What's Going On?
As I looked around the Metrodome on Sunday afternoon, seeing 40,000 fans scream as the Twins took the division lead, I couldn’t help but ask, ‘what the hell?’ We’ve spent a lot of time talking about all the things we think the Twins should or should not do to what players and who they might trade and how they can capture the division. But we’ve happily glossed over the fact that the Twins are really where they are quite inexplicably. The national media is typically surprised to see us sitting atop our division. We, after all, lost our two most recognizable stars last offseason, including the best pitcher in baseball. Wise Twins fans saw that this tea looked like one that would play just above .500. Pessimistic ones wondered if we’d beat last year’s win total of 78.
So what the hell’s happened in the meantime? We can’t help but feel very pleased with the contributions we’ve gotten from our young starters. Even still, our run prevention, hurt by a mediocre defense and a bullpen far more pedestrian than we are accustomed too, had remained unimpressive at 9th in the AL.
Our hitting is where things get weird. The Twins hitters have been perhaps a bit better than expected, but few Twins hitters are really shattering realistic expectations (Denard Span and Alexi Casilla come to my mind as the most pleasant surprises, but those guys are still humbler speedsters, not world mashers). Michael Cuddyer was supposed to remain an important right handed producer in the heart of our lineup, but he’s missed much of the year and produced poorly when healthy. Brendon Harris and Delmon Young have hit much better of late, but both started so poorly that their overall numbers are still relatively depressed. Carlos Gomez has been one of the worst hitters in the league so far this year and has more plate appearances than anyone else on the team other than Morneau. So the Twins team production numbers are good, though not great. While their team batting average is a nice 4th place in the AL, proven better indicators OBP and SLG remain middle of the road at 8th and 20th in the AL respectively. This puts our OPS at .743, respectable, but only good for 8th in the AL. Of course, there is the well publicized lack of homers with the Twin having more than no other AL team. We aren’t a successful team at stealing bases, ranking in the bottom half in bases stolen and tied for last in all of baseball with the putrid Washington Nationals for worst success percentage.
So then why is the middle of the road production of our hitters adding up to the 5th best run scoring offense in the American League, right among with all the top tier offenses like Boston, Detroit, and Chicago?
The Twins have had absurd success this year with runners in scoring position. The team OPS shoot up over .100 points above normal to a stratospheric .848. The general trend is for teams to hit better with runners in scoring position than overall (pitcher’s in jams already struggling, worse pitchers are more frequently in that situation in the first place, pitchers in the set, etc) but the Twin’s jump is far beyond reasonable deviation. The Twins are the best hitting team in all of baseball with RISP. They are hitting a ridiculous .315. They have both the highest on base and second highest slugging percentages in all of baseball in these situations. That’s right, the team with the fewest home runs in the AL magically transforms into the biggest bundle of sluggers in the entire game when runners are standing on second or third.
I don’t really believe in clutch hitting as a sustainable skill, but even the most devout lover of Derek Jeter has to admit that our team production with runners in scoring position is well beyond what even the most clutch team should be able to expect to hold. The best explanation for the majority of the disparity is plain luck, and lots of it. Lots of baseball is a lot of luck, but this is just ridiculous.
So, first the Twins are scoring more runs, a lot more runs, then they really ought to be. Then, on top of that, they’re winning more games than their run differential should even allow. The Twins have given up 514 runs this year and scored 547, good for a quality +33 difference. Their Pythagorean winning percentage has them at 59 wins. Sitting 3 games above their Pythagorean expected isn’t outside the bounds of simple chance deviation but it is once again, on the lucky side of fate. Often, you will see teams with very good records in close games which can be a big part of the disparity. Often, great bullpens or defenses are given as factors that can help win close games and push a team beyond its expected numbers, but the Twins have neither this year. Close games hasn’t been they key anyway as the Twins have a 21-17 record in 1 run games that isn’t peculiarly different from their overall record. Meanwhile, we sit ahead of the White Sox who have scored more runs than us, given up less, and have a much more impressive +75 run differential.
So the Twins are scoring more runs than the contributions of their hitters ought to lead to, and are then winning more games than those runs, even with all those strange extras, should allow, leaving us doubly lucky. I can’t profess to know why this is happening and the Twins are where they are. I wrote in the Gameday programs over a month ago about the Twins’ unusual fortune with runners in scoring position and mentioned that those successes were likely to regress, but it just hasn’t come about. The Twins have long been accustomed to beating their Pythagorean, but the elements of the team typically given credit for the achievement are absent from the team this year (although the team is not beating their expected wins so radically this year as it has in the past when it was sometimes well outside usual statistical deviation).
I can’t explain why the team is drawing 40,000 eager fans in what was to be a ‘reloading’ year. I can’t explain why losing their two best players from the previous year, then losing Pat Neshek, their most important set-up man, and Michael Cuddyer, their most important right handed bat, hasn’t killed whatever remaining chance the team had. The best I can do is thank the baseball gods that the Indians have totally collapsed and that we play in a suddenly weak-again AL Central.
I don’t have the answer to how the hell this team is pulling it off, so all there is for us to do is sit back, cheer, and enjoy the ride.
1 recs |
8
comments
Comments
Those are some good observations
I’m baffled, too, as I didn’t think there was any way whatsoever that the Twins finished at .500 this year. But the pitching has been a bit better than I forecasted, and the offensive performance with RISP has been jaw-dropping.
I don’t think these strange winning ways are sustainable. Nathan has been such a stud that you can chalk some of the deviation from our Pythagorean record up to him (even though Grady is completely oblivious as to how to leverage a bullpen), but other than that, the Twins are due for a big regression in some important areas.
