Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Dallas Cowboys Projects: Andre Holmes

Which team has the more difficult road to the playoffs?

In two months, the Twins regular season will be over.  Between now and then, the team will play 55 games, needing to overcome a 1.5 game deficit to the White Sox in order to win the AL Central.

Given the fact we just hit the two month countdown, I thought it might be useful to do a stretch-run schedule comparison, to see if either team has a significantly easier path to the postseason.

To start, let's look at some basic facts about the two teams' remaining schedule:

  • The Twins have 28 home games remaining and 27 games on the road. The White Sox have 28 left at home and 28 away.
  • The teams face each other 9 more times. Three of the games are at Target Field, six are in Chicago.
  • The four toughest opponents on either team's schedule (not counting the games left against each other) are Tampa Bay, New York, Boston, and Texas. The Twins have 9 games left against those teams - 2 more in Tampa, 4 in Texas, and 3 more against Texas at Target Field. The White Sox have 10 games left against this group - they play the Yankees 3 more times at home, and have 7 games left against the Red Sox (4 at home, 3 away).
  • Both teams play 37 more games against teams with .500 or better records.

Next, I looked at two stats to compare the two teams remaining schedules: the winning percentage of each team's upcoming opponents, as well as their opponent's "second-order", adjusted winning percentage (via Baseball Prospectus, full explanation here)

Star-divide

Opponents' Winning Percentage

All Remaining Games

Winning %

Adj. Winning %

Twins

0.501

0.499

White Sox

0.484

0.495

Next, I did the same analysis, but subtracted the games the teams play against each other.

Opponents' Winning Percentage

Not including Twins/White Sox

Winning %

Adj. Winning %

Twins

0.488

0.488

White Sox

0.471

0.479

 

By these measures the Twins face a slightly more difficult schedule from here on out.  While we don't have to face either the Yankees or Red Sox, we do have two series left against Texas.  More importantly, the White Sox have seven games remaining against Baltimore, who currently sport the worst winning percentage in baseball.

I also tried grouping each team's remaining games in three categories: games against teams with sub-.450 adjusted winning percentages, games against teams with adjusted winning percentages between .450 and .550, and games against teams with adjusted winning percentages above .550.

Opponents' Adj. Winning Percentage

# of games

<.450

.450-.550

>.550

Twins

21

12

22

White Sox

22

15

19

Now, we'll break down the data by month, looking solely at adjusted winning percentage:

Opponents' Adj. Winning Percentage

By Month

August

Sept./Oct.

Twins

0.507

0.492

White Sox

0.478

0.510

This is a little bit more interesting.  The White Sox have an extremely soft schedule in August (their August opponents' actual cumulative winning percentage is .461), but they potentially face a tough road in the last month of the season, including a 16-game stretch against teams currently sporting winning records.  The Twins schedule works just the opposite: August features games against Tampa Bay, Chicago, Texas, and Los Angeles, while September presents home and away series with both Kansas City and Cleveland. 

Of course, the wild card in all this is waiting to see which teams will still be competitive in September.  Right now, the Tigers sport a .500 winning percentage and an adjusted winning percentage that's even higher.  Considering their injuries and decline in the standings, it wouldn't be surprising to see them use September as an opportunity to spread around playing time and protect key starters.  However, if they are able to piece together a strong August, they could remain a formidable opponent in the season's final weeks.

For sake of argument, let's assume both the Tigers and A's fall out of the playoff hunt by September (which seems a reasonable possibility, although far from guaranteed).  If that were true, the Twins would not play a competitive team after September 16 and would only play a total of six games against playoff-caliber teams after September 1. 

It's a little harder to present a similar analysis for Chicago.  Their September schedule is filled with teams that may or may not be competitive, including Boston, Los Angeles, Oakland, and Detroit.  If at least two of those teams are still fighting for a playoff berth in September, Chicago could have a very difficult month.  This will all play out between September 17th and 30th, when Chicago plays three at home against Detroit, three in Oakland, three in Los Angeles, and four at home against Boston.  That could be a season-changing stretch of games for the White Sox, the difficulty of which will be determined by where those four teams are in the standings.

