What we learned
This was always supposed to be a development year. I predicted 82 wins, so even though the offense went cold in the end, I think this year was a great success. And relative to the goal--to learn about young players and build for 2009--it was a banner year. Here are 13 guys who we should be excited about gong into the off season.
1. Denard Span: Why did the Twins score so many runs? Getting guys on base at the top of the order is why. For the first time in recent memory, the Twins have a true lead-off hitter. The only question is whether he plays in right center or left next year.
2. Alexi Casilla: The Twins' weakness both short and long term figured to be up the middle. Casilla solidifies one of the two spots. The fact that he could play on either side of the second base bag gives the FO more flexibility in completing the roster puzzle.
3. Nick Blackburn: He'll never be an ace, but he should be a reliable innings eater for years to come.
4. Scott Baker: He could be that ace in the mold of Brad Radke. He certainly erased a lot of doubts after the year he had.
5. Francisco Liriano: This was a great building year. Next year, look out.
6. Jason Kubel: It seems like a long time ago, but the blogs were a twitter about getting rid of this guy in the first half of the season. To date, his career looks a lot like a young David Ortiz. As he gets more comfortable, I would love to see him mature into some semblance of Ortiz.
7. Kevin Slowey: He vindicated a lot of supporters. Tip your cap to Seth, Slowey appears to be the real thing, someone we can count on as a middle-of-the-rotation starter.
8. Glen Perkins: He should be right there with Slowey if he can maintain his stamina a year after a huge percentage increase in innings pitched.
9. Carlos Gomez: I think we know what we have--a great defensive center fielder who is a good number 9 hitter. That's fine by me.
10. Delmon Young: He disappointed me. But he seemed to get better as the year went on. I think he grew up and I hope they decide to keep him. His best years are ahead of him for sure.
11. Jose Mijares: I think we know who Gardy wants next year. This kid is a revelation. Too bad he couldn't have come up earlier.
12. Craig Breslow: The best move of the year for Bill Smith. That's saying something.
13. Brian Buscher: He might not be an everyday player, but he's a heck of a left handed bat.
Most teams are happy to develop two or three players in one year. The Twins have developed 13 this year. That is huge. It means they can focus on filling just a few holes, knowing that they've got a strong nucleus of players who will not likely show signs of age for several years.
1 recs |
43 comments
Comments
Breslow
I hope Breslow stays on for next year. He ate up innings when asked and was a LOOGY when asked. I find that kind of valuable. I think Dennys Reyes will not be back next year.
by DedicatedFollowerOfFashion on
Sep 30, 2008 11:04 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
1. Denard Span: I can’t wait to see Span play an entire season. It’ll be interesting to see what they do with the outfield. He should be a great leadoff guy for years to come.
2. Alexi Casilla: He’s a great number two guy to go before Mauer, and with his young age provides some stability up the middle for a long time to come.
3. Nick Blackburn: He might not be an ace as you said, but how easy was it to forget the guy was a rookie this season? What a remarkable year (and finish) for Black’s first year.
4. Scott Baker: I think Baker could be part of a solid one-two punch with Franchise. He could be the Radke-Santana punch, and proved to be a big-game pitcher.
5. Francisco Liriano: This was year one from Tommy John. They say year two is when they are 100% back and sometimes even better. Watch out, this guy might just be back!
6. Jason Kubel: He still struck out more than I’d like to see, but he provided the team with some much needed power and stepped up big on several occasions. I’ll take him anyday at DH.
7. Kevin Slowey: I think Slowey reallt emerged this season, and he is a very solid three guy that can be counted on for a big game.
8. Glen Perkins: Perk fell off a little at the end, but it was expected after moving from the bullpen. I love him as a backend of the rotation guy.
9. Carlos Gomez: Go-Go will only get better, and that is scary for other teams. He should become better at stealing, and when he moved to the nine spot really excelled. He has some power too.
10. Delmon Young: People thought he was bad this year, but he really wasn’t. He hit somewhere near .300 with a good number of RBI’s and decent power. He just turned 23, and he improved big time at the plate as the months passed.
11. Jose Mijares: Awesome is all I can say. This kid is going to be a great lefty for us, and he throws hard. He showed me that he can be a guy that faces right-handers too.
