Minnesota Twins Winter Meetings Open Thread, Tuesday
9:11 pm - Check out the comments section, where it sounds like Bill Smith wasn't happy with Ron Gardenhire's comments last week on Delmon Young not being in his preferred outfield. I think my take is pretty clear.
It's past 3 am in my part of the world. I'll catch you all bright and early tomorrow for day three of the Winter Meetings!
7:57 pm - Things are a little slow at the moment, so we'll do some due dilligence on Kevin Kouzmanoff, like we did yesterday for Jack Wilson.
- Kouzmanoff, 27 for 2009, will become arbitration-eligible in 2010. He'll be under team control through 2012.
- Good raw power for a shortstop Only moderate raw power for a third baseman, with isolated power of .182 in 2007 and .173 in 2008.
- Has hit in one of the most difficult hitters parks for two years in Petco. At home, he's a career .243/.290/.390 hitter. As a visitor he hits .282/.330/.448.
- Entering his physical prime.
- In his career has swung at nearly a third of balls thrown outside the strike zone.
- Allergic to walks, attracted to strikeouts.
- RZR suggests mediocre range at his best: .680 in '07, .705 in '08. Makes some outs outside of his zone, but not a lot.
- In terms of cost (which would be in prospects), his production last year (.260/.299/.433) should help off-set the value he has through being under team control for four more years.
- My conclusion: Ultimately, while power and home runs are sexy, they aren't always accurate indicators of run production or whether or not a guy is a good hitter. In Kouz's case, I don't believe his potential for 20+ home runs off-sets the liklihood that, even away from Petco, he'd probably be lucky to post an OBP of .330. But having said that, I still prefer him to Jack Wilson.
We've just condensed today's history, so if you want to scroll back through every other little things that's come down the wire today, be sure to open the entire post.
7:06 pm - How was dinner? Delicious? If you're not full yet, munch on this...
- Phil Miller at the Pioneer Press says that the Twins' young pitching staff is getting a lot of attention. As much as your pettite, brunette girlfriend? Depends.
- The Pirates are interested in David Eckstein. This has been discussed in the comments already, but I'd think the Twins would have some interest in him. He seems like their type.
- Over at Yahoo, Jeff Passan says the Astros are pushing Miguel Tejada...but nobody's interested.
5:19 pm - A mid-day update from LEN III:
- Here we go AGAIN: La Velle says Minnesota and Colorado HAVE had discussions about Garrett Atkins, and this is "according to a person with knowledge of talks". Sounds like the Rockies still wanted a starter and a prospect, and naturally, the Twins still said no.
- Neal thinks this last request wasn't as ridiculous as Colorado's request last week, which involved Kevin Slowey and Denard Span.
- Huston Street DID come up, but the Rockies feel they'll need him at this juncture.
- Ultimately, in regards to Colorado and Atkins, LEN III has this to say: "What’s coming to light here is that the Twins really want to hold on to their core of young starters. Perhaps they feel that this isn’t the year - or Atkins isn’t the player - to give up a starter for."
- Neal confirms, yet again, that Young-to-Tampa will not happen. I'd say this one is dead, but every time I do that I get contradicted. So I'll say nothing. You know what I'm thinking.
- Finally, the Phillies really like Nick Punto.
5:12 pm - Kelly Theiser, our familiar correspondent at MLB.com, has contradicted a report from ESPN's Jayson Stark, saying:
But a source close to the situation indicated Tuesday afternoon that it's highly unlikely [a trade between the Twins and Rays involving Delmon Young] would occur.
Of course, "unlikely" doesn't mean "impossible", but at this point it doesn't look good. This also confirms LEN III's update from this afternoon. In other news...
Theiser also says the Rockies have called about Delmon Young, but with Troy Renck saying that Colorado hasn't discussed Garrett Atkins with anyone, anyone care to speculate on who the Twins could be targeting?
