Everything* you need to know about Frankie’s no-hitter
Well, we've seen prettier. We've seen more masterful. But for Twins fans recovering from the worst April in recent memory, it sure felt awfully sweet.
Francisco Liriano made history last night, pitching the season's first no-hitter, and the 264th in Major League history. To say the performance came as a shock would be a severe understatement: Twins fans have been digesting news that Liriano was a start or two away from losing his rotation spot for the past several days.
The fans at Twinkie Town, however, knew he had it in him. Jesse's headline yesterday read: The Hangover Ends Tonight.
There is a lot to talk about from this game, and we all deserve to take full opportunity of one of our few chances to celebrate so far this season. It's hard to believe that one dramatic game will turnaround our dismal season (this one didn't seem to work), and a six-walk, two-strikeout game does little to assuage the significant question marks surrounding our struggling ace. But at the very least, last night's game gives us the opportunity to say:
Later today, the Minnesota Twins will take on the last-place Chicago White Sox.
After the jump, I've compiled some interesting factoids about Liriano's unconventional no-hitter. Some of them I'm sure you've already seen, others I haven't seen presented yet. I, for one, am fascinated by this type of miscellanea - please add your own in the comments.
Liriano threw 123 pitches last night - 66 strikes and 57 balls.
His 123 pitches matches a career-high, set almost exactly a year ago (May 2, 2010). He hadn't thrown more than 97 pitches yet this year.
In 204 previous starts before last night, Liriano had never even pitched a complete game.
This was the first Twins no-hitter since Eric Milton in 1999. It was the first time the White Sox were no-hit since Bret Saberhagen shut them down in 1991.
This one I'm stealing from Elias: Liriano entered the game with a 9.13 ERA, the second-highest by a pitcher since earned runs became official in 1913. Bill Dietrich had a 10.13 ERA before throwing his no-hitter in 1937.
Liriano was just the thirteenth pitcher since 1919 to throw a no-hitter with two or fewer strikeouts. The last was Jerry Reuss of the Dodgers in 1980.
Throwing a no-hitter with 6 or more walks is not as rare as I would have guessed. Since 1919, 22 pitchers have accomplished that feat. Frankie's was the 7th since 1990.
Liriano earned a fairly pedestrian Game Score of 83 in pitching his no-hitter. Twelve pitchers have earned game scores higher than 83 already this season. Three others have matched it.
In fact, his Game Score of 83 ties the lowest mark of any no-hitter since 1919 (matching Lefty Chambers mark in 1951 - 8 walks, 4 strikeouts).
Frankie and Lefty share another chapter in history: they own the only two no-hitters since 1919 in which the pitcher walked four more batters than he struck out.
We know Franchise had some help from his fielders, but this one shocked me: this is the first time a pitcher's no-hitter was supported by 3 or more double plays. (Acknowledging we only have GIDP dating back to the early 50s).
This was just the seventh 1-0 no-hitter thrown since 1980. The last was tossed by Liriano's opponent last night: Edwin Jackson. That game featured a solo home run as well. The many similarities between those two games was covered extensively by Adam last night.
One last note: coming into the game, Frankie's xFIP stood at 5.25. His xFIP for the game? 5.97.
*Ok, not everything. I have a feeling we'll be talking about this game for years to come.
29 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Could you explain this a little more?
“Frankie’s xFIP stood at 5.25. His xFIP for the game? 5.97.”
So according to xFIP he really didn’t throw very well? Why? Because of the defense?
It's kind of self-explanatory, isn't it?
All the walks, all the balls in play, the numbers think he probably should have been hit a lot harder than he was in terms of runs.
But again, it’s just a fun number. These things are indicators of future performance when looking at the whole, but are kind of meaningless when looking at what’s already occurred. I think you can also say Liriano had luck on his side last night.
That is surprising
If you go solely by xFIP you would be MORE encouraged to dump him from the rotation after this outing.
xFIP is only a measure of Ks, BBs, and fly balls.
It’s entirely possible to give up 15 runs and have a great game xFIP and pitch a no-hitter and have a bad game xFIP.
Yes
This game is Exhibit A. Exhibit B is the game where he gave up forty seeing-eye singles – great for xFIP; not great actual results.
"There are only two things that are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former." - Albert Einstein
hmmm
I’m sure it is a good stat with a large sample size then, but does not tell us much about an individual start.
He was not really sharp last night, but kept the Whities off-balance and through some insanely good sliders and change-ups when he needed them.
And the White Sox all look a little like Butera right now.
He didn't throw well
He walked 6, and struck out 2. With all those walks, and all those balls in play, one would expect a very bad outcome.