12. Craig Breslow: Waiver pickup? Wow! This guy along with Mijares better be the two lefties in ’09.
13. Buscher: I don’t like him as a starting 3B, but he is a great backup. I’d like to see a big addition at third.
I’m very depressed and sad that it’s over, but that a future!
by Twins Territory on
Sep 30, 2008 11:09 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Mijares ...
I believe the Hat Tip goes to Mr CMathewson on that one!
Slowey was an easy pick, to call Mijares was quite impressive!
by SethSpeaks on
Sep 30, 2008 11:55 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Where's Punto?
What about LNP?
"I don't think it's nice, you laughin'. See, my mule don't like people laughing. He gets the crazy idea you're laughing at him. Now if you apologize, like I know you're going to, I might convince him that you really didn't mean it . . ."
by Skippy tastes better than Jiff on
Oct 1, 2008 12:03 AM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
we all hope nick punto is elsewhere next year
sure he had a bounce back year at the plate but i still cant stand him and think he will go back to the 07 punto
YOUR 2008 AL EAST DIVISION CHAMPIONS.... THE TAMPA BAY RAYS!!!
by RaysOfHope on
Oct 1, 2008 1:21 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Punto
I mostly just concentrated on the less established players in this post. Of course, the team will have Morneau and Mauer and Nathan and probably Cuddyer and Redmond. But they are the established players.
Punto is a free agent and I don’t know what they will do with him. I hope they upgrade at the everyday shortstop position, either by acquiring a good second baseman and moving Casilla over there or getting a good shortstop. If they resign Punto, I hope it is for the utility role. But he will be too expensive for that and, at this point in his career, he expects to play everyday. I think he would be a distraction to this team if they make hima a utility guy again. ANd we all know about Gardy’s love affair with him. He’ll play way too much if he’s on this team for my taste.
"You're thinking too much. Just have fun." -- Bennie "The Jet" Rodriguez in Sandlot
by cmathewson on
Oct 1, 2008 8:57 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Kubel and Gomez
Kubel needs to find a way to lay off that slider thrown at his back foot. He is such a sucker for that pitch you can see it coming a mile away.
And what to do with Gomez? It is so clear that when he is anxious he is an automatic out. The oppo team announcers just laugh.
by wcooley on
Oct 1, 2008 7:23 AM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Gomez
He still needs some time in AAA, and with Span, Cuddyer, Kubel, and Young on next year’s roster, I think that is where he should go.
by diehardtwinsfan on
Oct 1, 2008 7:54 AM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Memories
People who propose that Gomez go to AAA for more seasoning forget that he hit around .300 in the second half, once he didn’t have the pressure of the leadoff role on his shoulders.
"You're thinking too much. Just have fun." -- Bennie "The Jet" Rodriguez in Sandlot
by cmathewson on
Oct 1, 2008 8:59 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
People can also see
That in way too many at-bats he is completely lost. Of course, the whole team looked lost last nite besides Span and Cuddyer, so he is just one of the guys.
by wcooley on
Oct 1, 2008 9:10 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
"Completely"
I agree that he looked lost at times. But I saw real progress, especially in taking tough breaking pitches and not being so pull happy. So I wouldn’t say he looked “completely” lost. He’s got work to do. But I don’t think he has anything to learn at AAA because the kind of at bats where he looks lost are typically against pitchers who dominated AAA for a short time before coming to the majors for good. In short, the kinds of at bats he needs to get better at are against major league pitchers, not AAA pitchers. My sense is he would crush AAA pitching right now and would not be challenged enough for his development.
He still has a lot to learn, but he’s ahead of a lot of guys at his age in this category. Torii Hunter, for example. If nothing else, he demonstrated this year that he has a very bright future ahead of him. And I think the future is now.
"You're thinking too much. Just have fun." -- Bennie "The Jet" Rodriguez in Sandlot
by cmathewson on
Oct 1, 2008 10:21 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I like the Gomez
He hit much better out of the 9 hole with about a 100 point jump in OPS. He still wasn’t amazing but I’m more than ok with having the 9th hitter with a .328 OBP. I think having him start in CF next year and bat 9 until he can develop better is the perfect plan. When he does get on base he’s got our best hitters to knock him around the bases and hopefully he’ll refine his base stealing technique next year. He had a couple bad months stealing and it made him a bit gunshy. I wish we could see stats regarding how many times he was picked off. I’m less worried about him getting a bad jump and getting thrown out than him getting picked off and not being able to read the pitcher.
