Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Jeremy Lin And How The Pac-12 Missed Him

Some small sample size observations

34 at bats, 12 innings pitched.... these aren't samples worth taking away too much relevant information.  This is especially true if you are looking at batting averages ERAs or any stats like that.  There are a few things that I noticed when looking at our stats thus far that I found interesting.  Whether any of this is meaningful or not remains to be seen.

Delmon and Carlos

Our two swing first, think later youngsters are both off to hot starts. 

  AB Hits 2b 3b HR BB OBP Slg Avg.
Delmon Young 34 13 3 0 2 0 0.417 0.647 0.382
Carlos Gomez 33 9 2 1 3 4 0.351 0.667 0.273

The thing that sticks out right away is the power.  Neither of these two showed a ton of power last year, and 5 and 6 extra base hits in 34 and 33 at bats is a very encouraging sign. 

There is one other thing that sticks out, and that is the walks.  Delmon hasn't taken a walk yet in 34 at bats.  With all of his changes he's made to his approach, it doesn't look like patience was one of them.  Carlos, on the other hand, has taken 4 walks in 33 at bats.  For comparison, he took 25 walks in 577 at bats last year.  If he kept at his spring training rate for 577 at bats, he'd have 70 walks.  Now, a sample of 33 at bats doesn't equal a complete change in approach, but it does show that he has taken his criticisms to heart and is working on these things in spring training.

Scott Baker has given up 8 homeruns in 12 innings.

What does this mean?  Probably not too much.  Small sample size and bad luck combined with the fact that he's a flyball pitcher are probably to blame.  His 9 ks and 2 walks are more important to me.  It sure is astounding to see on a stat sheet though. 

The pitcher I'd be concerned about, and the one I was concerned about coming in, is Glen Perkins.  He has a nice 3.00 ERA, but has only struck out 6 batters, and walked 4, in 15 innings.  Not good.  Kevin Slowey has 10 ks and 1 BB in 9 innings.  Encouraging, but really not a huge suprise.  Liriano also has a nice 14/6 k/bb ratio, and he also has a nice 2.36 GB/FB ratio.  To put this number in context, it was 2.19 in his dominating 2006 campaign, and last year it was 0.92. 

Gomez showing power and patience is very encouraging.  Liriano regaining his groundball tendencies could make him a dominant force once again.  Perkins continuing to not strike people out could catch up with him this year.  At this point, these stats don't have much predicative power, but it will be interesting to watch them as the spring continues. 

Comment 15 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Small sample size

While I really appreciate the optimism, the small sample size really makes most of these stats useless for predicting anything. Is Span really going to hit as poorly as he has thus far this spring (one game notwithstanding)? Or Crede?

What I do think is useful are the ‘scouting’ observations of the players—Gomez looks like he’s taking more pitches and not swinging as much. Young looks like he’s trying to drive the ball more and get better pitches to hit. Baker has looked like he’s been hitting most of his spots, and it’s only his mistakes that are getting bombed (perhaps at an unsustainable rate I might add). Liriano looks like he’s dealing again, whereas Perkins again is reminding us all of Livan Hernandez last year—a guy who wins some games in spite of his pitching and not because of it.

What is most exciting to me are the continued development of Baker, Liriano, and Slowey, the willingness of Gomez and Young to try something different at the plate, Span’s continued feistiness and chip on his shoulder about proving he belongs, Blackburn looking like he’s not going to regress from last year, and Crain (as well as some other relievers like Breslow) looking good again. I think this year’s Twins looks like they could be highly entertaining as well as successful.

by biggity2bit on Mar 19, 2009 11:18 AM EDT reply actions  

might want to check your equations

I think something may be off with your OBP calculation…9 hits, 4 walks, and 37 PAs does not a .667 OBP make.

formerly known in these parts as adamb

by ravenfly on Mar 19, 2009 12:19 PM EDT reply actions  

True

Using the above stated numbers:
Young’s OBP is .382 (which oddly matches his stated slugging percentage…. hmmmm…..)
Gomez’ OBP is .394 (doesn’t match his slugging percentage, but 9 hits/33 AB does equal .273….)

I think some of the categories and numbers got switched around.

by biggity2bit on Mar 19, 2009 12:39 PM EDT up reply actions  

oh ya

I do dig those OB numbers though. If they can come within +/- .010 of those during the regular season, I think we will all be very happy.

by biggity2bit on Mar 19, 2009 12:41 PM EDT up reply actions  

I will be very happy with anything over .350

as an OBP for either Gomez or Young. Especially Gomez. With Young, I can live with the lack of patience, but his slugging needs to improve.

by Adam Peterson on Mar 19, 2009 1:30 PM EDT up reply actions  

Statistics and spring training don't mix

Randy Ruiz hit two home runs in 27 spring ABs last year, fooling many Twins’ fans. Young had a great ’08 spring with 18 total bases, which was one batter than Craig Monroe, who also had a nice spring. As did Mike Lamb.

Those are just some examples of how little spring training stats matter.

Most fans did not applaud Young’s ‘08 regular season, they despised Monroe and Lamb, and despite assertions from some that the Twins would have won the division had they jettisoned Livan Hernandez sooner, I’ll argue that Minnesota would have won the division if they had kept Monroe and left Ruiz in AAA so he could move on to a miserable ’09 spring with Toronto.

