Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Bracketology 2012: Duke Finally Steps Up To The No. 1 Line

COUNTERPOINT: Why Jesse Is Wrong and The Twins Are Doomed

(Please note: I am completely fine with the move, for many of the reasons Jesse states.  Others are less enthused.)

Aaron Gleeman:

No one would ever suggest that trading Ramos for a reliever who's slightly better than Rauch is a sound idea, yet by focusing on the save statistic the Twins have done just that and many fans will instinctively be on board with the move for an "established closer." Now, don't get me wrong: Capps is a quality reliever and represents a clear upgrade to the Twins' bullpen. What he's not is an elite reliever or enough of an upgrade to part with Ramos.

John Bonnes:

Capps, by the way, has a WHIP of 1.33, which means he’s about the same as Rauch, and not one of the top relievers on this staff.

You can use more advanced metrics, and you find the same thing. I talked a few months back about how valuable Joe Nathan was by introducing Adjusted Runs Prevented (http://twinsgeek.blogspot.com/2009/10/theres-stat-for-that-adjusted-runs.html). Those stats will tell you the same thing – and it’s something you already know: Matt Capps is a slightly above average reliever who happens to have fallen into a "closer" role.

Seth Stohs:

We know that the Twins and Mariners did have a deal in the works for Cliff Lee that centered around Ramos. Some teams seem to think highly of Ramos. So, it makes it hard to believe that a future good defense/good offense catcher is only worth one of the worst closers in baseball. We are not talking about Joakim Soria here. Again, this is not a knock on Capps as much as just being incredibly surprised or disappointed that the Twins used their top trade chip and didn’t get more.

Chris Mottram:

...Matt Capps makes the Twins a better team this year, and that’s basically the bottom line. Which is true. But if Minnesota doesn’t win this year, and Ramos goes on to be the above-average starting catcher he’s projected to become, this deal could look awfully bad for the Twins long-term.

Parker Hageman:

In exchange for Ramos and his high-ceiling, the Twins fortified their bullpen with another version of Jon Rauch.
Admittedly, Capps has much better raw stuff than Rauch. His fastball has three-to-four more miles per hour behind it and can actually miss bats. Whereas Rauch’s heater gets a below average 12% miss rate, Capps’s cheddar gets hitters to miss 20% of the time. Even with that arsenal, he’s still has posted similar results.

Josh Johnson:

Ramos' offensive potential, defensive prowess and position made him a valuable trading chip; one that Twins fans were really banking on to bring back a hefty return. Before the season, Twins fans moaned and groaned over the thought of the Twins trading Ramos to San Diego for Heath Bell. That's not to take away from Bell's or even Capps' ability, it's just that trading a top prospect for a reliever is a half-baked idea.

If we're talking about Joakim Soria, Jonathan Papelbon, Jonathan Broxton or Andrew Bailey, sure. But we're not. We're talking about a guy that posted a 5.80 ERA and was then cut by the second-to-worst-place-team Pittsburgh Pirates last winter. And the same guy who is will command a hefty price in arbitration this off-season.

Patrick Reusse:

In a way, I'm with the howling portion of the public on this one. The trade of Ramos doesn't bother me as an inspection of Capps' track record.

He gives up a lot of hits. He strikes out a few more batters than Rauch, but not as many as you would like to see from a closer. He throws 80 percent fastballs and, even at 94 mph, that results in too-frequent home runs.

Perhaps the most damning criticism of the move was made last night on MLB Network, when Mitch Williams said he liked the trade.  That's a tough one to get past.

As always, your opinions are welcome in the comments section.

Comment 104 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Mostly Hating This Trade.............

…… because I believe in the Twins development system and think Ramos would have eventually tapped into his potential. On the other hand, if he can’t learn to take a walk or hit a breaking ball, then he’s just a more power version of Butera. That is how I have to justify it in my mind so I don’t go crazy. Also, if they were going to trade for a closer, Bell would have been much better at the beginning of the season. And what’s the deal with the Twins throwing in Testa, shouldn’t have been the other way around.

by fishhead711 on Jul 30, 2010 10:27 AM EDT reply actions  

"Ramos' offensive potential, defensive prowess and position"

Beginning of the year, yes. Has he really proven that he has offensive potential and defensive prowess this year? His OBP is less that .300 and the AAA pitching staff is horrible. Defensive prowess is more than just throwing guys out. Not saying he is the reason for all the lousy pitchers Rochester has, but I just think people were so high on him early this year and he has done nothing this year to back up those expectations. Maybe this does not work out, but based on his season, I think the bloom has come off the rose to other MLB teams. Not our bloggers I guess. I may be wrong and he turns out to be a great catcher. Based on this year, I do not see that happening.

Projections are just that – projections.

 The only problem with this trade is we should have flipped him earlier this year when teams were really gung-ho for him and could have gotten more. I just refuse to believe that Seattle was really close to trading us Lee for Ramos and change. He has not performed well enough to be the centerpiece for a trade for a major talent this year.

Run baby run!

by darren004 on Jul 30, 2010 10:32 AM EDT reply actions  

so what you are saying

is that one “bad” season is the end of a minor league prospect? Alright, lets toss Aaron Hicks, Kyle Gibson (he hasn’t been doing so hot since his promotion to AA), Trevor Plouffe, Carlos Guttierez, Morales (both C & OF), and Benson.