I was one to want to send him down mid summer with the emergence of Span but now with his defense out there and his great last month I’m hoping another off season of work can make him the player we saw in May and September rather than the rest of the year.
Peyton's good but have you ever heard of Jeff George?
by halfchest on
Oct 1, 2008 11:02 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
If you are right
I say send him to AAA. If you are right, and he domolishes AAA pitching (by demolish, I mean lots of line drives and XBHs, not beating out choppers and bunts), then call him back up in May. No harm, no foul. If he doesn’t demolish AAA pitching, leave him there to learn to hit line drives, and take pitches.
I agree that he looked better at the end of the year, but I still don’t understand how the twins benefit from him developing in the big leagues. If he proves that he should have been in the bigs, we lose one month out of him. If he spends most of the year, we gain a year of service time at a higher quality of play. In the meantime, it gives Pridie a chance as the 4th outfielder. Maybe he shows us something, and we can get value for him in trade.
by snolls on
Oct 2, 2008 8:15 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Well
Well, he really only hit .270/.316/.383 in the second half, as compared to .253/.287/.351 in the first half. Little difference between those two sets of numbers other than a 20 point bump in BA and the matching, flat bump across the other two numbers. The troubling background numbers didn’t improve much either. His 22% K/PA in the second half was little better than his 25% K/PA in the first half, and he only managed a small bump in his walk numbers, going from 3.5% BB/PA in the first half to 5.2 BB/PA in the second half. A little improvement there, but hardly enough to be even statistically significant, much less move him out of the abysmal range in both numbers.
He’s already a great defensive player, with the ability to be quite exceptional, he’s a spark plug on the bases, he a terrifically fun guy to have in the clubhouse and to root for, and he had some very important big games for us. But the overall production just isn’t there. I said it at the start of the year, I said it in the middle, and I’ll say it now at the end, Gomez needs more AAA seasoning.
Remember, it’s been said, but Hunter was sent down a couple times and he wasn’t shattered. He improved into the all-star his talent promised him to be.
"You can't sit on a lead and run a few plays into the line and just kill the clock. You've got to throw the ball over the damn plate and give the other man his chance. That's why baseball is the greatest game of them all."
~ Earl Weaver
"In God we trust. All others must provide evidence."
~ Billy Beane
by AdamOnFirst on
Oct 3, 2008 2:52 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
trade cuddyer
he gets hurt too much and i our offense is more built for span and gomez
YOUR 2008 AL EAST DIVISION CHAMPIONS.... THE TAMPA BAY RAYS!!!
by RaysOfHope on
Oct 1, 2008 1:17 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
No value
If you put yourself in a perspective of a potential buyer of Cuddyer. It looks more like 2006 was an anamoly than an indication of potential. He’s expensive and has injury problems. Not a whole lot of trade value there. I think we’ve got a CF/RF mishmash next season on deck.
Now trading Blackburn…There value right there.
by TMW on
Oct 1, 2008 2:48 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Span- He completely blew me away. Until June I figured the best he’d be would be trade bait or a banjo-hitting 4th OF in the mold of Jason Tyner.
Mijares- What a way to nail the audition for Reyes’s old job. Thanks for the supplemental 1st round pick next year.
Buscher- He’s basically a cheaper version of what Lamb should have been this year. The Twins have been without a decent 3rd baseman for so long, I’m perfectly happy with a Buscher/Harris platoon at 3rd.
Gomez- I don’t like the idea of AAA, his defense is too important what with Blackburn being our only ground ball pitcher. Plus his at bats got a lot better in August and September.
Young- Not quite the power I was hoping for, but like Gomez, he got a lot better as the year went on. If he can learn to take better routes to fly balls the Twins will have the best defensive OF in the game next year, and it wouldn’t be terribly close.
by JopeX37 on
Oct 1, 2008 10:28 AM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Outfield Defense
It seems the Twins don’t like to shake things up too much but it seems to reason it would make sense to move Span to Left Field and Young to right field next year. If I’m correct more balls go to left field generally and it’s bigger in the dome plus having a strong arm ala Cuddy/Young is good for right field to keep guys from going to 3rd base.