4:05 pm - Nothing solidly Twins-related here, unless you count indirect sort of things...
- Over at the Denver Post, Troy Renck says the Rockies haven't been talking to anyone about Garrett Atkins. I'm not sure if this is accurate, but if it is, it legitimizes my threesome joke in the 3:01 update.
- Todd Zolecki at The Phillies Zone says Pat Burrell is unlikely to return to Philadelphia, and speculates that Philly's top three alternatives don't include Delmon Young.
- Livan Hernandez continues to find work.
- I'm still finding dog hairs for a dog I no longer have. WTF. (FYI, this is NOT Twins-related.)
3:01 pm - Just saw a brief update at LEN III's blog. Sounds like there isn't much chance of a Ménage à Trois between the Twins, Rays and [INSERT TEAM HERE]. Apparently Delmon Young doesn't provide sufficient protection.
Too much?
2:30 - Afternoon updates:
- ESPN's Steve Phillips now says it "seems unlikely" that the Rockies will trade Garett Atkins.
- Apparently, Scott Erickson wants to make a comeback; the Twins told him to try his luck in winter ball first.
- K-Rod officially signed with the Mets.
- LEN3 reports that Jorge Cantu can't throw and eventually will end up at first base. I'd say that rules him out of the Twins' plans, but then again, they did sign Adam Everett.
12:35-- ESPN is reporting that the Dodgers have signed Blake, as expected--cmathewson
11:45 am - LEN3 checks in for the morning. Among his tidbits:
- The team has had internal discussions regarding Kevin Kouzmanoff, Jorge Cantu, and Ty Wigginton - but internal discussions don't cause trades. No word yet on whether the Twins have actually inquired about any of the three.
- Elsewhere, the Mets are close to landing K-Rod, says Ken Rosenthal, for 3 years-$37 million and a vesting option for a fourth year that would bring it up to $50 million. That's right in line with what the Twins are paying Joe Nathan (who signed for 4 years, $47 million, and a team option on the fifth year.)
10:30 am - A wild rumor from ESPN's Jayson Stark has Tampa Bay potentially re-acquiring Delmon Young, contrary to all of yesterday's reports that such a move was absolutely dead in the water. In return, the Rays would deal Edwin Jackson or Andy Sonnanstine, but not to the Twins - who don't need pitching one bit; a third team would likely be involved, possibly the Rockies (who would thus dangle Garrett Atkins).
9:00 am - Jon Marthaler checking in here. No big news yet this morning.
- At the Strib, LEN3 quotes team officials as saying that the Twins have the financial flexibility to add players. Which, of course, means nothing, since the front office will continue to throw around nickels like they're manhole covers. But I suppose it's nice to hear.
- Elsewhere, several sources have reported that the Brewers are still in the running to hold onto CC Sabathia - but then again, they're also rumored to be on the verge of re-signing Mike Lamb, in which case they're clearly not trying to put the best possible team on the field anyway.
6:00 am - Update number one, let's roll through the overnight stuff...
- Courtesy of Tim Brown at Yahoo, it sounds like the Rangers are trying to shop Michael Young. His five-year, $80 million dollar extension kicks off in 2009. Think the Twins have interest?
- Conflicting reports on Casey Blake's potential deal with the Dodgers last night. Jayson Stark says it's two years, Ken Rosental says three years, $17 million.
- Jenifer Langosch at MLB.com says the Twins aren't pursuing Jack Wilson after all, but there are a few conflicting reports to this as well.
- From Phil Miller, Assistant GM Rob Antony gave what was interpreted as body language stating that the Twins weren't interested in Miguel Tejada. I hope it's true.
87 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Delmon to Giants Rumor
Haven’t seen any details here, but the Delmon-SF rumor I’ve heard is somewhat interesting. Delmon to SF, Jonathan Sanchez and Emmanuel Burriss to Minnesota.