At the end of the day, it's hard to say that either Minnesota or the White Sox have a significant advantage in their remaining schedule.  The White Sox seem to have a slightly easier road, especially given the fact they host 6 of the 9 remaining games between the two teams.  However, if the race remains neck-and-neck through August, it is possible the differences in the two teams' September schedules could play a role in which team is crowned division champions.

Comment 23 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

163 x 3

This will come down to the final week, again. Possibly a 1 game playoff, again.

by DJL44 on Aug 4, 2010 9:07 AM EDT reply actions  

Agree

Totally coming down to the final 2 weeks. I’m hoping we can wrap it up before October 2nd, because I have to go out of town for a wedding and will be caught up in festivities and will probably miss the last two regular season games!!

The beard abides.

by Jason Kubel's Beard on Aug 4, 2010 10:26 AM EDT up reply actions  

I'd tell your friends or family to get their priorities straight.

There are only three or four critical baseball weeks every year. Nobody should get married around this time.

Yes, Dad, if you’re reading this, I’m talking about you too.

by Jesse on Aug 4, 2010 10:41 AM EDT up reply actions  

Playoff

Wow… wouldn’t that be an amazing story if the twins ended up in a 1 game playoff AGAIN.

------------------------------------
Read my
Minnesota Vikings Blog (The Viking Ship)
... or my
Minnesota Twins Blog (Twins Dugout)

by TheJazzyOne on Aug 4, 2010 11:22 AM EDT up reply actions  

Please no

Every time we go through that, I lose an extra year of life.

"You're thinking too much. Just have fun." -- Bennie "The Jet" Rodriguez in Sandlot

by cmathewson on Aug 4, 2010 12:03 PM EDT up reply actions  

Game 163!!!

Since we’re leading the series with the WSux so far it will be at the Dome Target Field, and this time we have Thome. It would be sweet if he got the walk off HR for us!

Also, who’s been calling Game 163 since this spring? Yeah, that’s right, me! I was! Deal with it!

"Don't take life for granted, because tomorrow isn't promised to any one of us." -Kirby Puckett
Minnesota Twins 2010: GAME 163 OR BUST!!!

by less cowbell, more 'neau on Aug 4, 2010 10:45 AM EDT reply actions  

Game 163

@ TF with Blackburn as the starting pitcher and Thome with the game winning HR, this time against Chicago…

That would be funny and kind of freaky

by caluofmn on Aug 4, 2010 11:10 AM EDT up reply actions  

Digging too deep

I appreciate your analysis of the schedules and all, but it really doesn’t make a difference. Who cares if the Twins play the Rays while the White Sox play the Yankees? Remaining opponents only really come into play in the last week or 2 of the season. Trying to draw conclusions from them before mid-September is futile. There are too many other factors that weigh more heavily on the race at this point (injuries, slumps, call-ups, etc.).

Regardless of how you look at it, the division race is likely going to come down to the remaining 9 games played between the Twins and White Sox. If one team wins even 6 of those games, it becomes very difficult for the other team to overcome it.

-Flip

by Flip27 on Aug 4, 2010 11:38 AM EDT reply actions  

Fair Points

All fair points, Flip, but I do disagree that the schedule “doesn’t make a difference.” The White Sox getting 7 games against Baltimore this month really does matter, especially while the Twins face a significantly more difficult schedule. Even if both teams play equally well, we could drop a couple more games behind the White Sox this month just based on the competition we’re facing. If that does happen, it will be good for us to remember that the two teams were facing different levels of competition, and that Chicago’s schedule looks much tougher over the final few weeks. Remember the media freak out when we fell behind Chicago at the break, after they just went through one of the softest stretches on their entire schedule? Things looked a lot different when we faced some weak teams coming out of the break, didn’t it?

Now, just so we know we probably 95% agree, none of this is more important than how each team plays the rest of the season. And, yes, the most important games on the schedule are the 9 we play against each other, six of which will be in Chicago.

by Bobomojo on Aug 4, 2010 12:00 PM EDT up reply actions  

I'm not saying it doesn't make ANY difference...