If Livan hadn’t gotten such sick run support (6.32 runs per 9 IP), the Twins might be sitting 3 or 4 games out of the lead instead of in first place.
Still, the Twins could conceivably remain in the pennant race – not because of what has made the club great so far, but because of Liriano, perhaps a healthy Cuddyer, sudden improvement by Gomez… That sort of thing.
by PhoenixV on Aug 4, 2008 4:30 AM EDT 0 recs
Headscratchers and Gardy
No doubt. I did not see this coming. If the Twins win the division again this year, will some of Gardy’s harshest critics come around to the conclusion that, all-in-all, he is a damn good manager? Or will they continue to say that he gets lucky and that the AL central is weak? Because if you can’t evaluate a manager by wins and losses, especially when the team often plays better than projected, what can you evaluate on?
by wcooley on Aug 4, 2008 7:53 AM EDT 0 recs
Psychology?
I think there is a Yogism “90% of the game is half mental”.
There is also the Gestalt Theory, another Psychological construst “The WHOLE is more than the sum of the parts”.
I have pondered over the past several years WHY do the Twins go on the BIG inning, or these 12/13/14 run games, and then the next day no one can get a hit or the team cannot score a run.
I have seen posted (not sure where) that the Twins practice situational hitting during the season while most teams only practice it seriously during Spring Training. I don’t know if this is true, yet it seems to be supported by the supposed RISP anomaly.
What’s with Run Support. I have not done any research, yet there are some very good pitchers who get poor run support, and there are some poorer pitchers which get great run support. My own explanation is that if Baker/Santana is pitching, the Twins subconsciously expect that a couple/several runs are enough to win. If Livan is pitching, subconsciously the team knows they need to score some runs tonight.
When teams go on a run, the psychology seems to be positive with an expectation of winning. When a team is in a losing streak, everything seems to go wrong and there is an expectation that even if they are ahead, something will bounce wrong and they will lose. Winners expect to win, losers expect to lose. 3/4 weeks ago the Twins had a run where they seemed to go down 3 runs each game. You could almost see the light switch on, and the team thinking “We’ve got them where we want them”...AND then there would be a comeback.
Statistics can tell us what has been, we can even slice and dice these statistics to analize situational statistics, yet I am not aware of a statistic which can quantify the mental approach of ANY group to a given situation.
There is a saying “Success breeds success”, I suspect the corrilary about failure should hold as well. And maybe the Twins are just too young to KNOW that they aren’t really that good. OR, God forbid, Gardy is reasonable good at this mental stuff :-)
I don’t know, but it’s way to much fun.
Regards,
I don't suffer from insanity...I relish every moment of it!
by the Dragon on Aug 4, 2008 7:58 AM EDT 0 recs
Some thoughts on that
I disagree with a few of your points. First of all, I’m not sure the Twins’ offense is more of the “feast and famine” kind than the others teams’ offenses (this ought to be tested statistically – maybe I’ll look into it later). Sure, as spectators we always tend to remember those days where the lineup simply can’t pull it together after having killed the opposing team the night before. But we don’t pay notice to the instances where they actually perform pretty consistently.
It typically takes a lot of consecutive hits/walks to score a significant amount of runs, and since batters only get on base about 35% of the time, the laws of probability tell us that we are bound to see a lot of run scoring fluctuations.
I don’t buy into the notion that hitters take it easy when they have a good pitcher on the mound compared to when they have Livan, er I mean, a bad pitcher going. With this logic, why wouldn’t they turn their offense up a notch during the September stretch run as well? And yet practically no teams score 6.5 runs per game in September.
About the concept that things seem to fall into the right place when you’re winning and the opposite when you’re losing… Maybe we should turn that around a bit. What if the Twins are winning BECAUSE all the little things go right? Now, I do agree that good hitting is, to some extent, contagious, but we need to be careful not to overestimate the mental aspect of a hot streak.
by PhoenixV on
Aug 4, 2008 2:23 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Subconscious need to score runs for bad pitchers?
http://www.firejoemorgan.com/2006/04/i-cant-believe-what-im-watching.html
Check out Goal Line Blitz, a fun web-based American footbal MMORPG
http://goallineblitz.com/game/signup.pl?ref=2882412
by joeiscool12 on
Aug 4, 2008 2:33 PM EDT
up
0 recs
I am surprised as well
and of course, their RISP numbers are a big part of that. I seriously doubt there’s any real skill there. Still, they’re in the race, obviously, and we have to consider that.
Even if there is some regression on the RISP numbers, there is some reasonable hope that the run prevention will be better over the last couple of months.
by Eric in Madison on Aug 4, 2008 11:19 AM EDT 0 recs
Sometimes its better to be lucky than good
And while looking at numbers and formulas should give a person the ability to look into the future and forcast outcomes, life doesn’t always work that way.
Regardless of the reasons why the Twins are winning, they are in first place and I am enjoying it.
Win Twins!
by caluofmn on Aug 4, 2008 12:07 PM EDT 0 recs
Yup
my thoughts exactly.
"You can't sit on a lead and run a few plays into the line and just kill the clock. You've got to throw the ball over the damn plate and give the other man his chance. That's why baseball is the greatest game of them all."
~ Earl Weaver
"In God we trust. All others must provide evidence."
~ Billy Beane
by AdamOnFirst on
Aug 4, 2008 3:31 PM EDT
up
0 recs