Jonathan Sanchez, LHP
2008 MLB: 158 IP, 154 H, 75 BB, 157 SO, 14 HR
Overall SO/BB: MLB: 9.07 SO / 4.54 BB Minors: 11.88 SO / 3.50 BB
Emmanuel Burriss, switch hitting SS/2B, 2006 first rounder, 23 years old
2008 MLB: 240 AB, .283/.357/.329/686, 13 SB / 5 CS
MLB line very similar to his career minor league line of .285/.347/.338/685
104 SB / 31 CS in 3 minor league seasons (820 AB)
Made the jump directly from A+ in 2007 to AAA/MLB in 2008.
No information on him defensively
Last year, BA rated him as #10 prospect in SF system, fastest baserunner
Last year, Sickels rated him a “C”, with “massive doubts about his bat” and total lack of power
One problem with this trade would be what we do with Sanchez. We’d have 6 SP for 5 spots in the rotation. Sanchez would likely be a bit below Blackburn and Perkins, in that #4-5 mix. It could free us up to trade another pitcher though…perhaps Perkins to Seattle for Beltre.
Burriss is another question mark here. If I knew he was a gold glove caliber defensive SS, this would be more intriguing. He’s a slap hitting, bottom of the order SB guy. One thing would be for sure. Add Burriss at the #9 spot in the order, you have Gomez-Burriss-Span-Casilla SICK speed at 8-9-1-2. Pitchers would have migraines…
In the end, I’d look to have SF add a pitching prospect or good bullpen arm (not sure what they have), or better yet, upgrade Sanchez-Burris into Matt Cain. If we could get Cain for Young (and perhaps Harris/Buscher), I’d be willing to turn him or Slowey around to Milwaukee to get JJ Hardy. We’d still need to fill 3B, but we’d have SS set.
Thoughts?
La Velle
said this won’t happen. He said he heard Sanchez as well, but that the Twins have no need for more pitching like that. He mentioned that their only option there would be moving him to the bullpen and they’d rather go somewhere else if that’s what they’re going to do.
I hadn’t seen the other name before, but that could be interesting. Anybody have more info on him?
by Twins Territory on Dec 9, 2008 9:25 AM EST up reply actions
I don't hate it
It would allow them to turn around and trade a pitcher, whether Sanchez or someone else, but I don’t have a lot of faith in Burriss as a starting quality player; that lack of power is just too severe.
by Eric in Madison on Dec 9, 2008 11:32 AM EST up reply actions
Lack of power
is very severe. He seems more like an eventual backup candidate to me. I’d be more tempted if SF had a quality bullpen arm we like, but not much seems to be there. I push for Cain (not that that’s going to happen).
by Adam Peterson on Dec 9, 2008 12:03 PM EST up reply actions
Yeah, I have a hard time
seeing them give up Cain for Young. I certainly wouldn’t do that if I were them.
It’s odd. It seems as if there are several teams at least somewhat interested in Young. I would hope that the Twins could parlay that into something useful, though of course these teams might be looking at Young as an inexpensive alternative given his disappointing season.
by Eric in Madison on Dec 9, 2008 12:36 PM EST up reply actions
I thought you guys might like this

Anyway, as I was lying in the puddle, I think I may have found a way for us to get Bonds and Griffey, and we wouldn't have to give up that much.
~George Costanza~
by Sandy Kazmir on Dec 9, 2008 8:00 PM EST up reply actions 2 recs
Looks like...
…the Yankees are interested in Punto as a utility player. Add them to the long list including the Dodgers, Diamondbacks, Mets, Phillies and Twins.
I think the only way we’d get him is if we made him a starter at short in ’09.
Also, just saw on Rotoworld that a “bunch” of teams have called on Bonser. The Twins reportedly like how he did in the bullpen and would rather keep him…
Michael Young
Some interest, but not much. At a cost of 5 years / $80M, I’d rather sign Rafael Furcal to 4 years / $40M, bad back and all. Wouldn’t involve us losing pitching prospect(s), which presumably Texas would ask for.