See what I can do based simply on prospects having a “bad” season? I can gut our entire minor league system of all talent. Hell, lets trade away Aaron Hicks for Gary Matthews Jr. – this trade and Ramos/Capps have two things in common: Twins trade away major talent for below average – average production to a position they do not really need to fortify, and both Capps and Matthews have been DFA’d – Capps last year, Matthews this year.

"Don't take life for granted, because tomorrow isn't promised to any of us." - Kirby Puckett

by BCTwins on Jul 30, 2010 11:02 AM EDT up reply actions  

Where did I say that Capps was a below average reliever.

I never said that and you jumped to a conclusion.

"Don't take life for granted, because tomorrow isn't promised to any of us." - Kirby Puckett

by BCTwins on Jul 30, 2010 11:14 AM EDT up reply actions  

Not exactly...

But you did say this:

this trade and Ramos/Capps have two things in common: Twins trade away major talent for below average – average production to a position they do not really need to fortify

Which says that you think he’s, at best, average.

"There are only two things that are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former." - Albert Einstein

by BeefMaster on Jul 30, 2010 11:15 AM EDT up reply actions  

When you said
Twins trade away major talent for below average – average production

by twinspab on Jul 30, 2010 11:22 AM EDT up reply actions  

read the next two words Socrates!!

"Don't take life for granted, because tomorrow isn't promised to any of us." - Kirby Puckett

by BCTwins on Jul 30, 2010 11:23 AM EDT up reply actions  

take a look at my analogy before spouting why dont you!

"Don't take life for granted, because tomorrow isn't promised to any of us." - Kirby Puckett

by BCTwins on Jul 30, 2010 11:27 AM EDT up reply actions  

so you used trading for a below average talent

as analogy for trading for someone you don’t think is a below average talent?

I’m not sure you understand what an analogy is…

by twinspab on Jul 30, 2010 11:37 AM EDT up reply actions  

Well...

Technically, Capps was non-tendered, not designated for assignment. The Pirates didn’t release him; they just declined to offer him a contract, at least partially because he was due a big raise in arbitration.

"There are only two things that are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former." - Albert Einstein

by BeefMaster on Jul 30, 2010 11:13 AM EDT up reply actions  

No catchers in AAA

Promoted Morales and traded Ramos.

by DJL44 on Jul 30, 2010 10:49 PM EDT up reply actions  

Gardy Jr. must be starting

"You're thinking too much. Just have fun." -- Bennie "The Jet" Rodriguez in Sandlot

by cmathewson on Jul 30, 2010 11:55 PM EDT up reply actions  

I think

the reason why most are down on this trade is we may have been able to get more with him, such as an oswalt or a lee. I honestly don’t believe oswalt would have come to the american league, and I don’t believe the mariners thought very highly of wilson. While we probably could have gotten significantly more trading him last offseason, his value may be falling drastically with his dissapointing season. And really, we need a closer for this year, and a setup man for next year with crain, guerrier not signed

by the_truth92 on Jul 30, 2010 10:33 AM EDT reply actions  

watched CAPPS last 5 outings

for people like me who dont watch a lot of NATS games, matt capps last five outings:

5 IP, walk to o-cabrera, double to laynce nix. strikeouts of ricky weeks, joey votto, brian mccann, one or two more so’s but only the 1 hit.

lots of swings and misses, even with a 3-run lead and throwing nothing but fastballs. i was sort of surprised. his fastball reached up to 97 in a save against atlanta at home, and his changeup, at about 88-89 mph, get ground balls and a few swings and misses. unremarkable slider, but overall, pretty good i have to say judging from last 5 innings of work

by yefrem on Jul 30, 2010 10:35 AM EDT reply actions  

I think Capps will benefit from being on the Twins

He’s been on terrible teams his whole career. Perhaps being on a contender will help him. It can be hard to go about your business the way you know you should when you are always in the basement. I believe that Rick Anderson, Joe Mauer and Drew Butera will help him pitch a better game and make him much more effective than his statistics.

They say that he has much better pitches than Rauch, but has gotten similar results. Let’s see if that stays true when they’re both in the same system. I certainly will feel better with Capps closing than with Rauch. And I feel better having Rauch set up for Capps than Mijares or Guerrier at this point.

Did we overpay? Possibly, but we can’t know what the true market is for Ramos right now (nor can we know how Ramos will pan out). Based on the rumored trades of late, it wasn’t as strong as we’d like to think. At any rate, laws of supply and demand dictate that acquiring a midseason acquisition will likely be overpriced so it’s not surprising if we did a little. But at least we gave up an expendable player.

Bottom line, the Twins have been great at finding closers. So if they’ve been trying to get Capps for a couple years, I’m going to trust their judgment on this one and wish Ramos a good life.

Hopefully we get to see Capps tonight and find out first hand what he can do.

by Cobra312004 on Jul 30, 2010 6:27 PM EDT up reply actions  

what?

if they’ve been wanting him so bad for a couple years, why didn’t they sign him in the off-season when he was FREE — then they’d have him AND Butera.

by by jiminy on Aug 1, 2010 2:35 PM EDT up reply actions  

Capps is a good guy...

I think we need to wait a little bit before truly jumping to conclusions about what this trade means for the Twins this season as well as next season but what I do like about the trade, even though I think we may have overpaid, is that Matt Capps is a good clubhouse guy. This is from the Washington Post and has more of a National’s perspective on Capps:
--
“They appreciated the work that I had done,” Capps said. “More than anything, they kind of appreciated the clubhouse stuff, the way I went about my business. To see the person is what’s most important in my life. Hopefully, me the person left more of an impression than me the baseball player.”

