Nick Blackburn V Nick Blackburn
We know Blackburn will never blow anyone away. But what's the difference between one of his good starts, and one of his bad ones?
With a chance to extend the AL Central lead to a relatively wide 1.5 games last night, Nick Blackburn was once again in a position to help the Twins get comfortable in the driver's seat of the division. But, once again, he stumbled. So below I'll be using chart data from Brooks Baseball's pitchfx, who feed their data directly from MLB.com's Gameday readings, to see if there's a discernable reason for his faltering performance last night.
On August 18, Blackburn went eight strong innings against the Athletics, allowing just three runs on six hits. Last night he didn't manage to get through five innings against the Angels, and while his defense didn't do him any favors, it's quite clear that between the two starts he wasn't the same pitcher. He logged 4.2 innings, allowing six runs (three earned) on 10 hits, and he didn't strike out a single Angel batter.
For a pitcher to be effective, and for his pitches to "work", he needs to apply force to the ball. In conjunction with velocity and drag force, how a pitcher grips and releases the baseball can cause it to do beautiful things. Inducing spin and angle, the trajectory of any pitch is dependent on exactly how the pitcher handles the delivery. As you can see from the charts below, Blackburn wasn't controlling his pitches as well on Saturday night as he had six days ago against Oakland in the Dome.
Spin Angle & Magnitude
August 23:
via brooksbaseball.net
August 18:
via brooksbaseball.net
The changes here are pretty drastic, since Blackburn uses spin on his balls to induce movement; more spin equals more movement. His fastballs on August 18 were regularly spinning at 2200-2600 RPM. Last night only one fastball broke 2200, and usually spun 1800-2000 RPM. Both the slider and the changeup show the same symptom, spinning much slower against the Angels. Only the curveball was consistently picking up more RPM, sitting right around 1000. Unfortunately, while this made for a better curveball it also meant it was coming in at the roughly the same height as all of his other pitches, because relative to his appearance against the A's his fastball, changeup and slider were all pretty flat. Angel hitters rarely had to work to pick up where the ball was coming from, because they were all coming in on the same angle. For some pitchers, that works. For Blackburn, it certainly doesn't...at least, not last night.
Average Pitch Virtualization, Top View
August 23:
via brooksbaseball.net
August 18:
via brooksbaseball.net
Average Pitch Virtualization, Side View
August 23:
via brooksbaseball.net
August 18:
via brooksbaseball.net
The side virtualization is a little deceiving, because once you remove the orange line (the two cut fastballs), there isn't much difference in break. The curve stilll starts out higher before dropping off, and the fastball, slider and change have similar side-view trajectories. The real difference is in the top view, where you can really see how Blackburn used spin to create drag force on the ball to induce movement. Everything, especially the fastball and slider, moved better against Oakland on August 18.
Finally, looking at the top virtualization it would be easy to assume that Blackburn was actually a bit more wild horizontally. And the fact is, he was. On the 18th, when he threw 99 pitches (66 for strikes), 62 of the pitches hit a standardized strike zone, for a strike percentage of 62.6. On Saturday night, he threw 79 pitches (54 for strikes), and 55 of those pitches were strikes on a standardized strike zone, for 69.6%. But because every pitch looked different, and almost every pitch was breaking harder, Blackburn was able to be effective by pitching outside of the strike zone against the A's. Against the Angels he was hitting the strike zone more consistently, and with a good offense like LA has that's a dangerous game to play--especially when a guy like Blackburn didn't have his best stuff.
I'm certainly not excited by the prospect of the Angels lighting up one of our starting pitchers. But after doing this bit of research I'm a bit more optimistic because it confirms for me that Blackburn isn't a good pitcher this season just because of luck. He's a good pitcher because when he's on, he gets movement on all of his pitches. Some nights you have it, others you don't, and when Nick gets another chance to extend Minnesota's AL Central lead, hopefully he'll be able to step up to the challenge.
12 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
To Me
It Looks Like Blackburn is Regressing, Almost Tempted to say he Might be a Long Reliver at Best.
You keep saying this but I'm not sure where you're getting it.
Prior to last night, 7 of his last 10 starts had been quality starts. Last night was only his third bad start since the start of July. What makes you say he’s regressing?
I Say that Because
He Seems to Be Giving up Most of his Runs Late in the Middle to Late Parts of the game now, before the allstar break, he was giving up the bulk of his runs early in the game.
Let's make Johan Santana a middle reliever
He allows nearly more runs in the fourth inning alone than in the first three combined. And the 4-6 innings are his worst.
That’s no barometer for measuring pitching.
by Johnny Safron on Aug 24, 2008 3:14 PM EDT up reply actions
I think...
..we often forget that Blackburn is a rookie. It’s hard to do since he was here in September and we all talked about him all off-season after his great AFL starts. I don’t think he is getting worse, he has been putting up plenty of good starts. This is by far the most innings that he has thrown with AFL and the majors put together, so we’ll see how he does this last month.
by Twins Territory on Aug 24, 2008 1:47 PM EDT up reply actions
You know, I think alot more of it is just luck
than we like to admit. Sometimes pitches get hit, sometimes they don’t. This is especially true of someone who doesn’t strike a lot of guys out. Those graphs are pretty, and maybe they tell us something, but let’s do a thought experiment:
Let’s assume Buscher and Gomez make those defensive plays in the 3rd inning. If so, no runs score. It’s more than possible that he goes on to get through 7 innings giving up 2-3 runs, and Jesse never writes this article. We think to ourselves that he pitched about the same as he did against Oakland, and we go merrily along our way.
by Eric in Madison on Aug 24, 2008 12:17 PM EDT reply actions
There's always luck involved,
but having better stuff always helps. You could also say that, in this comparison, Blackburn benefitted from an inferior offense of the A’s, whereas he suffered at the hands of a better offense in Anaheim.
None of that changes the fact that he actually did pitch quite differently in the two starts, and that if he throws like he did last night more often than he throws like he did on the 18th, he’ll lose a lot more than he wins.
I do wonder, though
about his longterm effectiveness as a starter. He doesn’t strike enough guys out, and his ERA overstates his quality this year. He has 14 unearned runs, which is a huge number, some of which he’s responsible for. (By comparison, Baker, Perkins and Slowey have 3 unearned runs between them).
He absolutely deserves credit for seizing a job and doing well with it, though.
by Eric in Madison on Aug 24, 2008 12:34 PM EDT reply actions
I think Blackburn is still a good viable pitcher.
7 quality starts for a Rookie pitcher is very good. All pitchers have off nights where their stuff isn’t as good as usual. The trick is to control the damage and keep your team in position to win. That will come for Blackburn with experience. I see him becoming a Greg Maddux type pitcher. Lets just Slowery brings his A game tonight.
Heres My Question
Is Blackie Guarenteed a Rotation Spot Next Year, Oh Will guys Like Duensing, Mulvey and Humber Beat him out?
Like in most situations like this,
it’ll be Blackburn’s spot to lose. The Twins will have a lot of pitchers vying for five spots, and I don’t think Duensing will be considered. It’s such pointless speculation in August of the year before, but I think the Twins will start the year with Liriano, Baker, Blackburn, Slowey and Perkins. If anyone gets in, it’ll probably be either Humber or maybe Mulvey as a dark horse.

by 


