Offensively, Young has dropped off pretty sharply the last couple years…especially in slugging. Don’t pay for the player he was in 2005 and 2006.
No interest in Young
He’s a gold glover because of reputation at this point, similar to Hunter. And his OPS+ last year was lower than Punto’s. The previous two years, he was league average offensively. And all those numbers were put up in the most hitter friendly park in the AL. Last year’s line away from the launching pad: .264 /.317 /.364/ .680
"You're thinking too much. Just have fun." -- Bennie "The Jet" Rodriguez in Sandlot
I agree
I think I’d rather go with Furcal…
by Twins Territory on Dec 9, 2008 10:50 AM EST up reply actions
Ugh
Young is also 31, meaning that the team that acquires him will be paying $16 million for a 36-year-old middle infielder. I doubt there are many 36-year-old middle infielders worth $6 million, much less $16 million.
As cmath said, he was sub-Punto last year away from Arlington, and his career line away from there is only .279/.323/.404. Basically, I am opposed to acquiring pretty much any “marquee” offensive player whose success came with the Rangers or Rockies.
"There are only two things that are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former." - Albert Einstein
Let Texas live
with another bad contract. No way he’s worth $16M, much less half that (assuming Texas would pick up rest of contract)…
by Adam Peterson on Dec 9, 2008 12:01 PM EST up reply actions
Not as expensive, but the answer is still no
Four Teams Inquire on Michael Young
$20M of the $80M has already been paid via bonus. No way I give up young pitching and take on that contract…
by Adam Peterson on Dec 9, 2008 2:15 PM EST up reply actions
agreed
Furcal can be had for a shorter time period and less money, he’s been pretty resilient before this past year so injuries don’t concern me too much. I want no part of Young. However, if Ian Kinsler is at all available that would be amazing.
Peyton's good but have you ever heard of Jeff George?
Delmon back to Rays
Interesting, but I bet it would be a pretty big discount from what we paid to get him. Has his value really dropped that low?
The three-way trade scenario is intriguing. It would effectively be Young for Atkins (from our perspective). While Atkins is not my favorite option (home-road splits really scare me, below average fielder), he’s better than many. All depends on whether we think Atkins can hit for an 800+ OPS and 25+ HR, as well as what we plan to do with SS. Boy it would be the offseason coup if we were then able to turn around and trade for JJ Hardy or sign Furcal.
Jesse
Awesome work over the last 2 days.
Excellent work distraction.
Thanks!
But the other guys have done a lot of the lifting today for me. They deserve credit as well.
It's a compliment...
… that some of my updates today were just assumed to be coming from Jesse.
by Jon Marthaler on Dec 9, 2008 4:53 PM EST up reply actions
Blake
ESPN is reporting [http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/news/story?id=3756550] that Casey Blake resigned with the Dodgers for a reported 3 year 17 mil. deal.
link please?
Peyton's good but have you ever heard of Jeff George?
Hmmm
I have insider and I’m not finding anything. I don’t use the insider option very much but I keep forgetting to unsubscribe to it so I don’t know my way around all of its “bonuses”. I would think it would have popped up on mlbtraderumors by now though
Peyton's good but have you ever heard of Jeff George?
Anything new on this?
Haven’t seen anything anywhere which makes it hard to believe. La Velle or someone would have info on it. Also, with teams like the Yankees, Mets, etc. in on him, you’d think unless the Twins offered him a starting spot, they could offer more than what the Twins would for a bench guy.
Not saying it isn’t true, but I think it might take more time for him to sign and I’ve seen nothing.
by Twins Territory on Dec 9, 2008 2:55 PM EST up reply actions
It all goes back to
Nick N and the Keith Law post he made when he emailed him about being Biased against the Twins. Really quite funny if you know the joke.
1941 .406
Don't know the joke actually...
