All Hail the Triumph of the Blogosphere
Thanks be to God for the decline of the newspaper industry and the rise of the blogosphere. As the guy who plays Mose Schrute said on the recent Costas Now, our democracy is much better off with many voices contributing. And Balls Deep is right; access is so overrated when we now have the internet. After all, it usually just corrupts the journalist.
I appreciate the fact that I have learned so much more about the war in Iraq with AaronGleeman.com’s embedded reporting from the Green Zone. And it is admirable that Deadspin too time out from gossiping about journalists and athletes to allocate resources to reporting on Tibet and the Beijing Olympics.
Even the Huffington Post interrupted its fact-checking to send a reporter to an otherwise mundane zoning meeting to break the news that agri-business received clearance to install more Concentrated Animal Feedlot Operations close to groundwater, rivers and lakes in rural Minnesota.
Newspapers are a thing of the past. Access is important, but only when it is taking cell-phone pictures of Matt Leinart chugging beers with co-eds. Other than that I want my journalists to be regular guys like me: sitting on the couch eating nachos and making snarky comments. Our democracy depends on this “gut feeling” rather than expertise (or travel budgets). Look at our current commander-in-chief. There’s a guy who goes with his gut.
0 recs |
11 comments
Comments
OT: Access
Yeah, we see maybe 5% of the war in Iraq: Usually just the things that the military can’t prevent from being leaked, and then usually foreign journalists leaking it. How many stories have you read about the Iraqi death toll? We rarely read stories about American soldier casualties. Can you say how many American soldiers have been killed or wounded since the start of the war? I didn’t think so. Apparently access isn’t everything. You know it’s bad when the Sunday Strib puts the release of a video game that celebrates the fine art of murder on the front page and the war in Iraq on page 12.
The newspaper industry is in dire straights not just because of the Internet. It is dying the death it should have died long before the Internet. People have been starved for real information since Vietnam, when the government and the military industrial complex figured out that the only way to control the flow of information was to buy the media and deploy the same kinds of propaganda campaigns used by the Nazis.
After 30 years of this, the three largest channels are now owned by companies that make weapons. The cable channels and most of the radio stations are owned by a complete nut job who is also heavily invested in military contractors—Rupert Murdoch, who’s goal is to own everything. Most of the papers are owned by the same companies. This says nothing about how the advertising industry has had its mitts in the content side of the house for decades.
Is it any wonder that people prefer to get their information from the Internet? The news industry suffers from complete credibility loss. Only until they get back to the basics of a separation of the business side of the house from the content side of the house will they regain their credibility. The problem is, the more they suffer, the more influence the business side has on content.
I’ve seen it happen first hand. I was the editor of a national magazine that died a slow death after we lost our big advertisers to bankruptcy when the dot-com bubble burst. Every day, the publisher had a new scheme to get more revenue that involved compromising our journalistic code. I had to pick my battles, and I lost more than I won. I kept telling them that we were losing readers for the sake of short-term revenue. They didn’t want to hear it. When you lose readers, you lose everything. And that is ultimately what happened. The publication was shut down four years after the bubble burst.
This story is being repeated all over the country. You either consolidate to slow your own death or you die. Eventually, it will all be on the Internet, and credibility will be the only determining factor as to whether a site lives or dies, which is what the media should be about anyway.
"You're thinking too much. Just have fun." -- Bennie "The Jet" Rodriguez in Sandlot
by cmathewson on May 3, 2008 1:18 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Dead
4,066 dead Americans in Iraq is the current count, so you can say that, just saying. You said nobody could tell you. Now, let me move on to my response to the article as a whole.
I’ll be speaking mostly with regards to sports coverage. Access in sports coverage, isn’t necessary for a lot, if not most, things. It is necessary to tell us about what the manager thinks about his center fielder or what your second baseman is trying to do too improve his jumps on stolen bases or whatever, but it doesn’t half much at all for analysis. In fact, it probably hurts it because you can’t say negative things about the team or you’ll lose your source of quotes.
Quite frankly, the quality of sports analysis, or let’s stay specifically with baseball analysis, is terrible in almost all newspapers. Things are printed often that are irrelevant, misleading, or flat out false. Cookie cutter columns are frequently run and re-run just to meet the deadline (ex, every time Eckstein’s team comes to town, somebody writes a column about how good and scrappy he is, despite the fact that is a well sub-par hitter and a poor defender, although, his defensive inadequacies are MORE masked at second base). That is why the blogosphere is gaining in popularity.
And Leitch failed too hammer home a couple points on that show that I think he should have kept emphasizing. The blogs with poor writing, bad analysis, stupid topics, DON’T GET READ. it isn’t a newspaper where once you’re in, you’re delivered too people’s doorsteps everyday and those people are stuck reading you either way. With a blog, it takes a lot of long, hard, quality work to build a readership.
Quite frankly, I can’t speak to other forms of news, because I haven’t gotten into reading non-sports, or really even non-baseball blogs. I think there are clearly some kinds of reporting that require accessed reporters (any war is a good example) but even then, it doesn’t require they be NEWSPAPER reporters. I could write a whole book on my frustrations with the newspaper industry, but it’s not the time or place here. To me, it’s become pretty clear that the expertise in the baseball coverage field is squarely NOT in the newspaper portion.