…it just doesn’t make a significant difference. You never know if teams are going to be playing well. You don’t know who will be hurt. It’s just as likely that the Rangers could go into a slump by the time that the Twins get to Texas as it is for Baltimore to catch fire in time to play Chicago. It’s not necessarily who you play, but when you play them.

Things do, for the most part, even out over a season depending on the talent level and management compotency of a ballclub. Part of your analysis here is dependant on the winning percentages of teams so far this season. I believe those statistics are not very reliable for predicting the future performance of any particular team. There are too many factors that are not considered when just looking at wins and losses. For example, run differential is a much, better indicator of the quality of a team than the win-loss record. -The Twins are +89 where the White Sox are +57. Why then are the White Sox in first place?

Luck plays a much, much bigger role here than the remaining schedule. So much so, that it makes the schedule pretty irrelevant. When you get down to the last few weeks of a season, then you can start to make some assumptions based on who is healthy, who is getting September playing time, what the pitching match-ups are, etc. -But with 2 months left on the schedule, I don’t see how you can hope to draw any reliable conclusions here.

-Flip

by Flip27 on Aug 4, 2010 2:15 PM EDT up reply actions  

Again, all fair points

Just wanted to point out a couple things:

1. For most of the comparisons, I was using Baseball Prospectus’ second-order winning percentage, rather than the teams’ actual win-loss record. The adjusted version just looks at the quality of the teams offense and defense, with some adjustments, and projects what their win-loss record “should” be based on those factors. It has nothing to do with how many games the team has actually won or lost.

2. Re: Luck. Yes, “luck” or “randomness” or whatever someone chooses to call it will probably determine who wins this division. Two closely matched teams, with similar records, play a fairly similar schedule – sounds like it’s about a coin flip from here on out. But, since it’s impossible for us to analysis how “luck” will impact the next two months, why not look at some of the tangible, measurable things that could impact this race?

I promise I’m not trying to be defensive, and I do appreciate the reaction. When I started writing the article, I had no idea what I’d find. I did some research and presented the results, and tried to analysis what the most likely impact of the schedule would be (Overall, things look a little easier for the sox, but if the race is tight come September, the odds could swing our way). Nothing more, nothing less.

by Bobomojo on Aug 4, 2010 3:17 PM EDT up reply actions  

The White Sox have the more difficult road

because the Twins are the better team. The best pitcher (Liriano) plays for the Twins as do the best position players (Mauer, Morneau). The Sox have had a few guys get hot, but the Twins are the more talented team.

by Stefa on Aug 4, 2010 11:43 AM EDT reply actions  

well Mauer at least

it isn’t a sure bet that Morneau comes back… but I really hope he does… and soon

by caluofmn on Aug 4, 2010 11:46 AM EDT up reply actions  

Well, then...

Do the White Sox have a better position player than Delmon?

"There are only two things that are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former." - Albert Einstein

by BeefMaster on Aug 4, 2010 11:55 AM EDT up reply actions  

A team like Cleveland can really make

a difference. They beat Detroit 4 straight after the All-Star Break and took 2 out of 3 from the Twins at Target Field. If Chicago is done with a team like that early, it can really help. That said, Hafner and Santana just went on the DL. And, if Boston has no chance at the end of the season, you can sure bet they will not be trotting out their big horses. Meanwhile the Jays will all want to go out in style, leading the league in homers and the rest.