…but, as I’ve said before, I love N&N. One of the best three Twins blogs out there, no doubt.
and
http://www.battleyourtailoff.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=14295&st=0&sk=t&sd=a&start=30
That’s the backround.
1941 .406
I kinda like the idea...
…of Kouzmanoff. I just wrote about him, but I don’t want to come here and just post links to my site.
Always feel free to do that, I don't mind cross-traffic.
Personally I don’t like Kouz, but I’ll certainly take a look at what you’ve got.
I wish SOMETHING would happen.
I just hate that it seems like it’ll be another year where we do something minor at short and third and wait until free agency in ’09.
kouz
I like Kouz too. I wouldn’t mind getting him. He seems like a cheaper version of Casey Blake. We would have control for 5 years…
He also makes an out over 70% of the time
If Gomez is in the lineup, no thanks.
by TMW on Dec 9, 2008 4:24 PM EST up reply actions
Park Effects
That’s largely a product of Petco Park, which is a hitter’s nightmare. His road OPS (both career and last season) is roughly .330, which I’d consider acceptable given his power.
For comparison to another bandied-about Twins 3B target, if you take him and Garrett Atkins out of their ridiculous home parks and compare their road splits, Kouzmanoff comes across as a clearly superior hitter – same OBP and about 50 extra points of SLG. I’ll admit that’s slightly biased against Atkins (Kouz gets to count some games at Coors while Atkins doesn’t, and Atkins picks up games at Petco that Kouz loses), but not enough that I believe Atkins is a better hitter.
"There are only two things that are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former." - Albert Einstein
The Twins...
…didn’t contact him, he called the Twins and was told that.
by Twins Territory on Dec 9, 2008 4:31 PM EST up reply actions
I Know
I Couldnt Believe it when i saw it….Major League Baseball: Where Being 40 and wanting to play again happens.
I see...
The first report was shocking to me too…
by Twins Territory on Dec 9, 2008 4:55 PM EST up reply actions
He could barely throw 90 in his prime...
…can he touch 85 now? What could he possibly throw that would make him effective?
In the booth this summer
He was a real jag when he guested in the booth for an inning this summer. I want to say it was whent he Red Sox were in town. Any time Dick and Bert wanted to include him on the calls, talk about the current team, or talk about the 91 team he managed to bring it back to plugging some stupid baseball movie he was producing each and every time.
by TMW on Dec 9, 2008 4:41 PM EST up reply actions
Tampa Bay people
say this report is “a joke” and it won’t happen.
by Twins Territory on Dec 9, 2008 4:56 PM EST up reply actions
Update From Lavelle
The Rockies and Twins have Talked about a deal for 3B Garret Atkins….The Rockies Want a Pitcher an a Prospect…Twins arent willing to go that far…Last week they said give us Slowey and Span for Atkins…..No WAY!
Huston Streets name also came up…Rockies dont want to deal him because they think they wont resign Brian Fuentes so They want to keep him as setup guy to Manny Corpas.
Also from Lavelle
Two Sources close to the Rays have said the report of Delmon to Tampa in a 3 team trade is Dead.
This has been confirmed by a number of sources.
And rightly so. Let’s kill that one. If Delmon is getting traded, it shouldn’t be back to Tampa Bay.
Surprising that the Twins
Name hasnt come up in the David Eckstein/Rafael Furcal/Orlando Cabrera Discussions.
I'm surprised, too.
DE – He’s a Twins kind of guy, I’m sure they kicked the tires on him at least. They could do a lot worse.
RF – High risk, high reward kind of guy. Even with their financial flexibility, it’d be an aggressive move for a club like Minnesota.
OC – There were grumblings about him and the Twins last month (I think, but I could be wrong), but I’m glad there’s no real interest here. He’s a pretty big zero if you’re looking for an upgrade.
Livan
hasn’t signed. This was reported, but they’re saying the dude got Livan mixed up with Ramon Hernandez who was traded to the Reds today.