I don’t know much about defensive metrics but I’d really be curious to see how Young did defensively vs. other left fielders in the game. If anyone has that info or knows a good place to find it let me know.
Peyton's good but have you ever heard of Jeff George?
by halfchest on
Oct 1, 2008 11:05 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Left vs. right
I expect Span to move to left, just because it’s a bigger field in the Dome and he has the weakest arm of the four. I also expect the Twins to shop either Delmon or Cuddy for a third baseman who can be at least as productive at the plate. I actually would favor a Cuddy move to third, but I don’t think the Twins would ever do that. Anyway, if they trade Delmon, then Cuddy gets his right field back and Span gets left. If they trade Cuddy, I would be in favor of a flip flop of Span and Delmon.
"You're thinking too much. Just have fun." -- Bennie "The Jet" Rodriguez in Sandlot
by cmathewson on
Oct 1, 2008 1:20 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I've always got the vibe...
That Delmon doesn’t like playing in left field. Not sure why. He just plays differently out there than he did in right.
Check out Goal Line Blitz, a fun web-based American footbal MMORPG
http://goallineblitz.com/game/signup.pl?ref=2882412
by joeiscool12 on
Oct 1, 2008 2:08 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Left vs. right
I was reading Bill James and he made an interesting point about right fielders, and that is that there are relatively few “natural” right fielders. Just guys who can hit really well that don’t fit anywhere else and guys with cannons for arms. Like Cuddyer and Young. So it makes sense to shop one of them, and to put Span in left regardless of how the outfield shakes out. Personally, I’d rather they try to get rid of Cuddyer, even if it does mean getting less.
by JopeX37 on
Oct 1, 2008 3:12 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I agree with your list CM, great stuff.
I would like to see us bring in a 3B and a SS. Keep Harris and Buscher for a dynamite bench. Do we have any talent coming up in the system to fill these spots?
by Beerbear on
Oct 1, 2008 1:47 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Hughes
I hope that Hughes shows himself to be ready enough to play either 2B or 3B. Since he can play either, I think we should look for 1, very good 2B, SS or 3B, instead of two marginal players.
If we get a SS, then Casilla stays where he is, and Hughes plays 3B is he’s ready. If not, we go with Harris/Buscher until he is.
If we get a 3B, we move Casilla to SS, and Hughes plays 2B. If he isn’t ready, Tolbert fills in until he is.
If we get a 2B, we move Casilla to SS, and Hughes/Harris/Buscher play 3B.
by snolls on
Oct 2, 2008 8:22 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Defense
I’d like to see Hughes start the year at AAA to shore up his defense. He made15 errors at New Britain last year and he only played in 80 games. Also, I think his numbers from last year are a bit skewed. His BABIP in New Britain was .380 despite an average LD% of 17. In Rochester, his BABIP was .370 with a LD of 16%. That was his first good year of hitting in the minors, so it’s within the realm of possibility that he comes back to earth in 2008. I wouldn’t want that to happen in the majors. I think you need to evaluate him some more, especially considering he’s only had 117 PAs above AA ball. Also, I’ve been told they’ve given up on him as a second baseman and are grooming him to play third exclusively.
If you’re going to stick with a Buscher platoon, Harris would be a nice choice. He did his best work over at third and he’s a better hitter than Hughes or Macri.
"You're thinking too much. Just have fun." -- Bennie "The Jet" Rodriguez in Sandlot
by cmathewson on
Oct 2, 2008 9:51 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Agreed
Hughes has a bit to go. He strikes out a lot too. He may be close, but I’d definitely keep Harris around for another year.
by SethSpeaks on
Oct 2, 2008 10:08 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Only quarrels
are minor ones.
Kubel: An Ortiz in the making? C’mon, your love affair with this guy has you out of your mind CMath. Kubel is servicable at DH, no more. Ortiz flashed quite a bit more during the few moments he had when he wasn’t constantly injured for the Twins. Kubel is two years out from his “knee” problems. He has been “healthy” all season, and did a fine job. Not an outstanding job. He is no David Ortiz.
