Twinkie Town: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Jeff Sullivan's MLB Trade Deadline Primer

How Much Could Carl Pavano Get Through Arbitration?

Six million?  That's alright.  Ten million?  That's outta sight.  Right?

When the Twins offered Carl Pavano arbitration on Tuesday, it didn't exactly come as a surprise.  He was the only Minnesota free agent to receive an offer, and well, that really didn't come as a surprise either.

Pavano and his agent have made it clear that they intend to test the open market, but for a guy who A) has said he wouldn't mind a return to Minnesota, B) has said he's not really interested in finding himself on another new team, C) probably wants to play for a contender and D) would be entering a free agent market where salaries could be suppressed (hurrah collusion conspiracy theories!), does he really want to turn down the opportunity that's presented itself to him?

The burly right-hander turns 34 in early January, and is coming off of his first not just productive but healthy season since 2004 when he was still with the Marlins.  I don't want to say the end is in sight for Carl, but realistically there are way more years in baseball behind him than in front of him.

We've talked before about how FanGraphs tends to over-value a player's production in terms of dollars, and it's no different with Pavano as they estimate that on the open market his production was worth $16.5 million dollars.  Obviously there's no way his numbers would be worth that much money to replace.  But he was probably worth more than the $1.5 million base he was on the books for in 2009.

Here's Pavano and six other guys who had similar seasons across a number of different categories; some are closer than others.

Player Age Team IP FIP K/9 BB/9 K/BB HR/G WHIP FG Dollars
Carl Pavano 33 Indians/
Twins
199.1 4.00 6.64 1.76 3.77 1.17 1.37 $16.5
Nick Blackburn 27 Twins 205.1 4.37 4.29 1.79 2.39 1.09 1.37 $13.3
Mark Buehrle 30 White Sox 213.1 4.46 4.43 1.90 2.33 1.14 1.25 $15.2
James Shields 27 Rays 219.2 4.02 6.84 2.13 3.63 1.19 1.32 $18.3
Cole Hamels 25 Phillies 193.2 3.72 7.81 2.00 3.91 1.12 1.29 $16.9
Ryan Dempster 32 Cubs 200.0 3.87 7.74 2.93 2.65 0.99 1.31 $16.4
Scott Baker 27 Twins 200.0 4.08 7.29 2.16 3.38 1.26 1.19 $15.9



Blackburn was under team control last summer, but the rest of this fine cast of characters were all pitching under a contract in 2009:

Pavano:  $1.5 M
Buehrle:  $14.0 M
Shields:  $1.5 M
Hamels:  $4.35 M
Dempster:  $8 M
Baker:  $750 K

Immediately you see the problem.  All of these guys are at different stages of their careers and at different contractual stages, and it's not realistic to just take the average of the six salaries for an estimate, which is just over $5  million.  Or is it?

Here's a list of arbitration-eligible starters from last winter who were 30 or older, and what kind of a contract they received, although this won't help either because it's not free-agent arbitration:

Mike Gonzalez, 30, 1 year/$3.45 M
Brandon Backe, 30, 1 year/$1.55 M
Wandy Rodriguez, 30, 1 year/$2.6 M
Chris Capuano, 30, minor-league contract
Justin Duchscherer, 31, 1 year/$3.9 M
Todd Wellemeyer, 30, 1 year/$4.05 M

Which of course means Pavano is, more than likely, due more money than Wellemeyer received last year in his final year of arbitration.  But how much?

A 34-year old Braden Looper made $4.75 million in 2009 after signing a contract with the Brewers.  Coming out of his age-31 season Dempster signed a pretty substantial four-year deal with the Cubs.  Randy Wolf (32) made a shade under $5 million this season, and Pavano's former rotation-mate Brady Penny (31 last season) made about the same.  Jamie Moyer (older than baseball itself) made $6.5 million.

Those are the kind of guys Pavano can be grouped with:  veterans who can provide innings and still be effective without breaking the bank and/or being the staff ace.  So maybe $5 million doesn't actually sound so bad for an arbitration offer after all.

If that's all arbitration could garner Pavano, maybe he really might be better taking his chances on the market if he is concerned about the dollars.