Oops!
The Cardinals are going to sign Cesar Izturis. Not that I or the Twins are interested. Just thought I should note that another shortstop free agent will be gone.
I'm Almost Starting to Think
That the Twins are going to Keep with Brendan Harris/Matt Tolbert at Short
If that happens i’m gonna riot. BURN THE NEW BALLPARK…JK
I'd be okay with that...
…the Harris/Tolbert bit at short that is. But only if the Twins upgrade at third base. One of those two positions needs to be addressed if this team expects to get significantly better this season.
The Phillies
said that they “really like Punto” after a meeting today. La Velle said when a Twins guy heard this he said “we do too”.
I think the Twins might look to bring him back if they decide to go after a guy to play third instead of short.
Oops
I saw the Phillies thing above earlier and still wrote that…
by Twins Territory on Dec 9, 2008 7:03 PM EST up reply actions
I'm not opposed to bringing Punto back.
But I have to see that as a backup option. Like you said, if third base ends up getting an upgrade, then retaining Punto at short for defensive purposes isn’t a bad thing. As long as it’s not a ridiculous deal, he’s a guy I can live with.
Me either
I’d be fine with having him at short if we do something at third. I think we MUST upgrade at one of the two positions.
by Twins Territory on Dec 9, 2008 7:37 PM EST up reply actions
I'm desperate for any solid news at this point.
Viking Vigil - The 2nd greatest Vikings community on the internet!
http://www.vikingvigil.com
Twins Fix
http://www.twinsfix.com
Me too.
I’d like for something to happen, as long as it’s a good something. I don’t want to sign Kyle Farnsworth to a three-year, $24 million dollar deal or anything. But it would be nice to hear that the Twins had a solid lead on a decent proposal.
Agreed
However, if nothing at all happens for a few more days I’d almost be willing to accept a bad deal.
Viking Vigil - The 2nd greatest Vikings community on the internet!
http://www.vikingvigil.com
Twins Fix
http://www.twinsfix.com
Gardy
said tonight that if Punto is back, he’ll be the starting shortstop. Quite a comment, it could draw him back. Also, he said Casilla could be at short if they found a 2B instead of a SS or 3B. Orlando Hudson? Probably not.
Also, he said Smith wasn’t happy with his Young comments, and he said he didn’t mean for them to be taken that way.
Still nothing good as far as possible moves.
Good stuff.
I’m glad Smith wasn’t happy with Gardy’s comments. It’s way too early to say who WILL or will NOT be in the outfield, and if the organization wants to keep Delmon Young, having the coach say he isn’t in the preferred outfield cannot be good for relations. Going the other way, telling other teams that a guy you’re thinking about trading isn’t good enough to crack your starting lineup through a careless quote in the media—that’s just dumb.
Bottom line is that nothing good can come from quotes like that, from anyone much less the coach. Even if it were just for motivational purposes, which it probably wasn’t, the negatives outweigh the positives. It’s a rare mistake by Gardenhire with the media, but it was a dumb one.
Aaron Gleeman
wrote on the Rotoworld blog that while nobody told him anything, he got the sense in his interview with Gardy and Smith tonight that they are going to move Young. He said they didn’t directly answer his questions and that he read in-between the lines that they’ll move him.
He also noted that while they say they aren’t shopping him, if they weren’t, his name wouldn’t come up as often as it has with so many different teams.
by Twins Territory on Dec 9, 2008 10:27 PM EST reply actions
One correction
Kouzmanoff is a third baseman, and a poor one at that. I shudder to think of hi playing short.
"You're thinking too much. Just have fun." -- Bennie "The Jet" Rodriguez in Sandlot
new rumor guys
joquain beniot for boof bonser, what would you guys think about this?
everything Rays,Marlins,Twins and Reds
I'd do it in a heart beat
"You're thinking too much. Just have fun." -- Bennie "The Jet" Rodriguez in Sandlot
ill even throw in matt guerrier as well
but anything involving matt guerrier and throwing usually ends up going 400+ feet
everything Rays,Marlins,Twins and Reds
Link please?