Capps, 26, had prepared for the possibility of a trade, saying he understood how the business of baseball operates. Still, “it kind of caught me off guard,” he said. “I had heard a few things. I hadn’t heard a lot about the Twins. I know it’s a good organization, the year they’re having has been great.”

As Capps drove to Nationals Park, he had “different emotions.” He felt excitement about joining a team in contention for the postseason. He also felt melancholy about leaving the Nationals. He expressed his gratitude in the Nationals believing he could be a closer after the Pirates non-tendered him following the worst major league season of his career, the same offseason in which his father passed away.

“I’m kind of saddened I’m not going to be around the guys I’ve been around the last four months or so,” Capps said. “I’ve really enjoyed my time here in Washington. I knew it was a possibility. I’m saddened I’m leaving the guys I’m leaving.”
--
I think he can form some great relationships in the Twins organization and perhaps playing in meaningful September games for the first time in his career, coupled with Target Field (lower home run / fb ratio?) we can get some great innings out of him.

We’ll see, give it time guys.

by PRegiment on Jul 30, 2010 10:37 AM EDT reply actions  

Another weakness in these quotes

They assume Capps is a rent-a-player. He is under team control through 2011. Not coincidentally, Rauch, Guerrier and Crain are all free agents after 2010.

"You're thinking too much. Just have fun." -- Bennie "The Jet" Rodriguez in Sandlot

by cmathewson on Jul 30, 2010 11:21 AM EDT up reply actions  

and Ramos is under team control for 6 more years.

"Don't take life for granted, because tomorrow isn't promised to any of us." - Kirby Puckett

by BCTwins on Jul 30, 2010 11:24 AM EDT up reply actions  

Why do we need him again?

He’s been trade bait since spring training. He was going to be traded before next spring. The only question is, for what? The answer, apparently, is for the best reliever on the market. You may think it’s too much to pay.

It’s common practice in the industry to overpay in times of great need. See, Viola, Frank, Pierzinski, AJ, and Knowlauch, Chuck. If you want to fill needs you have to give up talent. You can’t expect to win every deal.

"You're thinking too much. Just have fun." -- Bennie "The Jet" Rodriguez in Sandlot

by cmathewson on Jul 30, 2010 11:58 AM EDT up reply actions  

cmath

best reliever on the market? Were not the Twins in discussion for Scott Downs? I would take Downs over Capps 10 out of 10 times.

"Don't take life for granted, because tomorrow isn't promised to any of us." - Kirby Puckett

by BCTwins on Jul 30, 2010 12:00 PM EDT up reply actions  

Downs is not available, at least not at this price.

Toronto is asking for a lot in the hopes that someone will bite. Rumor has it, the Twins offered Ramos and a prospect for Downs and Toronto turned them down. That’s when the Twins started working with Washington.

"You're thinking too much. Just have fun." -- Bennie "The Jet" Rodriguez in Sandlot

by cmathewson on Jul 30, 2010 12:25 PM EDT up reply actions  

The real test is whether Souhan likes the trade

Souhan in Chinese! : "一會兒,德爾蒙楊想與他無關的隊友。不想讓他們打他。難道不希望他們偷了他的頭盔。不希望他們成為他的Facebook的朋友。"

by what_would_gil_thorp_do on Jul 30, 2010 10:44 AM EDT reply actions   3 recs

Doh! I should have waited to hear him before I made up my mind!

(If we end up agreeing, I might have to reevaluate my entire life!)

by Luke in MN on Jul 30, 2010 11:09 AM EDT up reply actions  

when is he scheduled to come down the mountain

to tell us what to think?

I await thee o great souhan!

by caluofmn on Jul 30, 2010 11:41 AM EDT up reply actions  

He will hate it

Because it doesn’t help our starting rotation, which he seems to think is the worst in baseball.

by Cobra312004 on Jul 30, 2010 6:04 PM EDT up reply actions  

Some additional quotes from

Jack Moore at Fangraphs:

“Capps likely becomes the best reliever on the team, and should enter the closer’s role immediately. Capps won’t be a huge upgrade over Rauch, but due to the effects of bullpen chaining, the addition of Capps helps the entire bullpen.”

“It does seem pretty disappointing, however, that Capps is the return for Ramos after he was rumored to be half of a trade for Cliff Lee. Ramos, 22, is struggling at AAA but had a very solid 21 year old season in AA, hitting .330/.352/.447.”

“This one’s pretty simple for the Twins. They upgrade the front end of their bullpen, but at the expense of a promising talent at catcher. Just as far as the short term goes, the Twins obviously come out ahead, as Capps is a solid reliever and immediately becomes the best on the team. He’s not a great reliever, though, and the effect probably won’t be as high as his low ERA would suggest. I just wonder if the return for Ramos could have been more.”

My life's goal: to force fischean itno using her moderator powers

by montanatwinsfan on Jul 30, 2010 10:49 AM EDT reply actions  

Yeah.
I just wonder if the return for Ramos could have been more.

I wonder this, too.

"All I want to do is beat the hair mannequin [Anthony LaPanta] this year"-Souhan

by fischean on Jul 30, 2010 10:58 AM EDT up reply actions  

Ramos was not worth half of Cliff Lee

If he was, we would have Cliff Lee.

Ramos is over-rated people!

Rauch is not a closer!

This is a good move!!

The beard abides.

by Jason Kubel's Beard on Jul 30, 2010 1:03 PM EDT up reply actions  

It was half of Cliff Lee

for half of a year.