Conclusions

With uncharacteristically low contracts offered last season, there has been a lot of talk that teams in baseball would rather non-tender certain arbitration-eligible players and forego the remaining year(s) of team control than pay what has suddenly become a price higher than market value.  It's a financial luxury teams are choosing not to take advantage of.  If this is indeed the case, some veterans who aren't sure of what the market will provide may be tempted to accept that arbitration offer.

Additionally, Pavano's recent history is blemished with injuries and an entire lost season, and that leads me to believe that the chances of his payday in arbitration being closer to $10 million than to $5 million aren't very high.  But realistically, after the season he had in '09, I have little doubt that he could find a team willing to offer a two or three-year deal worth that $5 million...per year.  If not more (I have some doubts about a continued suppression of spending in free agency this year).  So in spite of the possibly lowered expectations on the free agent market and a guaranteed payday via the arbitration route, Carl will probably have the option of multiple years.  Personally, that's not something I want to see the Twins take on.

It was a good move by Minnesota to make Pavano the offer, and oddly enough it puts them in a no-lose situation.  If he accepts they'll get him for one year at what is likely to be a price that the team can easily absorb, and if not then the Twins receive a compensatory draft pick next June and the freedom to go after somebody else with that allocated cash.  As long as this doesn't somehow turn into a multi-year, mega-millions fiasco, this is a good situation.

0 recs  |  Comment 10 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

5 million

5 million is probably the starting point, I’d say, with him likely being able to command 6 or 6.5 for a single year deal. I’d be fine with the Twins taking the risk and giving him 10 million for 2 years, but no more money than that and not for a third year. Ideally, they could talk him down to 5 million guaranteed the first year with a team option for the second with a larger buyout (something like 1 or 2 million) and a vesting clause that makes the option automatic above 160 IP or 28 starts or something like that.

Bottom line, Pavano will probably take the contract offered to him that is worth the most money for the length of it, regardless of the $$/year ratio, as this could very likely be his last chance to cash in with a larger free-agent deal. I believe the Twins will have a very strong opportunity to make a deal with Pavano, though I do think the market would force the Twins to give up a little more than Twins fans might be hoping, but not unpalatably so. I’m hopeful…

"You can't sit on a lead and run a few plays into the line and just kill the clock. You've got to throw the ball over the damn plate and give the other man his chance. That's why baseball is the greatest game of them all."
~ Earl Weaver
"In God we trust. All others must provide evidence."
~ Billy Beane

by AdamOnFirst on Dec 4, 2009 12:09 AM EST reply actions  

If I'm Pavano

I would look to maximize my 2010 value, even if it means a one year deal. If he pushes for 2-3 years, he’s likely going to end up with an AAV somewhere in the $5M range. Sure, $10-15M is nothing to sneeze at, but a smart one year deal with incentives could push him up near $10M next year alone, with similar potential the following year.

Unless someone is out there looking to give him 3 years and $25-30M, if I were Pavano I look to get everything out of 2010 that I can.

by Adam Peterson on Dec 4, 2009 11:19 AM EST up reply actions  

I don't

I’m not sure if they’re willing to take the risk on next year that you have them taking. I have a similar idea though, with him getting as much as he can out of his 2010 CONTRACT, instead of just the 2010 year.

"You can't sit on a lead and run a few plays into the line and just kill the clock. You've got to throw the ball over the damn plate and give the other man his chance. That's why baseball is the greatest game of them all."
~ Earl Weaver
"In God we trust. All others must provide evidence."
~ Billy Beane

by AdamOnFirst on Dec 4, 2009 1:41 PM EST up reply actions  

I wouldn't be surprised if Pavano accepts arbitration.

I’m not expecting him to, mind, but it wouldn’t be shocking.

I’ll be blatantly honest — I want him back because of all the brushback pitches he threw in Game 3. The man pitches with Yankee-hate in his eyes. It’s hot.

http://www.realityfish.com

by Robin G on Dec 4, 2009 9:42 AM EST via mobile reply actions  

I liked that too.

Pavano is a bit of a different breed than previous vet starters, which is why I’m not opposed to bringing him back.

by Jesse on Dec 4, 2009 10:21 AM EST up reply actions  

+1

He pitched with attitude last postseason. We need someone who wants to go out there and kick the Yankees’ ass. You have to figure in the next few years, if we make the postseason, there’s about a 50-50 chance we’ll play the Yankees because the wild card will probably come out of the AL East, preventing us from playing the AL West champ (first round cannot be intra-division).