Or is that just your speculation?
Viking Vigil - The 2nd greatest Vikings community on the internet!
http://www.vikingvigil.com
Twins Fix
http://www.twinsfix.com
by Andersklasen on Dec 10, 2008 1:44 AM EST up reply actions
http://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2008/12/twins-inquire-o.html
I just saw it too. eh, I don’t know might be ok. I don’t know much about Benoit, anyone else know much? I guess if we can get something for Boof that’s great.
Peyton's good but have you ever heard of Jeff George?
He's a decent pitcher...
…here’s his report. He struggles with command (only 57% of his fastballs end up strikes – 64% is the league average) and efficiency. He has a lot of long at-bats, but has a great off-speed pitch…well above-average stat-wise.
Here is Bonser’s report card. The overall grades are the same, but Bonser isn’t below average in any of the selected categories.
Here are the two’s scouting reports – Bonser and Benoit.
Pitch-wise, Benoit only has three pitches – a fastball, slider, and changeup. The biggest difference would be the off-speed, as Bonser rarely throws it. Benoit rarely throws the slider, so most of his pitches will be a variety of fastballs and changeups. (Again, Benoit’s changeup is good – opponent’s bat .220 against it.)
Bonser’s curve would be greatly missed, though. I don’t think I’m for this trade after looking at the numbers. I certainly wouldn’t do it in a “heartbeat”, like Cmathewson would. Could you explain your thinking, Cmath?
Viking Vigil - The 2nd greatest Vikings community on the internet!
http://www.vikingvigil.com
Twins Fix
http://www.twinsfix.com
by Andersklasen on Dec 10, 2008 2:22 AM EST up reply actions
Upside
I think Benoit has more upside than Bonser. He’s basically a two pitch pitcher—he shows his slider. If he can get better command of the slider and fastball, he’s a future dominating closer. Bonser’s upside is a quality middle reliever at best. I think we’ve seen his upside in the last two months of 2008, and that’s pretty good, but not closer material.
One thing though: I thought Benoit was younger. So it’s not as clear to me as it was last night. If you haven’t reached your upside by age 30, there’s a good chance you never will.
"You're thinking too much. Just have fun." -- Bennie "The Jet" Rodriguez in Sandlot
Intriguing
This could be a change of scenery trade that helps both teams. I think Bonser could be a good bullpen arm once he knows from day one he’s going to be in the pen. Benoit is intriguing. Had a real nice stretch from 2005-2007 (FIP: 3.95, 3.37, 3.17 according to Fangraphs) and took a step backward last year (5.29, with 35 walks in 45 innings). He’s 30 years old, signed for $3.5M next year, then becomes a free agent.
We’d be giving up team control of Boof for the next 3-4 years for one year of Benoit. I’d be inclined to say no. Bill James and Marcel project Benoit a little better than Boof next year 4.24/4.24 vs 4.36/4.38 FIP. Not enough of a gap to make up for the difference financially. Boof is still a piece we can probably move to an NL team looking for #4 – #5 starter and get better bullpen help in return.
by Adam Peterson on Dec 10, 2008 7:18 AM EST up reply actions
Sabathia to Yankees
Joel Sherman is reporting in today’s New York Post that CC Sabathia will sign with the Yankees. Sherman was interviewed this morning by Mike&Mike and said Cashman made a trip to SF to meet with Sabathia’s family. Sealed the deal.
I suspect is was as much a matter of no west coast team coming close to 6/140
What happens now…?
What happens now?
The Yankees get a guy who has whizzed down his leg in virtually all of his post-season starts.
This man is not a big-game pitcher.
by Johnny Safron on Dec 10, 2008 8:02 PM EST up reply actions

by 




