"You can't sit on a lead and run a few plays into the line and just kill the clock. You've got to throw the ball over the damn plate and give the other man his chance. That's why baseball is the greatest game of them all."
~ Earl Weaver
"In God we trust. All others must provide evidence."
~ Billy Beane
by AdamOnFirst on May 3, 2008 5:30 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I said dead and wounded
How many wounded.
"You're thinking too much. Just have fun." -- Bennie "The Jet" Rodriguez in Sandlot
by cmathewson on May 3, 2008 10:59 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
This I agree with
The blogs with poor writing, bad analysis, stupid topics, DON’T GET READ
That is as it should be. And, As I said, all media are going that way. Newspapers don’t get read as much because they don’t pass muster as they cost more than online sources. If high quality, credible sources exist online, why waste your time and money on the crap that passes for print journalism these days?
"You're thinking too much. Just have fun." -- Bennie "The Jet" Rodriguez in Sandlot
by cmathewson on May 3, 2008 11:54 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
This post doesn't make much sense, cooley
Admittedly I’ve never read Deadspin, The Huffington Post, or Gleeman. In fact I haven’t read too many blogs at all. There is a reason for that. Blogs are mostly opinion, and some analysis, and almost never news or “reporting.” (except , I suppose for blogs of individuals “embedded” with the military or a sports team).
Not even the news-based blogs that I have read: MSNBC political blogs, Chris Mathews, Keith Olbermann claim to be either “news” or “reporting.”
Certainly none of the sports blogs I occassionally peruse claim to provide either news or reporting. They do, however, sometimes offer some very good writing, and some very good analysis. Jesse, John Bonnes, Ubelmann and co., Fire Joe Morgan, and Batgirl, are all great examples of how well, how intelligently, and how humorously some people can write; yes, even people who don’t have jobs with a newspaper (although I clearly am not on that list).
If you are reading blogs to get your news or your reporting, than I guess the joke is on you.
I would suggest that you give up blogs unless you are interested in the bloger’s opinion, their writing style, or their analysis of a subject that interests you (and even then I would choose carefully). I also suggest you give up this stupid rant that pits one form of “information” against the other in some sort of twisted head to head competition.
by montanatwinsfan on May 3, 2008 9:29 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
darn I wish there was an "edit" button
I’d take out the word stupid in front of rant, and I would add in a sentence that I forgot to add in before about how I really haven’t read many blogs so maybe there are some who claim to be providing “news”, “reporting” or “journalism”. just not any of the blogs that I have ever seen.
by montanatwinsfan on May 3, 2008 9:34 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Not to be argumentative
But you do realize you’re posting on a “blog,” right?
by Neil on May 4, 2008 2:36 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Chum on the waters
Looks like you hauled in your limit of monster polynemus pontificatus with that satire, WC.
Catching a fly ball is a pleasure. Knowing what to do with it after you catch it is a business.
by Firpo Marberry on May 3, 2008 9:42 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
So are you the polynemus?
Or do you just like to pontificate? I’m trying to figure out which.
"You're thinking too much. Just have fun." -- Bennie "The Jet" Rodriguez in Sandlot
by cmathewson on May 3, 2008 11:46 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Then again
Maybe it’s both
"You're thinking too much. Just have fun." -- Bennie "The Jet" Rodriguez in Sandlot
by cmathewson on May 3, 2008 11:51 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Let's face the facts here
Newspapers have consolidated. So has television news. In essence, the only real reportage in the mainstream media is news that has been sanitized to the point of being vapid, unreliable and slanted.
CMath has it right in Iraq. Sure, we’ve lost our 4K soldiers, maybe another 40K wounded. Do you think the Iraqis have lost more than we have? Um, we have all that weaponry and green kids with little sleep manning the gun turrets, who are scared shitless.
So, yes, we’ve killed a couple hundred thousand people in a country far away, whose language we don’t speak, whose culture we do not understand, and whose traditions we cannot grasp. Luckily they have a lot of oil.
Does the mainstream media ask any questions about this? 70% of Americans want to end the war in the near term. Will the mainstream media treat the Republican and Democratic candidates fairly in looking at the war?
No, we will be treated to endless stories about how Obama’s pastor is sooooo scarey, whereas McCain’s 100 year occupation of Iraq is just another routine policy position.
If you get your reality check from the MSM you are ipso facto ignorant. OTOH, if you dig, if you cross-check, if you find sites whose members are informed and active, you can get a pretty good look at what is really happening out there, not to mention a pretty thorough critical look at actual MSM reportage, on the Internet.
But, you have to think for yourself. For every good site, there are a 100 idiotic ones. Myself, I favor open-source because I trust other people, especially ones who have no stake in the outcome of the website, but just post as a service for the community.
The internet has broken down barriers to the truth. What we haven’t done is change the essential power arrangements in our society whereby the super-rich continue to have their interests protected while the rest of society pays dearly for the right just to survive.
by Old Twins Cap on May 4, 2008 12:00 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs

by 