Lots of factors at play, but I don’t see a clear advantage. The main thing is to play well, avoid injuries and peak at the right time. The Twins have had a mixed record in that regard.

by Old Twins Cap on Aug 4, 2010 11:53 AM EDT reply actions  

I'm more worried about avoiding injuries than peaking

Man, it would be great to get Morneau/Punto/Hudson back and healthy soon. Not to mention Neshek, Baker and Mauer (and Matty G?) getting back to top form. Also heard the announcers say last night that B-Dunce might be experiencing some dead arm.

by dctwin on Aug 4, 2010 11:57 AM EDT up reply actions  

Well done

"it’s over, tdogg.

no. it’s not unlike me. when i make an unqualified statement, it means i’m sure i’m right" Larry

by Tdogg on Aug 4, 2010 12:54 PM EDT reply actions  

Injuries / Trades

The other interesting aspect of how the schedule is panning out, and this is just how things play out throughout the course of a season, but Chicago finished all of their games against Texas before they acquired Cliff Lee. There’s a good chance we could see Lee twice. On the flip side we only had to play Boston 4 times all season, Chicago has to play them 7 more times and they’re just starting to get healthy. Chicago also has 11 games remaining against Detroit who has been decimated by injuries, we only have 6. I’m not saying it comes down to luck, but I’m just trying to acknowledge how some of these nuances play out over the course of the season. The last week was encouraging for the Twins as we took care of the teams we had to beat, now if we can get healthy and play with playoff bound teams like the Rays and Rangers, it’ll be an exciting final 2 months :)

by PRegiment on Aug 4, 2010 3:08 PM EDT reply actions  

I think you are giving the Tigers too much credit.

Their offense is essentially a AAA club featuring Carbrera and old man Damon right now and the Sox have a ton of games left vs them.

I dont expect them to stay at .500 even past today. Never mind their adj. win % that is based on Maggs and company in the line up.

Anyway, good article. I’d give the Sox a slight advantage schedule wise, but one that can easily be overcome in the head to head games remaining.

Go Sox.

its time for the come to Jesus moment and admit Kotsay's time has long passed. -tdogg

by e-gus on Aug 4, 2010 4:00 PM EDT reply actions  

Just take care of business

Go 30-25 down th stretch, finish with 89 wins, and I think we get in. Just win games, baby.

by AM. on Aug 4, 2010 5:47 PM EDT via mobile reply actions  

KEY: may be...

Det vs. ChiSox…starting tonight they still play each other 12 times. ChiSox should win a good percentage of those games, YET these are Division Games.

Also, while Sox have 7 games with Balt. Det have 6. Might not be quite as easy as 10 days ago. I live down the road from Baltimore, and with Showalter in the house, the O’s are already showing some spine…time will tell.

IMHO, should the Chi/Det remaining games fall 7-5/6-6, the schedule is 3/4 games in favor of Twins. Of Course the games do have to be played.

Regards,

I don't suffer from insanity...I relish every moment of it!

by the Dragon on Aug 4, 2010 8:06 PM EDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

TT is an SB Nation blog of, by and for the fans. We strive to be the best Minnesota Twins blog by providing quality content and analysis, as well as daily news and notes on the team. We hope you'll make Twinkie Town your home for all things Twins!

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Tc_at_tf_small
Hope in Beloit?
Jedi2_small
The Billy Beane Memorial Pick 6 Challenge™

Recent FanPosts

2011-06-18_22
Rochester Celebrates 10 years of affiliation by immortalizing Dustin Martin on a Magnet
Small
I get tired of trade or acquisition discussions. . .
Snickers_small
The Next Move
Small
(Cross-post from my blog) Twins. Red Wings. It's a revolving door.
Waterpolo1956_small
Free Anthony Slama!
Snickers_small
"We Gotta Start Trading 'Em...All Of 'Em!"
Small
AAA players who could help the Twins
Justin_morneau-143_small
Fixing the Twins Pitching
The_jet_small
Poll: How long 'till a Trevor Plouffe DFA?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Twinkie Town On Twitter

Yahoo_full_count

Editor-In-Chief

Twinkietown_small Jesse

Senior Writer

Small Bobomojo

Hrbek_small Jon Marthaler

The_jet_small cmathewson

Gladdentwins_small Adam Peterson

Hosken_powell_autograph_small RandBall's Stu

Mustache_small Andrew Bryz-Gornia

Twins_woo_small Steve Adams

W00t__2__small brandonwarne52

Special Contributor

Small roger13

Untitled_small Trevour

Chairmanmauer_small fischean

Metargetfieldjose_small myjah

Small Brady Eyestone