Previewing Your 2010 Minnesota Twins: Joe Mauer
For a further explanation of that pretty graphic, I suggest you read this. (Feel free to check out the new DiamondView for pitchers as well.) Thanks, as always, to Justin Bopp for putting this together.
Clearly, CHONE excpents Joe Mauer to get on base more often than any other catcher in baseball. CHONE also expects Joe to be pretty close to the best defensive catcher in baseball, closely trailing Gerald Laird (and Kenji Johjima, although he's now in Japan). And of course, even if Joe's power drops off from last season, he's still likely to be one of the biggest sluggers from his position.
Questions about guys like Mauer are different than the questions for 99% of ballplayers. It's: "How good will Joe Mauer be this season?" instead of "Will Joe Mauer be good this season?" Still, after the jump we'll look at his strengths, weaknesses (are there any?), expectations and his role on the 2010 club.
Strengths
We all know that Mauer is one of the most complete hitters in the game today. One of the biggest reasons for this: he destroys fastballs. Not even in the sense that "Oh, yeah, he's good", because that doesn't quite cover it. Joe was 42.2 runs above average against fastballs in 2010. That's monstrous. That's I'd-better-just-make-up-another-pitch-because-there's-a-better-chance-he-doesn't-murder-it good.
What makes this such an advantage for Joe? Why do pitchers even consider throwing him fastballs at all, much less 63% of the time?
- Joe has an amazing eye, works the count and is pretty good at not swinging when the ball isn't over the plate.
- Pitchers don't really want to put another runner on base for Justin Morneau, so late in counts they choose to "challege" Mauer with a pitch they feel they can control.
- Joe's also pretty good against crappy breaking balls and mediocre offspeed pitches.
That's just off the top of my head.
Mauer's reflexes and natural skill show in how he hits the ball. He's averaged a 22% line drive rate throughout his career, and in fact only 27.5% of his balls in play have been flies. When you combine a lack of fly balls (fewer easy outs), barely any pop-ups (just 2.4% in his career) and a low strikeout rate (11.5% career), the man doesn't give you an easy out. He's always hitting the ball hard.
Of course, hitting the ball hard didn't always translate into power. At least, not until 2009. Less than three of every ten balls that Mauer hit last season were in the air, but of those three, one of every five left the park. Mauer's HR/FB ratio was a ridiculous 20.4% in 2009, thanks in no small part to all of the opposite field home runs. Now, those opposite field bombs are likely an aberration, but this much is true: Joe's picked up some power. One out of every three fly balls he pulled left the park.
Just like Hudson, Mauer's a guy who can handle any situation. In fact, he's better in medium-leverage situations (.420 OBP, .492 SLG, career) than in low-leverage ones (.394/.488), although again it's differentiating between great and stellar. In high-leverage situations Mauer loses some power (slugging just .415, although it's been much higher the last two seasons) but he makes up for it by prolonging the game: his OBP is a situational-best .429.
Defensively it's always tough to quantify a catcher. There are a number of metrics in use, and the one Justin has chosen for DiamondView is CHONE's DEF, which pretty accurately places Mauer in the upper echelon of defensively-apt receivers. He cleary understands these pitchers and has worked with most of them for years, which is always a bonus. He's got a strong and accurate arm, and he's quick with his release--not always nailing the highest percentage of would-be base stealers, but it's hard to pin that all on him.
Weaknesses
When talking about Mauer, it's more about areas where he's not as strong as compared to weak, but we'll give it a try.
More than 75% of Mauer's balls-in-play that are pulled end up being ground balls, and only about 7% are fly balls. This means that, in spite of the fact that one in three fly balls to right field end up over the fence, not many fly balls are really hit to right field. It's really a precipitous dropoff in slugging on balls in play as you move from left field (.693 SLG, career) to center (.532) to right (.398). Sure, he pulled five home runs last season (when he'd never pulled more than three in a season), but that's still only five of 28. Mauer hit 16 homers to left field in 2009, and that doesn't strike me as a repeatable skill.
What else...what else...um...Joe sometimes has trouble with sinkers? As in, he's basically league average?