This year, Denard Span has had a poor March, but he hit his one home run off Papelbon. Assuming Papelbon wasn’t just working on something, that home run MIGHT have meaning. More meaning than any of the home runs by Cuddyer, Kubel, Young or Gomez.

Gomez has homered off 31-year-old big-league novice Dan Geise and off Hayden Penn, he of the 9.3 career big-league ERA. Gomez also took deep Danny Bautista, who has had an ERA under 5 about as often as leap year comes knocking.

Young went deep of Joe Nelson, who has been with five big-league teams in five sporadic visits to the majors.
And he hit one off Zach Duke, which like Span’s home run COULD be a reason to be hopeful assuming Duke wasn’t throwing his third straight change-up to Young.

I haven’t followed this team much the past week, but the early showing seems to reflect few runs based on the numbers of hits the team has produced, and a lack of power. Having said that, I’ll return to the notion that none of it means very much. But at least you gain insight into the statistic if you dig deeper and examine WHO a player did something against.

Bloggin' the bloggers since 1938.

by Johnny Safron on Mar 19, 2009 3:34 PM EDT reply actions  

Yeah

Spring stats mean almost nothing. And they mean less with the WBC. When you don’t have your regular three and four hitter for most of the games, you will struggle to score runs.

"You're thinking too much. Just have fun." -- Bennie "The Jet" Rodriguez in Sandlot

by cmathewson on Mar 19, 2009 9:51 PM EDT reply actions  

Despite the WBC...

…which strikes me as a marketing creation of Bud Selig and some of his assorted dorks, it was interesting to read a stat in the Wall St. Journal that after the last WBC, big-leaguers who played in the WBC and the regular season spent less time on the disabled list than those who didn’t play in the WBC.

It was the Journal’s stat of the day, seemingly intent on quieting those who are concerned about someone blowing out a spleen during this stupid tourney. And it worked for me, not that I was terribly concerned about it anyway. I’m sure more guys have ended up on the DL after drinking too much at day-off mid-season home barbecues, ultimately putting a kaboob skewer through their hands, than will ever get hurt in the WBC.

The WBC does have some interesting uniforms, however. Maybe MBL can just sell WBC merchandise and forget about the actual play.

Bloggin' the bloggers since 1938.

by Johnny Safron on Mar 19, 2009 11:55 PM EDT up reply actions  

I feel like everyone really misunderstood what I was doing with this post.

And, since it wasn’t just one person, obviously its because I wasn’t very clear. I don’t do a lot of writing, and obviously didn’t get out there what I meant to. I was merely pointing out some interesting stats from the spring thus far, as a way of watching them as the season goes on. I wasn’t trying to draw conclusions based on these facts. I never said that I think Carlos Gomez is a changed hitter and will walk 100 times this year. I never said that Delmon is going to hit 25 homeruns this year, or that Glen Perkins is going to be awful. As I said at the end of the post, "At this point, these stats don’t have much predicative power, but it will be interesting to watch them as the spring continues. "

by lookatthosetwins on Mar 19, 2009 10:50 PM EDT reply actions  

True

I agree with you last sentence completely, as I think all of commenters. I think the broader point we’re all making is to the larger audience and not you specifically.

by biggity2bit on Mar 20, 2009 10:19 AM EDT up reply actions  

That makes sense

It’s just like me to take everything so defensively. I guess when it’s written instead of spoken its hard to tell.

by lookatthosetwins on Mar 21, 2009 4:54 PM EDT up reply actions  

My understanding is that

Young has adjusted his batting stance , lowring it so he can get a little under the ball to push it into the air more, instead of beating it into the ground like he did last year. fi he can raise his air to ground ball ratio then he should hit for more HR this year.

My question is has any one seen him hit? how much has his batting stance really changed? And could that account for some of his spring production?

Will the Real Thor Please Stand Up ... ?

by the Real Thor on Mar 20, 2009 11:15 AM EDT reply actions  

I can't speak to his stance first hand

but Delmon also had a very good spring last year. He’ll get his chances to show the power during the season. I’ll be watching the GB/FB ratio closely, as he went from 46-33 in 2007 to 55-28 last year with a 4% drop in LD% on top of it.

by Adam Peterson on Mar 21, 2009 9:54 PM EDT up reply actions  

Delmon

To me the most encouraging news is that Delmon is trying to change anything at all.

If some of these changes were actually based on suggestions from his coaches now and then, I might really get excited.

by by jiminy on Mar 25, 2009 9:54 AM EDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

TT is an SB Nation blog of, by and for the fans. We strive to be the best Minnesota Twins blog by providing quality content and analysis, as well as daily news and notes on the team. We hope you'll make Twinkie Town your home for all things Twins!

Twinkie Town On Twitter


Editor-In-Chief

Twinkietown_small Jesse

Senior Writer

Small Bobomojo

Hrbek_small Jon Marthaler

The_jet_small cmathewson

Gladdentwins_small Adam Peterson

Hosken_powell_autograph_small RandBall's Stu

Twins_woo_small Steve Adams

W00t__2__small brandonwarne52

Special Contributor

Small roger13

Untitled_small Trevour

Chairmanmauer_small fischean