Fun fact about Dietrich's no-hitter:
In his previous start, he went 3 1/3 innings, giving up 10 runs on 9 hits.
His no-hitter then came on 2 days rest.
I was at the game
It was cold, and the White Sox looked far worse than Liriano which resulted in a No Hitter via a couple good plays on defense. He did walk a lot of batters and it was one of those games where most people didn’t realize what was going on until the 9th inning.
Nice to see Liriano get the no hit game !
hey none of the walks got home ,so it’s all good some nice D as well !
by RED SOX are #1 in my heart on May 4, 2011 10:55 AM EDT reply actions
Ex-Twins Last Night
Fuentes and Rausch both blew games last night for their respective teams.
Plus ex-Twin Orlando Cabrera got the go-ahead hit for Cleveland.
Scott Erickson's Line from his No-Hitter in 1994
9 Innings pitched
No hits
No runs
No Earned runs
4 Walks
5 Strikeouts
No Home runs
5.28 ERA
31 Batters Faced
128 Pitches
and
71 for Strikes
Francisco Liriano’s No Hitter from last night:
9 Innings Pitched
No Runs
No Earned Runs
No Hits
6 Walks
2 Strikeouts
No Home Runs
6.61 ERA
30 Batters faced
121 Pitches
and
66 for Strikes
And lets keep in mind that Scott Erickson’s came in the climate controlled Metrodome while Liriano had to pitch in the cold.
I'm a proud fan of the worst team in the Majors!
Does anyone have a link to the Chicago commentary for the final out? I understand Hawk was not there (unfortunately or fortunately since I hate listening to him but might have enjoyed his misery) but it would still be interesting to hear it.
Records of teams after no hitter/perfect game
Doesn’t seem to affect much. This is 35 games after no hit / perfect for each
14-21 White Sox – Buehrle
17-18 Phillies – Haladay (not postseason)
12-23 D-Backs -Jackson
16-19 A’s. – Braden
22-13 Rays – Garza
18-17 Giants – Sanchez
Lets hope we are like the Rays!
"Brian Cardinal left Purdue being the only Boilermaker to receive both the "Mr. Hustle" Award and the "Courage" Award four years in a row"
Liriano also became the first pitcher to walk Juan Pierre three times in one game.
Not to mention the seventh pitcher to walk Juan Pierre three times in a season, and just the 29th pitcher to walk Juan Pierre three times.
No one has ever walked Pierre more than three times in a season, so we may be sweating a record here.
Liriano walked Pierre once last year.
So he also became the eleventh pitcher to walk Pierre four times. Only Carlos Zambrano (6) and Kerry Wood (5) have walked Pierre more than four times.
Not drinking the Kool Aid
Does this mean he will get shelled for 15 runs in 3 innings his next time out. Honestly guys I tried believing in what I like to call the Liriano Experiment, but it’s like a roller coaster ride, you never know what Liriano is going to show up. Until he gets that figured out and can be consistent then I see a proble child.
Congrats to him on his no no, however it only buys a person so much time if they can’t follow up with some quality starts.
quality starts?
Again, I’m not a great purveyor of statistics as I can’t even count to ten using both hands, but sometimes numbers can help us correct our biases when they just aren’t all that accurate. Please read this article posted here on twinkie town which describes just how inefficient Liriano ISN’T.
Then feel free to look at the numbers Liriano posted last season in the ‘quality start’ category, here.
Of all qualified starting pitchers liriano ranked number 32 in the percentage of starts he had which qualified as ‘quality starts’. Number 32 does not suggest that he is a quality start machine, but it certainly does suggest that this ongoing delusion that Liriano is inefficient and can’t get quality starts is not based in reality. Please note a couple of pitchers who had a slightly lower percentage of quality starts/start on that list; Cliff Lee and Zach Grienke.
How come you never see the headline "Psychic wins lottery"?
by montanatwinsfan on May 5, 2011 3:51 PM EDT up reply actions
Experiment?
That’s just clueless. But I can’t top what Montana said. So I’ll just stop at clueless.
"You're thinking too much. Just have fun." -- Bennie "The Jet" Rodriguez in Sandlot
Quality starts and cluelessness
I don’t base it on stats I base it on how many times the guy has gone out and gotten shelled then follows it up with a good perfromance, only to get shelled again in 5 days. What I want to see him do is become more consistent.
cmathewson, if you can’t do anything better than trying to insult people then please don’t bother opening your mouth. That is one of the most pathetic things I see on a blog, People like to smart off to other people knowing they are sitting behind the safety of a keyboard.

by 



