Expectations
| Oracle |
AB |
Hits |
2B |
3B |
HR |
R |
RBI |
BB |
SO |
SB |
CS |
AVG |
OBP |
SLG |
| Bill James |
542 |
181 |
35 |
3 |
22 |
104 |
100 |
81 |
61 |
4 |
2 |
.334 |
.422 |
.531 |
| CHONE |
527 |
175 |
34 |
3 |
18 |
88 |
91 |
66 |
61 |
3 |
2 |
.332 |
.408 |
.510 |
| Marcel |
486 |
160 |
28 |
3 |
16 |
83 |
79 |
71 |
61 |
5 |
1 |
.329 |
.412 |
.498 |
| ZiPS |
497 |
167 |
31 |
3 |
19 |
84 |
84 |
73 |
55 |
4 |
1 |
.336 |
.418 |
.525 |
As expected, everyone predicts Joe to just be Joe. The power slips a little bit, but everybody pretty much thinks Mauer will continue to be one of the unstoppable forces in the game this season and to be worth about 7 wins above replacement.
What's His Role?
To be a leader. To be an offensive catalyst. To continue to be the center of not just the Minnesota Twins, but of the state itself and of the fanbase. It's a tough role to play. But if anyone can be all those things, Joe (he of the calmest of calm demeanors and he of the do-I-have-a-heartbeat-ilk) can be.
Our only job is to appreciate just how great he is, and how lucky we are to have a guy like this on our team. He's the epitome of Minnesota.
28 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I don't get what you're saying
about Mauer’s power to left not being a repeatable skill. If he’s going to slug 500 and hit about 20 homers this year (which is about what the various systems project), I’d expect his power to continue to be focused to left, with a similar proportion of his homers going that way. If he hits closer to 30 homers again, I’d expect about the same distribution. I think hitting with power the opposite way is very much a part of Mauer’s repeatable skill set (just ask pitchers who put fastballs on the outside part of the plate).
We'll find out.
But I think a lot of it was luck. That’s a ridiculous percentage of the whole to be put the other way, especially considering how many of those homers were line drives as opposed to actual fly balls.
I think Joe’s power is legit, but I think he’ll probably have to start pulling a few more over the fence. And if Joe does hit 20 homers this year, that ratio is going to be a lot closer to 6-8-6 than it is 12-6-4.
Projection algorithms always predict regression
Mauer only hit 9 HR in 2008 and every system is going to have those numbers in the mix somewhere.
Power surges are never projected to be repeated until they actually are repeated. That’s why when you buy a book like Baseball Prospectus, the running commentary below the projections will sometimes disagree.
Plus, MVP seasons almost always are regressed as well. Only when you are an Albert Pujols type and repeat the same MVP season several times in a row will a projection system actually peg you to keep that same level. Otherwise they end up being extremely conservative.
I expect regression.
Repeating what he did last year will be pretty difficult, even with an extra month to do it all in.
I agree that you'd expect his overall performance to regress,
but I don’t see how his hitting for opposite field power is luck. Maybe you mean the amount of homers was luck, and that could be to some extent. But unless he’s pitched very differently, which may be I suppose, I’d expect his spray chart to stay similar. No typical lefty power hitter lucks into the sort of spray chart Mauer had last year—you’re right, it would be ridiculous for a typical lefty. But it’s a result of an approach and a skill set to take the ball the other way.
Yes, that's what I meant.
Spray chart, yes, that should stay the same. The ratio of opposite field HR’s should not.
Just looking at Mauer's home runs last year
you can see that most of them barely got over the fence. Just about all of the home runs to left were in the first 5 rows in the stands. If 5 of those bounce off the wall and turn into doubles, then he should still hit 20-25 home runs this year.
And I think he will still hit 20-25 HR this season.
But I greatly doubt that the location of his homers will be the same as they were last season.
I agree about the location
In fact I’ll go out on a limb and say he hits no homeruns in the Metrodome this year.
"I couldn't do that. Could you do that? Why can they do it? Who are those guys?"