My life's goal: to force fischean itno using her moderator powers

by montanatwinsfan on Jul 30, 2010 2:11 PM EDT up reply actions  

The rumors had it for less than half of Cliff Lee

Ramos and Hicks was the Twins final offer. It wasn’t enough. The Rangers sent Smoak for half of Cliff Lee for half a year. The Twins don’t even have a prospect as highly rated as Smoak.

"You're thinking too much. Just have fun." -- Bennie "The Jet" Rodriguez in Sandlot

by cmathewson on Jul 30, 2010 2:17 PM EDT up reply actions  

I never suggested that he was worth half of Cliff Lee, for however long he would have been here.

I am suggesting, however, that we probably could have gotten more than an average-slightly above average reliever for Ramos.

"All I want to do is beat the hair mannequin [Anthony LaPanta] this year"-Souhan

by fischean on Jul 30, 2010 3:55 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yes, but not at this time

I have to believe they shopped around and found that this was the best deal they could make before the deadline.

Who knows? Maybe they saw something that told them his value isn’t going up anytime soon and they should get what they can now. One things for sure, his prospect status has slipped considerably since his brief stint int he majors.

"You're thinking too much. Just have fun." -- Bennie "The Jet" Rodriguez in Sandlot

by cmathewson on Jul 30, 2010 4:01 PM EDT up reply actions  

I can see both sides

Pros: This will help the team win this year. And it will make the bullpen better next year, especially with three impending free agents out there.

Cons: Ramos could become a star. At minimum, he will be a sold major league catcher. One would think the Twins could get more in exchange for him.

Most of these quotes amount to this argument: Ramos was worth half of Cliff Lee; Capps is not close to half of Cliff Lee. Ergo, the Twins overpaid. The first premise is patently false. Ramos and another top prospect is what the Twins offered. They didn’t win that deal, not even close. Ramos is not worth anywhere near Smoak in value.

"You're thinking too much. Just have fun." -- Bennie "The Jet" Rodriguez in Sandlot

by cmathewson on Jul 30, 2010 11:09 AM EDT reply actions  

Well...
And it will make the bullpen better next year, especially with three impending free agents out there.

Any thoughts on how much Guerrier and Crain will cost next year? Capps is probably looking at $5-6M next year, and it wouldn’t shock me if that was enough for both of those guys. Capps is better than Crain and Guerrier, I think, but if depth is an issue, that could matter.

"There are only two things that are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former." - Albert Einstein

by BeefMaster on Jul 30, 2010 11:19 AM EDT up reply actions  

I don't know, but $3 million a piece seems the minimum

That’s what they’re making this year.

"You're thinking too much. Just have fun." -- Bennie "The Jet" Rodriguez in Sandlot

by cmathewson on Jul 30, 2010 11:22 AM EDT up reply actions  

If Guerrier's going to be type A, you definitely offer him arbitration

And if it were me, you’d hope he doesn’t accept. If he did (and my guess is he would), he’d be getting a nice little raise on top of this year.

by Luke in MN on Jul 30, 2010 11:24 AM EDT up reply actions  

But do you still do it?

With Capps around, I don’t know if the Twins can afford to offer Guerrier arbitration – if he accepts, that’s about $10 million that you’re spending on a pair of non-elite relievers (both Capps and Guerrier are making over $3M this year). With Nathan added in, that’s a truckload of money to be spending on a bullpen, no matter how good it is.

"There are only two things that are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former." - Albert Einstein

by BeefMaster on Jul 30, 2010 12:26 PM EDT up reply actions  

egads

Our bullpen has gotten expensive. Some of these pieces are going to have to go. We’ve got guys in the minors who can step in.

by dctwin on Jul 30, 2010 1:12 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yes, at least two of the five pricey guys will need to be replaced by cheap guys

"You're thinking too much. Just have fun." -- Bennie "The Jet" Rodriguez in Sandlot

by cmathewson on Jul 30, 2010 1:42 PM EDT up reply actions  

If it were me, I'd offer Guerrier arb. and nontender Capps if I didn't have the money to sign both.

If Guerrier declines, fine, go make a deal for another 5-6 million dollar reliever (or don’t, I’d be fine with cheaper options). But you have to make a play for the draft picks, don’t you?

by Luke in MN on Jul 30, 2010 2:11 PM EDT up reply actions  

Good point

I forgot about the fact that Capps is still in his pre-free-agency arbitration years, so he doesn’t even quality for Type A/B status (not that he would anyway, after last year). He probably would after next year, assuming he doesn’t fall off a cliff.

"There are only two things that are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former." - Albert Einstein

by BeefMaster on Jul 30, 2010 2:29 PM EDT up reply actions  

Make a play for the draft picks

The player ends up on a 1 year contract for what should be close to market value. Worst case scenario, eat a little salary and dump the contract on a team that wants them. The Braves got a C prospect for Soriano from the Rays without eating any salary.

by Jon Kammerer on Jul 30, 2010 3:07 PM EDT up reply actions  

Pat Neshek anyone?

Is anyone else wondering when he is going to get another chance at the MLB level? Personally, I feel like he could have been just as much if not more of a boost to our team than Capps. Oh, and we wouldn’t have had to give up our best catching prospect to get him, seeing as he is already on the roster.

My opinion is that if the Twins weren’t comfortable with Rauch as the closer, then fill the position from within the organization. Give Guerrier a shot there, or Crain, or Neshek, or Slama. We have guys that could fill that role, and potentially quite well. I don’t think there was really any need to go trade your best trade chip for a guy who only helps your bullpen marginally at best.

Not a fan of this trade, but I sure hope I am proven wrong about it.

by Twins4Life on Jul 30, 2010 11:14 AM EDT reply actions  

When he starts pitching better

He has not pitched well since returning from surgery. It’s possible he never will. He needs to pitch well to rejoin the team.

"You're thinking too much. Just have fun." -- Bennie "The Jet" Rodriguez in Sandlot

by cmathewson on Jul 30, 2010 11:19 AM EDT up reply actions  

don't buy this

he was pitching better than manship and we called up manship. i think they’re teaching neshek a lesson.

Maroon and Gold Headquarters: The Daily Gopher

by PJS on Jul 30, 2010 5:57 PM EDT up reply actions  

Manship was here for innings

Pat can pitch an inning at a time. Manship can pitch multiple innings, which saves the rest of the bullpen.

Also, their numbers are pretty close in AAA, while Manship’s big league numbers this year are much better than Neshek’s.

"You're thinking too much. Just have fun." -- Bennie "The Jet" Rodriguez in Sandlot

by cmathewson on Jul 30, 2010 6:11 PM EDT up reply actions  

I am going to sit back and laugh

when this trade really turns out bad. Ramos could have gotten us so much more but the Twins decided to trade him away. Now, Mauer is hurting – how do we know that he won’t have to go on the DL at this point or some point during the year – its baseball.

So, we trade away our Catching prospect, who is under team control for 6 more years, for a reliever, who has a 3.5M contract, a sure raise, and one more year of team control.

"Don't take life for granted, because tomorrow isn't promised to any of us." - Kirby Puckett

by BCTwins on Jul 30, 2010 11:26 AM EDT reply actions  

I am not a fan of the trade right now either.

But we still have Butera and Morales as back up catchers. It’s not like we depleted our stash of catchers by getting rid of Ramos.

"All I want to do is beat the hair mannequin [Anthony LaPanta] this year"-Souhan

by fischean on Jul 30, 2010 12:25 PM EDT up reply actions  

I just don't really agree with this assessment.

If Ramos could have gotten us so much more, we wouldn’t be having this discussion and Cliff Lee would be starting against his former team this weekend.

Did we sell low? Perhaps. But the Twins are in a win now mentality, and you have to at least give them credit for doing something to strengthen the team. You can’t doubt that Capps will stretch out our bullpen to be even better than it is. Don’t look at it as Capps replacing Rauch; look at as Capps replacing the lower rung of our bulllpen ladder (Blackburn, Mahay…).

Obviously this looks a little better from the Nats perspective in the long run, but in the context of this season, the Twins clearly upgraded.

by Corkatron on Jul 30, 2010 1:10 PM EDT up reply actions  

but our bullpen

has not been the problem. Getting to the bullpen in the 7th inning, without already burning relievers, is our problem. The Mariners just got a better deal for Lee, otherwise I think Lee would be starting for the Twins.

"Don't take life for granted, because tomorrow isn't promised to any of us." - Kirby Puckett

by BCTwins on Jul 30, 2010 1:24 PM EDT up reply actions  

Lately our bullpen has been the problem

Four of our last 10 losses have been by the bullpen. Rauch has been real shaky lately. Guerrier is looking more like the Matty of the second half of 2008. Burnett pitched himself off the team and was replaced by Slama, who hasn’t been any better. By the numbers this year, the bullpen has been good. But the trend is down, and it is bound to continue to get worse unless we do something. Let’s call it an emerging weakness. We certainly don’t want a repeat of 2008, when the bullpen was the reason we didn’t make the playoffs.

"You're thinking too much. Just have fun." -- Bennie "The Jet" Rodriguez in Sandlot

by cmathewson on Jul 30, 2010 1:48 PM EDT up reply actions  

It may be possible that Mr. Smith knows more about baseball than we do?

Remember last year when we all wanted the front office to get rid of Delmon Young? The Twins don’t ever seem to get taken advantage of in the long run. I put my full faith in the guys in the front office. They are smarter than me. If they thought this was a good deal… great. Rausch made me pretty nervous and his fastball couldn’t break glass. Also, on a side note, Capps is a pretty damn cool baseball name and I know how you guys get all excited about nicknames around here. Should be fun. Go Twins.

I want to have Buddy Nix's baby.

by taskersd on Jul 30, 2010 1:23 PM EDT up reply actions  

EVERY POST ABOUT HIM HAS TO BE WRITTEN LIKE THIS

"There are only two things that are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former." - Albert Einstein

by BeefMaster on Jul 30, 2010 2:30 PM EDT up reply actions  

CAPPS LOCK

hopefully we will be able to say we got this game on CAPP’S LOCK every 9th inning.

by NYCisTwinsTerritory on Jul 30, 2010 3:54 PM EDT up reply actions  

This is a definite upside to this trade...

"All I want to do is beat the hair mannequin [Anthony LaPanta] this year"-Souhan

by fischean on Jul 30, 2010 3:56 PM EDT up reply actions  

I am going to sit back and laugh

When Capps saves Game 7 of the World Series!

Could happen.

"You're thinking too much. Just have fun." -- Bennie "The Jet" Rodriguez in Sandlot

by cmathewson on Jul 30, 2010 6:13 PM EDT up reply actions  

Selling low may have been the only option.

I know people are angry that we got so little back for Ramos, and honestly, I’m one of them to an extent. I also think that we may have been overvaluing him based on what he did prior to 2010.

Yes, Ramos was a more attractive trade chip last offseason. His value has decreased over the last 4 months, but there is no guarantee that this downturn isn’t going to continue. Ramos turns 23 in 2 weeks. The older he gets without being MLB-ready, the less the Twins were going to be able to get for him.

Let’s set aside what we think about Capps for a moment… It was a foregone conclusion that Ramos was going to be traded, so the question is whether or not this was a good time to pull the trigger.

Do you blame the Twins for not dealing Ramos last offseason before he had this sub-year season? I don’t see a problem with wanting to develop him 1 more year into a MLB-ready catcher to try and increase his value. A 23 year old MLB catcher is worth more than a 22 year old minor leaguer.

Then, do you think the Twins should have kept Ramos and dealt him this upcoming offseason? His 2010 season is basically set in stone as a disappointment at this point. He is currently losing value, not gaining it.

The final option would have been to hold onto Ramos for next season and hope that he rebounds. -But we have no way to know how is 2011 is going to go at this point. If he succeeds and forces a call-up, then now was a bad time to sell. If he continues to struggle at AAA in 2011 then this was a good time to sell. -But, if he has an adequate 2011 in AAA, then this was also a good time to sell.

-Flip

by Flip27 on Jul 30, 2010 11:34 AM EDT reply actions  

Meanwhile, R.A. Dickey reacts to the trade

Souhan in Chinese! : "一會兒,德爾蒙楊想與他無關的隊友。不想讓他們打他。難道不希望他們偷了他的頭盔。不希望他們成為他的Facebook的朋友。"

by what_would_gil_thorp_do on Jul 30, 2010 11:55 AM EDT reply actions  

I think you guys need to go into wait-and-see mode

Capps was an all-star relief pitcher playing for the Washington Nationals. He figured out how to get people out when pitching in front of a bad defense. Now move him to the Twins, who have one of the best defensive infields in the majors (yep, he’s a ground ball pitcher). I think this could work.
My other point is, Rauch is not looking so competent any more. I don’t know what happened, but he came out of the all-star break looking like he was in over his head.

by Dave T on Jul 30, 2010 12:14 PM EDT reply actions  

+100

Rauch wasn’t going to get it done in the 2nd half. I love the guy but have just lost confidence in him. Capps should work out, especially with Rauch back where he belong – 8th inning setup man.

The beard abides.

by Jason Kubel's Beard on Jul 30, 2010 1:06 PM EDT up reply actions  

Capps was an All-Star

only because Washington needed a presence and he had a bunch of saves.

"Don't take life for granted, because tomorrow isn't promised to any of us." - Kirby Puckett

by BCTwins on Jul 30, 2010 1:25 PM EDT up reply actions  

Default All-Star

If a team doesn’t really have any worthy all-stars, you can usually assume that they’ll pick the closer because he has a lot of saves. I’m drawing a blank on his name, but a guy from the Pirates made it a few years ago with an ERA over six, thanks to being their closer.

"There are only two things that are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former." - Albert Einstein

by BeefMaster on Jul 30, 2010 2:31 PM EDT up reply actions  

Ryan Zimmerman

He is All-Star worthy. Its not like their is no talent on the team. I am not saying Capps is an elite closer, but deserved his All-Star appearance more than Mike Williams did for the Pirates and many others in the past.

by NYCisTwinsTerritory on Jul 30, 2010 3:59 PM EDT up reply actions  

More thoughts on the trade:

1. The guy that Capps actually replaces in the bullpen isn’t the bottom 25 innings or Rauch, he replaces Duensing. Slama replaced Burnett, and Capps replaces Blackburn who replaced Duensing. Duensing was awesome this year and Capps will be hardpressed to match what BD did in the pen.

2. The bottom 25 inning replacement meme isn’t really a good one because most of those 25 innings are garbage innings that anyone can pitch.

3. This trade shouldn’t move everyone down a notch. Capps is the closer and Matty still should pitch the 8th innings. Rauch should move into the 6th and 7th inning roles. This does give us depth though as Rauch can pitch 8th’s on days Matty can’t go.

4. The perfect recent game that is an example where this trade helps the Twins is Duensing’s first start this year. He was pulled after 5 innings and we gave the high leverage one run innings to Slama and Mahay and lost the game. Now with our added depth, Crain and Rauch could have pitched those innings.

The innings in that game were important 1 run innings and should go to the studs in the ’pen. Notice the next day we had two bullpen innings to pitch with a 5 run lead and those went to MattyG and Rauch. No more backwardsville.

5. I will restate again the main reason this trade was made. It was because of our old school manager who can see a tree but not the forest. He needs a CLOSER. Period. We couldn’t have traded for a guy like Downs because he’s not a Closer™.

Gardy needs a “closer” that he can put in the game for the 9th inning with a 1-3 run lead. He needs roles for all his guys in the bullpen so he can just cut-and-paste the guy into whatever the situation presents, or else he gets confused for all the thinking he should be doing. He’s been out of sorts this year beyond Matty 8th, Rauch 9th. Now he can go, 6th inning close game, Jesse Crain. 7th inning, close game, Rauch…etc.

it fights, but tolbert the true rubbish, is the son--japanese proverb
Chase Utley is a Nick Punto-type player, but with power--Bert Blyleven

by ajmargarine on Jul 30, 2010 12:20 PM EDT reply actions  

well...

he’s the one managing the team. If he tells the Front Office that he wants a closer that he can feel comfortable to put in high leverage situations than aren’t they obliged to get him one?

If this is who they thought was best suited for that situation than did they really overpay?

Lost in all of this is that the Twins finally did something that everyone has been asking them to do, they took a risk and traded away some of their future for a player they think will help them now. This doesn’t happen all that often.

by tc_brent on Jul 30, 2010 12:36 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

My house could have gone for a lot more too

But the market just wasn’t willing to pay what I thought it was worth, so I had to settle for a lower price.

The beard abides.

by Jason Kubel's Beard on Jul 30, 2010 1:05 PM EDT reply actions   1 recs

not so much

if you didn’t need to sell your house this year.

My life's goal: to force fischean itno using her moderator powers

by montanatwinsfan on Jul 30, 2010 2:19 PM EDT up reply actions  

but if you needed that extra cash this year

and i dont mean the money to pay CAPS, but him to get us into the worldseries

by twinscrazy_german on Jul 30, 2010 2:28 PM EDT up reply actions  

Lots of people liked the design of his house, but it was still under construction.

Instead, he traded the house for a high-price condo.

Souhan in Chinese! : "一會兒,德爾蒙楊想與他無關的隊友。不想讓他們打他。難道不希望他們偷了他的頭盔。不希望他們成為他的Facebook的朋友。"

by what_would_gil_thorp_do on Jul 30, 2010 11:00 PM EDT up reply actions  

Something needed to happen to help the team now.

Something happened.

Let's Go Twins!
Minnesota Wild Off-season: In Fletch We Trust.

by redheadzeb on Jul 30, 2010 1:10 PM EDT reply actions  

The day that . . .

John Bonnes, Seth Stohs, Aaron Gleeman, Chris Mottram, Parker Hageman, Josh Johnson, Patrick Reuesse, etc. are made GM of the Twins is the day I stick a fork in each eye.

Of course if I am named GM, you all can stick forks in your eyes. I would understand.

by That'sWhatSheSaid on Jul 30, 2010 1:13 PM EDT reply actions  

I have an idea

lets trade Aaron Hicks for Livan Hernandez! It is essentially the same trade as Ramos for Capps!

"Don't take life for granted, because tomorrow isn't promised to any of us." - Kirby Puckett

by BCTwins on Jul 30, 2010 1:46 PM EDT reply actions  

Come on, you're better than that

"You're thinking too much. Just have fun." -- Bennie "The Jet" Rodriguez in Sandlot

by cmathewson on Jul 30, 2010 1:51 PM EDT up reply actions  

Trading from a position of strength

for a position of “need”. Livan is having a career year this year, just like Capps. Both were gawd-awful last year. Two of our top 5 prospects to Washington. I see no reason why we should not do this!

"Don't take life for granted, because tomorrow isn't promised to any of us." - Kirby Puckett

by BCTwins on Jul 30, 2010 1:52 PM EDT up reply actions  

OK, I'll play
  1. Hicks is a much better prospect than Ramos. Hicks is a B and Ramos is a C+ according to Sickels.
  2. Hernandez is not better than any of the Twins five starters. Capps is better than all but one of the Twins relievers.

"You're thinking too much. Just have fun." -- Bennie "The Jet" Rodriguez in Sandlot

by cmathewson on Jul 30, 2010 2:20 PM EDT up reply actions  

I'll play too

Hicks is 20yo in A ball and is blocked from the bigleagues right now despite his talent and readiness by who? …

My life's goal: to force fischean itno using her moderator powers

by montanatwinsfan on Jul 30, 2010 2:42 PM EDT up reply actions  

Right

Hicks is the next Torii Hunter. No disrespect to Span or Revere, but we don’t have a Torii Hunter. The closest would be Joe Benson, who projects more as a right fielder. Angel Morales is the next closest, and he also projects as a corner outfielder.

"You're thinking too much. Just have fun." -- Bennie "The Jet" Rodriguez in Sandlot

by cmathewson on Jul 30, 2010 3:40 PM EDT up reply actions  

My amateur scouting report on Hicks

Plus speed, bad jumps reading the ball off the bat. Plus arm, throw doesn’t always go to the base. Plus base runner, stole 3rd with ease but there were lots of SB that night. Decent pitch recognition, powerful swing. Best instincts are baserunning.

The tools were all evident. He needs lots of work to turn the tools into skills.

by DJL44 on Jul 30, 2010 11:01 PM EDT up reply actions  

That's about right

He won’t be here until 2014. There’s plenty of time to let him fill out and mature. But he reminds me of a switch hitting Hunter with more speed.

"You're thinking too much. Just have fun." -- Bennie "The Jet" Rodriguez in Sandlot

by cmathewson on Jul 30, 2010 11:57 PM EDT up reply actions  

Nobody else really stood out

Matt Tone got the win but has a hard time throwing strikes, no problems throwing hard. Lots of bases stolen on Josmil Pinto but he can handle a bat. McCallum is scrappy but you can’t spell that without crappy – I’m not sure what MLB skills he possesses.

by DJL44 on Jul 31, 2010 8:21 AM EDT up reply actions  

As someone from the "we could have gotten more" crowd, I say this:

Obviously, more doesn’t have to be Lee/Haren/Oswalt. The Twins tried, that didn’t work. I, personally, get that. I’m disappointed it didn’t help get us Lee or Haren, but I get it. I’m not sure about the other “we could have gotten more” crowd. I’m merely speakin for myself.

Is there no #2/#3 pitchers available at all? No one that is worse than Liriano, but better than Pavano? That would have been more to me and would fill a bigger need. I would have been good with that.

If those types of pitchers weren’t available then do nothing. Would some people have been mad at nothing? Yes, definitely. I would not be one of those people. If it is Capps or nothing, I would have said nothing, especially when the price is Ramos.

I feel like this was rushed. A move to make a move. Does it help the bullpen? Yes, I think so…Ramos-worthy help though? Put our BP over the top for the rest of the season? I don’t feel either of those questions lead me to a “yes” answer.

It feels like Ramos was treated like he needed to be traded now or never, like we only had him for this year and that’s it. Would Ramos’ stock have dropped so much that he would have been worth less than this in the offseason or later? I know it’s a possibility, but was it a huge possibility? I don’t feel like it was a huge possibility. If he had a season ending injury or career ending, yes, but otherwise I think his stock still should have been up.

We likely do need relievers next year too, so in a way he helps with that, though he will be expensive. I also think we still need a SP next year and that, to me, is more important. Using Ramos to get a good/great pitcher who would be here at least 1.5 years. We might even need two pitchers next year, if Pavano goes.

Like I said, I feel like he could have been had for more, if not now, then in the offseason. I was completely fine with holding on to him even until the start of next year or a little later.

Baseball reminds us of all that once was good, and that could be again.-Terence Mann/James Earl Jones in FoD

by Twins33 on Jul 30, 2010 2:03 PM EDT reply actions   1 recs

Boy, I really hope that Capps pitches horribly

so that all of you naysayers can feel good about yourselves. Is this an end of the world trade? Who cares? We needed a left-handed reliever and didn’t three back-up catchers. If Ramos didn’t go now he wouldn’t have gone this year and then everyone would be bitching that we didn’t make a move. Everything will be just fine. Morneau, Hudson, (Punto… maybe) off the DL will help and Duensing has been good so far. We’re JUST FINE.

by GopherPride on Jul 30, 2010 2:13 PM EDT reply actions  

but what hand does he use when he 'reads' Playboy?

My life's goal: to force fischean itno using her moderator powers

by montanatwinsfan on Jul 30, 2010 2:45 PM EDT up reply actions  

+50

Any reference to Princess Bride gets a rec… ;-)

Run baby run!

by darren004 on Jul 30, 2010 3:36 PM EDT up reply actions  

awesome

Souhan in Chinese! : "一會兒,德爾蒙楊想與他無關的隊友。不想讓他們打他。難道不希望他們偷了他的頭盔。不希望他們成為他的Facebook的朋友。"

by what_would_gil_thorp_do on Jul 30, 2010 11:04 PM EDT up reply actions  

Trade

It would have been stupid to Bill Smith to trade anyone other than Ramos. All the other prospects potentially have a future in the organization and Ramos had none. Couple that with the fact that he has had injuries and struggled mightily at AAA this year means that his value was low. They needed to strengthen the bullpen and they did so in a good way while paying the price with a 100% expendable asset. I find it nice to see them make this kind of move normally they hold on to prospects so incredibly tight I certainly don’t want even 2% of a Kenny Williams type mentality but I like them actually pulling the trigger on a prospect for major league help deal.

by holymackerel on Jul 30, 2010 3:56 PM EDT reply actions  

Realist

Not that I am satisfied with the trade. But Capps is an improvement. Most Twins fans are vastly overestimated the value of Ramos.

Even if he becomes a productive hitting Catcher.

by Joshua P on Jul 30, 2010 5:49 PM EDT reply actions   1 recs

Over estimating Ramos' value

This line I’m seeing repeated isn’t defensible. It’s based on a small sample size for a young 22 year old in his first year at AAA. A couple OK months at AAA doesn’t mean he’s not the prospect everyone always pegged him as.

Maroon and Gold Headquarters: The Daily Gopher

by PJS on Jul 30, 2010 6:00 PM EDT reply actions  

Reality

I’m basing his value on what he actually could get in the market.

Lee = no
Oswalt = [probably] no
Whatever is greater than Capps = no
Capps = yes

Ergo, that is his value. I may be a little naive, and that may be a bit simplistic, but I’ll give the front office enough credit they shopped Ramos enough to know this is what they could get. The other thing they have to be extremely careful of is not basing a move on what MAY happen in the future.

Would I have loved to see Wilson worth more? You bet I would, but the market says he wasn’t.

Let’s face it, Twins (Minnesota) fans are never happy, no matter what happens. Maybe those are the expectations we need to manage? Just sayin’

Let's Go Twins!
Minnesota Wild Off-season: In Fletch We Trust.

by redheadzeb on Jul 30, 2010 6:46 PM EDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

TT is an SB Nation blog of, by and for the fans. We strive to be the best Minnesota Twins blog by providing quality content and analysis, as well as daily news and notes on the team. We hope you'll make Twinkie Town your home for all things Twins!

Twinkie Town On Twitter


Editor-In-Chief

Twinkietown_small Jesse

Senior Writer

Small Bobomojo

Hrbek_small Jon Marthaler

The_jet_small cmathewson

Gladdentwins_small Adam Peterson

Hosken_powell_autograph_small RandBall's Stu

Twins_woo_small Steve Adams

W00t__2__small brandonwarne52

Special Contributor

Small roger13

Untitled_small Trevour

Chairmanmauer_small fischean