Let's Get On the Same Page: There Is No "MLB The Show" Cover Curse
I promise.
We all know about the Madden Curse. Garrison Hearst was fine in 1999. Barry Sanders retired, which is less of a curse and more of a "I'd like to still be able to walk when I'm 50" kind of a thing. Then things went a little crazy....
Eddie George: Failed to break 1000 yards
Daunte Culpepper: Missed four games, not the same MVP type of QB
Marshall Faulk: Healthy, but under-performed
Michael Vick: Broken leg
Ray Lewis: Played for the Ravens
Donovan McNabb: Out after week 9
Shaun Alexander: Missed six games
Vince Young: 9 TDs, 17 INTs
Brett Favre: Played for the Jets
Troy Polamalu: Played in just five games...but Larry Fitzgerald escaped unscathed
It's a dubious honor to be sure. And it's become such a recognizeable part of sports Americana that I can't blame anyone for seeing Joe Mauer on the cover of MLB '10 The Show and getting a little nervous. But you know what? Forget about your worries and your strife. Hakuna matata.
Since Sony's baseball game moved from 989 to The Show before the 2006 season, all four of the game's cover athletes have done just fine. I present to you a simple chart, showing games played and OPS for both seasons in question--the season that inspired the cover, and the season represented by the cover.
|
Player |
Game |
Prior Season |
Game Season |
|
The Show '06 |
159 games, 1.001 OPS |
151 games, 1.049 OPS |
|
|
The Show '07 |
154 games, .912 OPS |
160 games, .963 OPS |
|
|
The Show '08 |
144 games, .976 OPS |
162 games, .881 OPS |
|
|
The Show '09 |
157 games, .869 OPS |
154 games, .819 OPS |
Doesn't that make you feel better? None of these guys missed significant time, and none of them completely bombed out the year they graced the game's cover.
Once upon a time, Kirby Puckett was on the front of a baseball game...no curse for Kirby, either.
[NOTE: NES cartrage image via analoghero.com]
0 recs |
17 comments
|
Comments
Standing O!
I would like to give you props Jesse! This catapults you into the status of LEGEND! The fact that you took a picture of a Nintendo game featuring one of the all time greats shows real creativty and style! I am impressed!
by Bert: Oh, we're live? on Feb 4, 2010 10:20 AM EST reply actions
Totally
Although I admit I bought it just cuz Puck was on it. :-)
I was an RBI Baseball guy myself.
The Twins were awesome in that one.
Baseball Stars
I loved baseball stars! Amercian Dreams (I think that is what they were called), Ruth, Aaron, Mays, etc, etc….. I loved how you could rob homers!!!! And create guys/teams and power up your players with each win!
by Bert: Oh, we're live? on Feb 4, 2010 11:26 AM EST up reply actions
Yes
RBI was the first baseball video game I ever played, so I have a soft spot for it. It was also the first game, as far as I know, to have an MLBPA license in order to use real players. Baseball Stars was a better game (I especially loved powering up my own team), but the MLBPA license and the fact that I had a friend who owned RBI ensured that I played RBI more.
Major League Baseball was one of the few NES baseball games I never played – I played Baseball Stars, Roger Clemens, Bo Jackson, Bases Loaded 1 & 3, RBI 1-3, even Base Wars and Little League Baseball (which was awesome – it used the same game engine as Baseball Stars), but never MLB. Did it have real players, or was it just the MLB license without the MLBPA one (like Griffey on the SNES, where they changed everyone’s names)?
"There are only two things that are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former." - Albert Einstein
I'm pretty sure there were no names, only basic stats and the player's number.
It was very simplistic. But it was great.
Was
baseball wars the one where the outfielders could jump really high to rob the homer?
by Bert: Oh, we're live? on Feb 4, 2010 11:59 AM EST reply actions
That screen layout
looks just like Baseball Stars.
by Bert: Oh, we're live? on Feb 4, 2010 1:16 PM EST up reply actions
Yep, pretty much
Basically every NES baseball game used the same perspective for the batter/pitcher view (RBI was the first one I played, but I doubt it pioneered that view). The primary exception was the Bases Loaded series, which showed things from the pitcher’s perspective and showed vertical as well as horizontal pitch movement (RBI’s only vertical movement was an unhittable “drop ball” thrown by pressing up on the controller – many games had some version of that, too). RBI and Baseball Stars also used the same controls, so if you knew how to play one, you could pick up the other fairly quickly.
For the jumping really high question, my guess is that maybe you’re thinking of Baseball Simulator 1.000, which I can’t believe I forgot to list in my other post – it had “Ultra Plays”, which allowed players to make special types of hits, pitches, and defensive plays, including a super-high jump. I don’t recall whether there was anything like that in Base Wars, but it’s been many a year since I’ve played that one. It was a futuristic baseball game played by robots, and when there was a tag play, the batter and fielder would fight to the death to determine the out. I always found that guys with light sabers worked really well.
"There are only two things that are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former." - Albert Einstein
Madden Curse is legit
Not worried about Mauer at all but the Madden Curse has the best track record of any curse ever.
aside
from the Billy Goat curse at Wrigley.
"Don't take life for granted, because tomorrow isn't promised to any of us." - Kirby Puckett
Twins, Hudson Close???
MLB.com’s Bill Ladson tweets this afternoon that a “source told me that a deal is almost done between 2B Orlando Hudson and the #Twins.”
Hudson has alo been connected to the Cleveland Indians, Seattle Mariners and Washington Nationals after playing the past two season in the National League West.
We checked in with ESPN The Magazine’s Buster Olney, who wrote today on how well Hudson and the Twins may or may not fit each other’s needs and styles.
Buster Olney
Hudson, Twins, ideal for each other?
“As Orlando Hudson makes his choice between the Twins, Indians and Nationals, you wonder what goes into this kind of decision. For example: If Hudson signs with the Twins, he would seemingly have a shot to hit in front of Joe Mauer and Justin Morneau— and you’d think this would mean he would see more fastballs, given that pitchers will not want to mess around and risk walking him. This raises two questions: First, do the No. 2 hitters in the Twins’ lineup — the guys who hit in front of Mauer — actually see more fastballs than most No. 2 hitters?. The Twins’ No. 2 hitters last year saw fastballs 68.7 percent of the time, which was fifth-most in the majors. Does Hudson do well against fastballs? In 2009, Hudson hit .321 against fastballs, compared to the MLB average of .290, and had an .856 OPS, better than a league average of .839.”
HUDSON DONE DEAL I THINK!!!
RUMOR IS ITS ALL BUT A DONE DEAL!!! WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

by 