Gomez: he is so young, I think it is possible that he can develop into more than just a #9 hitter. However, if Span and Casilla can keep up their ends then I will be more than happy to see Gomez stay at 9 and we will see some truly ferocious piranhas here pretty soon.
by montanatwinsfan on
Oct 1, 2008 2:26 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
forgot to mention
hope it was evident that by my “minor” quarrels statement I was clearly stating that I agree with you and it was a good assessment overall.
by montanatwinsfan on
Oct 1, 2008 2:27 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Haha, Kubel.
Look even if he did have the talent to be an Ortiz, the Twins would never be able to develop it. The organization doesn’t focus on making those types of hitters. Had Ortiz remained he would never have been the force that he became even without being next to Manny.
by MNPundit on
Oct 1, 2008 2:39 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Ortiz vs. Kubel
"You're thinking too much. Just have fun." -- Bennie "The Jet" Rodriguez in Sandlot
by cmathewson on
Oct 1, 2008 3:12 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Ortize vs. Kubel
Oops, hit return a couple of times and the post was empty. I was going to do a Player A and Player B analysis:
Player A:
Age 26 412 AB 112 H 32 2B 20 HR 75 RBI .272 /.339/.500
Player B:
Age 26 463 AB 126 H 22 2B 5 3B 20 HR 78 RBI .272 /.335/.471
Player A was Ortiz in 2002. Player B was Kubel in 2008. Ortiz hit more doubles, but otherwise, their numbers are strikingly similar. I won’t say this means Kubel will have an Ortiz-like career. As some of you have mentioned, there are way too many bvariables to make a prediction like that (Manny, Boston, etc.). But I did say I thought he could have some semblance of an Ortiz-like career.
"You're thinking too much. Just have fun." -- Bennie "The Jet" Rodriguez in Sandlot
by cmathewson on
Oct 1, 2008 3:19 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Not as
Not as ridiculous as it maybe appears in first light. Remember, when he was coming up through the system, he was billed as maybe the best of the Morneau-Mauer-Kubel 3. He got sidetracked for several years, but the sky could be the limit for him again.
"You can't sit on a lead and run a few plays into the line and just kill the clock. You've got to throw the ball over the damn plate and give the other man his chance. That's why baseball is the greatest game of them all."
~ Earl Weaver
"In God we trust. All others must provide evidence."
~ Billy Beane
by AdamOnFirst on
Oct 3, 2008 2:43 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Who's up, who's down?
The listing above seems pretty optimistic. You don’t think any of the above will be worse next year? My vote would be for Blackburn, Breslow, and Buscher to all be significantly worse next year. I’m not sure I can name someone who I think will be a lot better. Liriano and Cuddyer I suppose.
tborg
by tborg on
Oct 1, 2008 6:04 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Predicting regression
The toughest thing to predict in baseball is who will go down. The only players who are likely to go down are over the age of 28. None of the players on the list are close to that age.
"You're thinking too much. Just have fun." -- Bennie "The Jet" Rodriguez in Sandlot
by cmathewson on
Oct 1, 2008 7:34 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Yeah, but...
Don’t you think that’s oversimplifying a bit? Certainly there is data that says players tend to peak at 28, but there is also data that shows previous performance is a good indicator of future performance. Blackburn, Breslow, and Buscher all performed better than what was expected based on their past results (as did Span). It’s not like regression never happens to players under 28. Do you really think that all of the players you listed will be as good or better next year?
tborg
by tborg on
Oct 2, 2008 11:54 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
No
Some will regress. But predicting which will regress is a bit of a crap shoot.
"You're thinking too much. Just have fun." -- Bennie "The Jet" Rodriguez in Sandlot
by cmathewson on
Oct 2, 2008 12:04 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
which means
that predicting which will improve, and which will stay flat is equally a crap shoot.
by snolls on
Oct 2, 2008 3:12 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Yes
When you have 13 or 14 guys (counting Tolbert) who are all under 28 and had breakthrough years in 2008, that’s a pretty large sample. Some will regress, some will stay steady, some will improve. But with that large sample, the odds are the group will get better as they grow and develop as major leaguers.