In all seriousness,
I think it’s impossible to predict where his homeruns will go because Mauer is just too damn good of a hitter. I remember someone asking him where his new opposite field power came from and Joe talked about how pitchers were trying to pitch him away last year and this is how he adapted to it, long line drive homeruns the other way. And like David pointed out below, no one knows how the new park will play, but as soon as Joe figures it out he’ll make the adjustment to his approach. If it blows in from right he’ll take advantage of the shorter left field. If it blows out to right… Thome, Kubel, the Canadian, and Joe could put up some big numbers. Or flying squirrels will jump out of the trees in center gab the ball in mid air and taking them back to their nest to feed to their young. It’s nature.
"I couldn't do that. Could you do that? Why can they do it? Who are those guys?"
Target Field is the big X-factor
I know we all know the dimensions and have done comparisons with the dome based on that, but stadiums are like concert halls — you can never predict how its going to play until it opens.
Gamesmanship
There’s been a lot written about Mauer’s tendencies and strengths this off season and it seems pretty clear to me that we may see a markedly different approach when it comes to pitching Mauer this year than he experienced last year. It seems he has to be prepared to handle the pull aspect of his game a bit better because it will be tested. And I’ve read a wide range of things that include TGT field playing to the hitters to it being a Safeco Mid-West… I’m expecting due to lower temps and small foul territory, it to play close to nuetral. It’s going to be a real joy to see how this plays out.
That being said, I’m already concered with how much I’m going to have to listen to Bert bitch about foul territory.
Diamond view
Ok – I’ve read the description at least 3 times, and still don’t understand it (the problem is clearly me).
1. Am I right in understanding that the closeness of the corner (the point in whichever cell) to the outside of the diamond is the key metric? A closer point to the edge indicates better?
2. Am I right that the number is a percentile expectation relative to the other players at the position? i.e, if a player is expected to be #2 in the league at that position, and there are 30 starters, then they would get a 97?
3. What is the shadow for? (the slightly shaded shape)
The shadow
is the average of the other catchers in the league I believe.
"Don't take life for granted, because tomorrow isn't promised to any of us." - Kirby Puckett
Yes
So the number is actually relative to all other players (including those at other positions).
For #1. Yes. the closeness to the edge is just a representation of the number at that corner. 100 is on the edge. 97 is really close. 39 is less than halfway there.
Its interesting to see what they do with catcher defense. Being able to play catcher at all takes quite a bit of skill (can’t put Thome there) but its very hard to quantify how much a catcher actually contributes from the defense.
Shaded area
If the shaded area is the average, then I’m confused. Since this is all relative to position, wouldn’t the average always be 50?
Answers.
1 – Yes. You have this right.
2 – The number is not a percentile, but rather a representation of that player’s skill set among players of the same position. This covers starters, backups, and many other players who could receive Major League playing time. I don’t have the exact number for how many catchers are included, but I can safely say the number is much higher than 30.
3 – The shaded shape is the positional average.
Two things
1. Power to left is the most repeatable skill for a left-handed hitter. Pulling homers is not as repeatable. Why? Pitchers tend to work away and only come in to keep hitters honest. Being able to hit homers off of pitches away is more repeatable.
2. Base running is undervalued. If you look at Adam P.‘s rating, Mauer rates very highly in taking the extra base. In fact, he’s one of the best players in baseball at this skill. So perhaps the metric overvalues steals and undervalues taking the extra base.
"You're thinking too much. Just have fun." -- Bennie "The Jet" Rodriguez in Sandlot
Well, OK, but Adam's metrics are better, so there
"You're thinking too much. Just have fun." -- Bennie "The Jet" Rodriguez in Sandlot
For example of #1
Ryan Howard has maintained absurd power to left throughout his career. His ISO to left is an absurd .701.
by ckb on Apr 1, 2010 4:28 PM EDT up reply actions
Wait a second...
are we really worried about what the weather factors (wind, etc.) will do to Joe Mauer’s power?
This is Joe Mauer we’re talking about. He CONTROLS the weather!

by 





























