Kevin Youklis both performed better than Morneau there as well.

Morneau’s great defensively now, one of the best, but he wasn’t as good as Pena this year IMO. I have absolutely zero problem with that GG award. There’s a much, much better case for some of the others.

by DJSkillz on Nov 8, 2008 12:59 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

That's all very nice, but...

…a big part of life is just showing up. Pena neglected to do that.

One argument frequently given for Mattingly getting the Gold Glove nod over Hrbek was that Hrbek missed too many games. That at least dovetailed with the long-held notion that actually playing games at a position mattered to voters. The bottom line is Pena wasn’t on first base enough to warrant the award.

The Gold Glove has long been a joke. Jim Kaat won a ton of them, including one season when he made two errors in the same inning. That’s enough right there to excuse you from consideration – not that Kaat every argued with that. He knew that too often the award was a result of lazy voters who based a lot on reputation.

Reputation was not at work with Pena, but something was. He just didn’t deserve the award.

As for errors being BS, well, no more than batting average or RBI or wins or even ERA. There are lots of BS stats in baseball that are heavily influenced by umpiring and official scorers. Like I said, I didn’t see as much of Pena as I did of Morneau, but what I saw of him in the post-season was so dreadful that I actually looked up his stats. This was long before the voting. I concluded his low error total was the result of many factors, and that the stat was misleading based on his horrendous post-season display.

All that aside, though, Pena just didn’t play enough games at first to deserve it. It was a stupid verdict.

by Johnny Safron on Nov 8, 2008 3:56 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

TT is an SB Nation blog of, by and for the fans. We strive to be the best Minnesota Twins blog by providing quality content and analysis, as well as daily news and notes on the team. We hope you'll make Twinkie Town your home for all things Twins!
Start posting about the Twins »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Organization Review (Relief Pitchers)
Small
On Roy, Ramos, and RISK

Recent FanPosts

Small
Anybody want to talk revenues?
Joel87bw5_small
Signing up for the Minors
Small
Roy, Ramos, and RISK, Part II
Small
30 Cents on the Dollar = 2B Indifference
P1060527_small
New Uni Thoughts
Small
Minor League Report...November 14, 2009
Pose_small
Prediction Time (My Guess at 2010 Organizational teams)
Minnesota_twins_vinyl_baseball_small
New Uniforms on Monday

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Twinkie Town On Twitter

SPONSORS


Editor-In-Chief

Twinkietown_small Jesse

Senior Writer

Hrbek_small Jon Marthaler

The_jet_small cmathewson

Gladdentwins_small Adam Peterson

Hosken_powell_autograph_small RandBall's Stu