The trend is typically up until age 28, but there are a lot of outliers. Guys develop at different rates. Guys get hurt. Guys play over their heads for a half season and cool off. You look for these things, but they’re more often found in scouting reports than numbers.
The numbers I look for are trends. But trends can be interpreted in multiple ways. For instance, Mulvey was great in the second half despite mediocre overall numbers. Does this indicate he’s ready to take the next step? Or is he a better second half pitcher? Luke Hughes got off to a torrid start last year before cooling off quite a bit. Was the cooling off a matter of injuries, or was he just having a career half season?
Denard Span appeared to turn the corner after his eye surgery. This is a distinct event that suggest he wasn’t merely hot for an extended period but we can expect more of the same. On the other hand, as the league begins to figure some of these guys out, they’ll need to make adjustments and few of them have demonstrated that ability as of yet. Some of these guys could go the way of Lew Ford, who never made the adjustments.
Ask me specific questions about guys and I’ll give you a projection within a rather wide margin of error. But I’m not going to sit here and do what PECOTA did last year, randomly predicting regression for Morneau and Mauer despite improvements from their comps. If there’s a science behind PECOTA, their Minnesota projections cast serious doubts on their methods.
"You're thinking too much. Just have fun." -- Bennie "The Jet" Rodriguez in Sandlot
by cmathewson on
Oct 2, 2008 3:37 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Agreed
What you said is the exact point. We are an exciting team, because, on balance, most of our players can be expected to improve. I just think it is important to remember that they won’t all improve, and many of them had tremendous years, so flat would be a success.
For instance, if Span can put up an OBP above .375 again, we should be ecstatic. If All five of our pitchers can come in and be sub 4.00 ERA pitchers next year, we should go wild. I think that it is likely that our group of players will improve, but we have to expect that one or two of the positions that we currently consider a lock for next year, won’t come through as expected.
by snolls on
Oct 3, 2008 8:58 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Outfield
Span is a guy who gives the appearance that he can be a good fielder at all three OF positions. Cuddyer is okay in right (not great range, but a big accurate arm), Gomez is a fine CF, and Young…well, he should get better. The best alignment, to me, will be Span (lf), Gomez (cf), and Cuddyer (rf). I see Span starting 30-50 games at each of the outfield spots with Cuddyer also playing some first base and Kubel getting an occasional start at a corner, all of this predicated on good performances by all and no major injuries. Keeping all five OFs covers for regressions, injuries etc.
IMHO Cuddyer is a better hitter and a better fielder than Delmon Young right now. Delmon has a very good to great upside, but he is a long way from it yet. A healthy productive Cuddyer will help the Twins’ lineup more than Beltre. I’m not saying the ’06 Cuddyer, but maybe split the difference from ’06 and ’07.
by Alexi Casilla All-Star on
Oct 1, 2008 11:07 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
My gut says...
…Cuddyer is the better player at this point in his career. But he’s so injury prone, it’s hard to trade the depth we have in Delmon for what we need and hope that Cuddy stays healthy for a whole year like he did in 2006. All things considered, it’s really even: Cuddy’s a better player right now, but he’s got the big contract and he’s already hit his upside. I say offer one or the other and see which one gets the most value in return.
"You're thinking too much. Just have fun." -- Bennie "The Jet" Rodriguez in Sandlot
by cmathewson on
Oct 2, 2008 9:55 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Casilla
I don’t know why Casilla dropped off—injury, regression to the mean, fatigue—but he certainly did. He completed about 2/3 of a season as a second baseman. It wasn’t great in the end, but he was worlds better than his rookie season of ’07.
If the Twins want to contend next year (and I am sure they do) I don’t think they can afford the risk of moving Casilla to short, where he may or may not thrive and have an unknown quantity at second. Casilla was comfortable and reasonably focused at second. If he is left alone, I think he will be a fine everyday player.
by Alexi Casilla All-Star on
Oct 1, 2008 11:23 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Moving Span to left field makes a lot of sense. Although, I can’t imagine how Delmon Young would react to a ball hit off the baggie. That might be scary.
Twins are in a bit of pickle. They have two good righty OF’s and only 1 spot. Why can’t we just have 4 OF’s?
by ianmader on
Oct 8, 2008 10:08 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs











