August Transaction Primer: How Waiver Season Works
This was our August Transaction Primer from last year. It bears repeating on a yearly basis. Hopefully this clears up some of the questions you have, and we'll write up a new one come next year.
Impress your friends with your knowledge of waiver wire trades, including the ins and outs of who gets priority, who gets put on waivers and how complicated it all really is!
If an organization wants to make a trade after the July 31 deadline they still can, it just becomes more complicated. It's harder to trade with one specific team, there's more risk involved and it's a lot more tactical as teams have the opportunity to potentially interfere with rival clubs.
It all starts by a team (we'll say the Twins) placing a player on waivers. In many cases a club will put players on waivers simply to judge interest, and will pull him back if he's claimed. But we'll deal with that in a moment.
Think of waivers as a list of every team in baseball. Once you make a player available to that list, teams have 47 business hours in which to place a claim on said player. From here there are three options.
No teams place a claim on the player: In this scenario a player has "passed through waivers", and the Twins would be free to trade the player with any team in baseball they choose...provided the player is traded for either A) 40-man roster players who have also cleared waivers, or B) non 40-man roster players.
One team places a claim on the player: The Twins would have 48.5 hours to work out a trade with the claiming club, or allow the claiming club to pay $20,000 and assume the player's contract.
Multiple teams place a claim: Teams with the worst records have priority, subject to teams being in the same league. In the Twins case, for example, say the Orioles, Rays, Astros and Braves all placed a waiver claim on the player. The Orioles would be awarded a claim over the Rays, the Rays would still have priority over the Astros, and the Astros over the Braves. Again, the two teams have 48.5 hours to work out a trade, or the claiming club would have to pay the $20,000 transaction fee and assume the player's contract.
There are three main reasons a player will be placed on waivers:
- To judge interest.
- To trade the player.
- To dump salary.
There are two main reasons a team will make a claim on a player:
- The team actually has interest in acquiring the player.
- The team is trying to block a competitor from being awarded the claim, in which case the claiming team usually believes the player will be pulled off waivers. But this is also how teams get stuck paying salaries they did not actually want to take on, if the original club is looking to dump salary. Even if a deal can't be worked out, the original team can essentially stick the claiming team with the tab.
Finally, waiver requests can be revoked. The main three reasons for revoking a player are:
- The original club was gauging interest in the player and had no interest in trading him, as mentioned earlier.
- The original club does not want to send the player to the team awarded the waiver claim.
- The original club and the claiming club cannot work out a trade.
Once a player has been pulled back, he can be placed on waivers again but this time they are irrevocable.
So, to summarize:
- Nearly all players are put on waivers in August.
- Not all players on waivers are placed there with the intention of being moved.
- Teams with worse records have priority over teams with better records, American League teams have priority over American League players and National League teams have priority over National League players.
- Teams will often make a claim on a player to block a rival club from being awarded the claim, but this is dangerous because the claiming team could just get stuck with a player they didn't want...and his salary. It's the reason Manny Ramirez cleared waivers a few years ago: nobody wanted to get stuck with his contract.
- If a player clears waivers they may be traded to any team, for a player who has also cleared waivers or for non 40-man roster players.
- If a player is claimed he can only be dealt to the team awarded the claim.
- A player can be pulled off waivers once, but if put on a second time the waivers are irrevocable.
I hope that makes at least a little bit of sense and clears up any basic questions you have. Enjoy the rest of your Monday.
31 comments
|
8 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I'll admit to not fully understanding this process before reading your post
Now I get it. Well-written and rec’d.
by MarshalltheIrish on Aug 1, 2010 8:11 PM EDT reply actions
So if I understand this right, we may have a hard time getting a starting pitcher worth our while. As long as Detroit doesn’t fall too far and remains in contention, I would assume they would be in the market for a SP. Having said this, any SP we would have interest in, Detroit would too and thus lay a claim to a guy we want, and with them having a worse record, they would have priority. Is that an accurate assumption?
unless Boston
is planning on sending Jon Lester or Clay Bucholz through waivers, I don’t think there are any other pitchers out there that are worth the Twins while to try and pick up. Waivers can be a risky business so we are not going to see Seattle attempting to trade Felix Hernandez through waivers.
"Don't take life for granted, because tomorrow isn't promised to any of us." - Kirby Puckett
"Nearly all players are put on waivers in August. "
Does “nearly” include Bucholz and Lester? How close to 100% is nearly?
by z-squad on Aug 2, 2010 9:24 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions
Is the waiver wire for public viewing or is there a special teletype machine in the FO?
by z-squad on Aug 2, 2010 9:32 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions
is there a special teletype machine in the FO?
I was curious about this myself last year so I pestered a club official about the nuts-and-bolts of the waiver claim process. According to an email reply I recieved from Dave St Peter, teams have an email/portal system on their computers which is monitored/operated by the MLB home office. Once a team decides to place a player on waivers, all teams are then notified via email and through the portal system. So there really is no “slipping” someone past waivers. If another team is interested in one of the players that happens to appear in the system, that team makes a written claim through the portal linked up with MLB’s home office.
by TwinsFanc1981 on Aug 2, 2010 4:10 PM EDT up reply actions
That's really interesting.
I’d wondered myself how public it was, within the baseball world, as to who claimed whom and when other teams would know. It’s interesting that it’s so transparent.
It's all based on record
Teams with the worst records get to make claims or pass. Only after a lot of teams pass on players do the better teams have a chance to make a claim.
Last year, the Twins went into a slide in July and, for a time, were in third place in the division. This enabled them to put in claims on guys like Pavano and Rauch when guys like that were often claimed in previous years.
I don’t expect them to get as many chances this year with their record. But as long as they are behind the White Sox, they have a better chance to bolster their line-up before they set playoff rosters on August 30.
"You're thinking too much. Just have fun." -- Bennie "The Jet" Rodriguez in Sandlot
Oh, I just realized that these comments are all a year old
I was really confused about why people thought the Tigers would have first claim over the Twins.
by ColossusOfRhode on Aug 1, 2011 1:14 PM EDT up reply actions
We both get a Facepalm
Seriously, Jesse is busy with whatever he is doing in Jolly olde England and didn’t have time to write up a new article.
I'm a proud fan of the Minnesota Twins and Dallas Cowboys!
"Life is precious and time is a key element. Let’s make every moment count and help those who have a greater need than our own." – Harmon Killebrew
Detroit
The Tigers are .500 right now, seven back of the WSox. They play a four-gamer at Comerica and if the Tigers don’t at least split, I think it is season over. They would have to gain more than seven games over two teams, a real hurdle. With that said, I don’t think the Tigers would then claim anyone.
by Alexi Casilla All-Star on Aug 2, 2010 5:54 AM EDT up reply actions
It's the right assumption.
But also, Carl Pavano fell to the Twins last season. Granted, he was a special case because of his injury history and not being a necessarily front-of-the-line guy, but it’s the type of player the Twins were able to pick up. There should be pitchers that either fall to the Twins or clear waivers, it’s just hard to determine who.
Kevin Millwood for one
There are others, Ben Sheets. I don’t see a move happening unless there is an injury.
Millwood yes, Guthrie is another one I thought of.
Those are best-case scenario guys. The only way a premium player slips through is if he has a mega contract.
The Twins put Joe Mauer on waivers!!1!
panic panic panic!
it fights, but tolbert the true rubbish, is the son--japanese proverb
Chase Utley is a Nick Punto-type player, but with power--Bert Blyleven
Say team A puts a player on waivers, and teams B, C, and D all claim him. If a deal can’t be worked out between A and B, can A then negotiate with C and then D?
MLB Trade Rumors - Waiver Trade Candidates:
Twins closer Joe Nathan could clear waivers, since he’s recovering from Tommy John surgery and set to earn $11.25MM in 2011. Nick Punto, Nick Blackburn, and Brendan Harris should also make their way through.
Great
Just what we need. Another forum for people to post long rants about how terrible the Twins ARE because they ARE going to trade Kevin Slowey for a bucket of balls, or they AREN’T going to Trade Nick Blackburn for a giant rainbow lollipop.
I don't know, but I've been told it's hard to run with the weight of gold,
'the other hand, I've heard it said, it's just as hard with the weight of lead.
by montanatwinsfan on Aug 1, 2011 10:39 AM EDT reply actions
Continuity Error
“In the Twins case, for example, say the Orioles, Rays, Astros and Braves all placed a waiver claim on the player. The Orioles would be awarded a claim over the Rays, the Rays would still have priority over the Pirates, and the Pirates over the Braves.”
You say Astros first and then replace it with Pirates.
I wrote this last year
and made updates today to have it make a little more sense. Forgot to change the second “Pirates”.
Thanks though.
I've got to think we're positioned pretty well to make August moves this year.
Am I wrong? With our current 4th place standing, we should still be able to trade for a decent relief arm and/or infielders off of waivers with less chances of getting blocked, and some of the guys we can be unloading aren’t terribly likely to be picked up or blocked on waivers either if we happen to be dealing with a current or future contender.
I guess I’m just not buying the idea that the FO’s non-move at yesterday’s non-waiver deadline is such a sign of incompetence that seems to be floating around. It just shows that when everyone else is thinking “blockbuster,” we’re well positioned to make some low-profile, yet effective, moves later on.
"...and we'll see ya tomorrow night!" - Jack Buck, Game 6, 1991 World Series
by WindyCityTwinsFan on Aug 1, 2011 5:04 PM EDT reply actions
A time capsule from 2010!
Back in those days an iPhone4G was some new fangled device that just came out. Can you imagine?
"Don't take life for granted, because tomorrow isn't promised to any one of us." -Kirby Puckett
"God grab your neck but never choke" -Ozzie Guillen
by less cowbell, more 'neau on Aug 1, 2011 7:25 PM EDT reply actions
Great article!
Thank you for your explanation of a very complicated issue.

by 
