If we want to advance during Mauer’s prime years, we need some Yankee killers.

by Adam Peterson on Dec 4, 2009 11:23 AM EST up reply actions  

Arbitration offer

First we have to come with our arbitration number. If we come in too low (say $3-4M), then there’s a good chance Pavano ends up making nearly $10M next year. All that is argued is the midpoint between offers. Pavano doesn’t have to argue he’s worth $9M, we don’t have to argue he’s worth $3M. Pavano simply argues he is worth $6M +$1. Frankly, I think he wins that argument and suddenly we’re on the hook for $9M.

I would start with an offer of $5M. It will be more difficult IMO for Pavano to argue he’s worth $7-8M. Assuming he accepts arbitration, of course.

by Adam Peterson on Dec 4, 2009 11:14 AM EST reply actions  

I'm no math genius,

but I don’t understand how 9 is the midoint between 3 and 6.

by montanatwinsfan on Dec 4, 2009 2:18 PM EST up reply actions  

In this scenario

Pavano’s number is 9, Twins is 3. The arbitrator can only pick one number or the other. Of course, if both sides think the midpoint is reasonable (which in this hypothetical scenario it probably is), they often come to agreement beforehand.

Sorry about the confusion.

by Adam Peterson on Dec 4, 2009 4:32 PM EST up reply actions  

nice post Jesse,

I think your reasoning makes a lot of sense.

by montanatwinsfan on Dec 4, 2009 2:22 PM EST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

TT is an SB Nation blog of, by and for the fans. We strive to be the best Minnesota Twins blog by providing quality content and analysis, as well as daily news and notes on the team. We hope you'll make Twinkie Town your home for all things Twins!
Start posting about the Twins »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

Connect_with_facebook

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Mr. Grit overlooked
The_jet_small
Free Danny Valencia
Small
Minor League Report...July 24, 2010
Small
The Twins have the best starters in the AL.
Small
Minor League Report...July 17, 2010

Recent FanPosts

Small
Good News/Bad News: Twins trade Ramos for Capps.
Small
Chicago TV announcers...
Twins_small
Matt Capps
Bc_small
Clutch hitting, fact or illusion?
Minnesota_twins_vinyl_baseball_small
Words from the great beyond? And haves and the have nots…
Small
Trade Help: How Much Are My Guys Worth?
Small
Poll: Your favorite non-Twins team.
Small
What team do you hate the most?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Twinkie Town On Twitter

SPONSORS

SBNation.com Recent Stories

HOUSTON - JULY 24:  Pitcher Roy Oswalt #44 of the Houston Astros throws against the Cincinnati Reds in the first inning at Minute Maid Park on July 24 2010 in Houston Texas.  (Photo by Bob Levey/Getty Images) +13 updates

Done Deal: Roy Oswalt Traded To Phillies, Will Make Debut Friday Night In Washington

Washington Nationals' third base coach Pat Listach shakes Adam Dunn's hand who rounds third after hitting a solo home run during the eighth inning of a baseball game against the Atlanta Braves, Thursday, July 29, 2010, in Washington. (AP Photo/Drew Angerer)

MLB Trade Deadline: Where Does Your Team Stand As Saturday Approaches?

Philadelphia Phillies' Cody Ransom, left, celebrates with Greg Dobbs (19) and Placido Polanco after Ransom scored on a single hit by Wilson Valdez against the  Arizona Diamondbacks to win the baseball game in the 11th inning Thursday, July 29, 2010, in Philadelphia. The Phillies won 3-2. (AP Photo/H. Rumph Jr)

Phillies Complete Sweep Of D'Backs With 11th-Inning Win

More from SBNation.com >


Editor-In-Chief

Twinkietown_small Jesse

Senior Writer

Small Bobomojo

Hrbek_small Jon Marthaler

The_jet_small cmathewson

Gladdentwins_small Adam Peterson

Hosken_powell_autograph_small RandBall's Stu

Special Contributor

Untitled_small Trevour

Twins-release_small Nick Nelson

Small Karlee Kanz

Moderators

Chairmanmauer_small fischean